From: Rohan McLure <rmclure@linux.ibm.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Rohan McLure <rmclure@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 03/20] powerpc/32: Remove powerpc select specialisation
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 12:05:31 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220824020548.62625-4-rmclure@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220824020548.62625-1-rmclure@linux.ibm.com>
Syscall #82 has been implemented for 32-bit platforms in a unique way on
powerpc systems. This hack will in effect guess whether the caller is
expecting new select semantics or old select semantics. It does so via a
guess, based off the first parameter. In new select, this parameter
represents the length of a user-memory array of file descriptors, and in
old select this is a pointer to an arguments structure.
The heuristic simply interprets sufficiently large values of its first
parameter as being a call to old select. The following is a discussion
on how this syscall should be handled.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/13737de5-0eb7-e881-9af0-163b0d29a1a0@csgroup.eu/
As discussed in this thread, the existence of such a hack suggests that for
whatever powerpc binaries may predate glibc, it is most likely that they
would have taken use of the old select semantics. x86 and arm64 both
implement this syscall with oldselect semantics.
Remove the powerpc implementation, and update syscall.tbl to refer to emit
a reference to sys_old_select for 32-bit binaries, in keeping with how
other architectures support syscall #82.
Signed-off-by: Rohan McLure <rmclure@linux.ibm.com>
---
V1 -> V2: Remove arch-specific select handler
V2 -> V3: Remove ppc_old_select prototype in <asm/syscalls.h>. Move to
earlier in patch series
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/syscalls.h | 2 --
arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls.c | 17 -----------------
arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 2 +-
.../arch/powerpc/entry/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 2 +-
4 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/syscalls.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/syscalls.h
index 675a8f5ec3ca..739498c358a1 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/syscalls.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/syscalls.h
@@ -18,8 +18,6 @@ long sys_mmap2(unsigned long addr, size_t len,
unsigned long fd, unsigned long pgoff);
long ppc64_personality(unsigned long personality);
long sys_rtas(struct rtas_args __user *uargs);
-int ppc_select(int n, fd_set __user *inp, fd_set __user *outp,
- fd_set __user *exp, struct __kernel_old_timeval __user *tvp);
long ppc_fadvise64_64(int fd, int advice, u32 offset_high, u32 offset_low,
u32 len_high, u32 len_low);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls.c
index fc999140bc27..ef5896bee818 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls.c
@@ -63,23 +63,6 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE6(mmap, unsigned long, addr, size_t, len,
return do_mmap2(addr, len, prot, flags, fd, offset, PAGE_SHIFT);
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_PPC32
-/*
- * Due to some executables calling the wrong select we sometimes
- * get wrong args. This determines how the args are being passed
- * (a single ptr to them all args passed) then calls
- * sys_select() with the appropriate args. -- Cort
- */
-int
-ppc_select(int n, fd_set __user *inp, fd_set __user *outp, fd_set __user *exp, struct __kernel_old_timeval __user *tvp)
-{
- if ((unsigned long)n >= 4096)
- return sys_old_select((void __user *)n);
-
- return sys_select(n, inp, outp, exp, tvp);
-}
-#endif
-
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
long ppc64_personality(unsigned long personality)
{
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl b/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
index 2600b4237292..4cbbb810ae10 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@
79 common settimeofday sys_settimeofday compat_sys_settimeofday
80 common getgroups sys_getgroups
81 common setgroups sys_setgroups
-82 32 select ppc_select sys_ni_syscall
+82 32 select sys_old_select sys_ni_syscall
82 64 select sys_ni_syscall
82 spu select sys_ni_syscall
83 common symlink sys_symlink
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/entry/syscalls/syscall.tbl b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/entry/syscalls/syscall.tbl
index 2600b4237292..4cbbb810ae10 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/entry/syscalls/syscall.tbl
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/entry/syscalls/syscall.tbl
