From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46AD9ECAAD5 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2022 18:36:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4MFQQs4Y4zz3c73 for ; Sun, 28 Aug 2022 04:36:53 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=QrYiDhTE; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=145.40.68.75; helo=ams.source.kernel.org; envelope-from=pali@kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=QrYiDhTE; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [145.40.68.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4MFQQ81zTtz2yT0 for ; Sun, 28 Aug 2022 04:36:16 +1000 (AEST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F868B80955; Sat, 27 Aug 2022 18:36:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C51BCC433C1; Sat, 27 Aug 2022 18:36:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1661625371; bh=RS2oGCSax7wgaznwlTTyAu1eK0J8FoYLL+3Yvwuk+4w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=QrYiDhTE6woXxQswN4Vxs5HpiKUQ/Vv8931U1bf/J5qWjiWjdg76yQfoq65q4kT8k BOcUobbZPgqXIn0ti+qH96wnoTK+uxmVdGAHr1whdaiUReBm9QfPorg37gnZFUE7rd 0dmX1+upXGgC7U5oMS2zEPZiKlbz1SvCQXNPgUcMtBYBaskUbIPVbal56P0WNS1L8A FlU1KTNgWx1qYuUay33MCNCakQinl8yRAUnJQYQRaBLM/X7TbLrqFknuHKie1vcE1H 9hf5dlBbRtg2qG7yvlj0PQhEeVoNKXUFj4Vpmm/Qu+CBk3mgCVFkCzS7ImNHXMs4xr fGqCNx327/AoQ== Received: by pali.im (Postfix) id 23064C7A; Sat, 27 Aug 2022 20:36:08 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2022 20:36:08 +0200 From: Pali =?utf-8?B?Um9ow6Fy?= To: Christophe Leroy Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc/boot: Don't always pass -mcpu=powerpc when building 32-bit uImage Message-ID: <20220827183608.ezljs2houkd32764@pali> References: <20220820105200.30425-1-pali@kernel.org> <20220827133900.16634-1-pali@kernel.org> <63f4bce4-7965-9bc6-2104-42e26acd0208@csgroup.eu> <20220827173610.7bdp7zychwu2u5i6@pali> <1da78077-a050-a391-a002-9e25eabc89d1@csgroup.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1da78077-a050-a391-a002-9e25eabc89d1@csgroup.eu> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Paul Mackerras , Joel Stanley , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Saturday 27 August 2022 18:32:42 Christophe Leroy wrote: > Le 27/08/2022 à 19:36, Pali Rohár a écrit : > > On Saturday 27 August 2022 17:31:10 Christophe Leroy wrote: > >> Le 27/08/2022 à 15:39, Pali Rohár a écrit : > >>> For 32-bit uImage try to use CONFIG_TARGET_CPU option for -mcpu. This fixes > >>> following compiler error when building kernel with powerpc e500 SPE capable > >>> cross compilers: > >>> > >>> BOOTAS arch/powerpc/boot/crt0.o > >>> powerpc-linux-gnuspe-gcc: error: unrecognized argument in option ‘-mcpu=powerpc’ > >>> powerpc-linux-gnuspe-gcc: note: valid arguments to ‘-mcpu=’ are: 8540 8548 native > >>> make[1]: *** [arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile:231: arch/powerpc/boot/crt0.o] Error 1 > >>> > >>> For 64-bit uImage and 64-bit kernels with 32-bit uImage wrapper there is no > >>> change. > >>> > >>> Similar change was already introduced for the main powerpc Makefile in > >>> commit 446cda1b21d9 ("powerpc/32: Don't always pass -mcpu=powerpc to the > >>> compiler"). > >>> > >>> Fixes: 40a75584e526 ("powerpc/boot: Build wrapper for an appropriate CPU") > >>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > >>> Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár > >>> --- > >>> arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile | 8 ++++++++ > >>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile > >>> index a9cd2ea4a861..f56a5f90a5d8 100644 > >>> --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile > >>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile > >>> @@ -44,8 +44,16 @@ else > >>> BOOTCFLAGS += -m64 -mcpu=powerpc64 > >>> endif > >>> else > >>> +ifdef CONFIG_PPC32 > >>> +ifdef CONFIG_TARGET_CPU_BOOL > >>> +BOOTCFLAGS += -m32 -mcpu=$(CONFIG_TARGET_CPU) > >>> +else > >>> +BOOTCFLAGS += -m32 -mcpu=powerpc > >> > >> You can't do that. You get here only if user has selected > >> TOOLCHAIN_DEFAULT_CPU, in which case you don't want to for -mcpu=powerpc. > > > > So do I understand it correctly that in this branch I should omit -mcpu=powerpc? > > Correct. Ok, I will fix it in v3. > > > >> -mcpu=powerpc is set when user selects CONFIG_POWERPC_CPU, in which case > >> CONFIG_TARGET_CPU_BOOL is set as well. > >> > >>> +endif > >>> +else > >>> BOOTCFLAGS += -m32 -mcpu=powerpc > >> > >> Same, for PPC64 I think you don't want that either, unless the > >> CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU has been selected in which case > >> CONFIG_TARGET_CPU_BOOL is not set. > >> > >> When CONFIG_TARGET_CPU_BOOL is set for PPC64 you also want > >> -mcpu=$(CONFIG_TARGET_CPU) > > > > I understand that this branch is called for PPC64 build with 32-bit > > uImage wrapper. So in this case should not be used TARGET_CPU as it > > would be 64-bit and not 32-bit as requited for 32-bit uImage wrapper. > > Why ? > > -mcpu=e6500 -m32 works as far as I can see