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@
79 common settimeofday sys_settimeofday compat_sys_settimeofday
80 common getgroups sys_getgroups
81 common setgroups sys_setgroups
-82 32 select ppc_select sys_ni_syscall
+82 32 select sys_old_select sys_ni_syscall
82 64 select sys_ni_syscall
82 spu select sys_ni_syscall
83 common symlink sys_symlink
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-24 2:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-24 2:05 [PATCH v4 00/20] powerpc: Syscall wrapper and register clearing Rohan McLure
2022-08-24 2:05 ` [PATCH v4 01/20] powerpc: Remove asmlinkage from syscall handler definitions Rohan McLure
2022-08-25 7:04 ` Andrew Donnellan
2022-09-12 8:20 ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-08-24 2:05 ` [PATCH v4 02/20] powerpc: Use generic fallocate compatibility syscall Rohan McLure
2022-09-12 8:38 ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-09-12 9:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-09-12 11:00 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-09-12 11:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-08-24 2:05 ` Rohan McLure [this message]
2022-09-12 9:03 ` [PATCH v4 03/20] powerpc/32: Remove powerpc select specialisation Nicholas Piggin
2022-09-15 4:36 ` Rohan McLure
2022-08-24 2:05 ` [PATCH v4 04/20] powerpc: Provide do_ppc64_personality helper Rohan McLure
2022-09-12 9:26 ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-08-24 2:05 ` [PATCH v4 05/20] powerpc: Remove direct call to personality syscall handler Rohan McLure
2022-09-12 9:42 ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-08-24 2:05 ` [PATCH v4 06/20] powerpc: Remove direct call to mmap2 syscall handlers Rohan McLure
2022-09-12 9:47 ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-09-15 5:06 ` Rohan McLure
2022-08-24 2:05 ` [PATCH v4 07/20] powerpc: Adopt SYSCALL_DEFINE for arch-specific " Rohan McLure
2022-09-12 10:04 ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-08-24 2:05 ` [PATCH v4 08/20] powerpc: Include all arch-specific syscall prototypes Rohan McLure
2022-09-12 10:33 ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-09-13 7:09 ` Rohan McLure
2022-08-24 2:05 ` [PATCH v4 09/20] powerpc: Enable compile-time check for syscall handlers Rohan McLure
2022-09-12 10:42 ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-09-13 2:29 ` Michael Ellerman
2022-08-24 2:05 ` [PATCH v4 10/20] powerpc: Use common syscall handler type Rohan McLure
2022-09-12 10:56 ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-09-15 5:45 ` Rohan McLure
2022-09-16 1:02 ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-08-24 2:05 ` [PATCH v4 11/20] powerpc: Add ZEROIZE_GPRS macros for register clears Rohan McLure
2022-09-12 11:09 ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-09-15 5:47 ` Rohan McLure
2022-08-24 2:05 ` [PATCH v4 12/20] Revert "powerpc/syscall: Save r3 in regs->orig_r3" Rohan McLure
2022-09-12 11:14 ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-08-24 2:05 ` [PATCH v4 13/20] powerpc: Provide syscall wrapper Rohan McLure
2022-09-12 11:26 ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-08-24 2:05 ` [PATCH v4 14/20] powerpc/64s: Clear/restore caller gprs in syscall interrupt/return Rohan McLure
2022-09-12 11:47 ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-08-24 2:05 ` [PATCH v4 15/20] powerpc/64s: Use {ZEROIZE,SAVE,REST}_GPRS macros in sc, scv 0 handlers Rohan McLure
2022-09-12 11:49 ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-08-24 2:05 ` [PATCH v4 16/20] powerpc/32: Clarify interrupt restores with REST_GPR macro in entry_32.S Rohan McLure
2022-08-24 2:05 ` [PATCH v4 17/20] powerpc/64e: Clarify register saves and clears with {SAVE,ZEROIZE}_GPRS Rohan McLure
2022-09-12 12:17 ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-08-24 2:05 ` [PATCH v4 18/20] powerpc/64s: Fix comment on interrupt handler prologue Rohan McLure
2022-09-12 11:51 ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-08-24 2:05 ` [PATCH v4 19/20] powerpc/64s: Clear gprs on interrupt routine entry in Book3S Rohan McLure
2022-09-12 12:15 ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-09-15 6:55 ` Rohan McLure
2022-09-16 0:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-08-24 2:05 ` [PATCH v4 20/20] powerpc/64e: Clear gprs on interrupt routine entry Rohan McLure
2022-09-12 0:55 ` [PATCH v4 00/20] powerpc: Syscall wrapper and register clearing Rohan McLure
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220824020548.62625-4-rmclure@linux.ibm.com \
--to=rmclure@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).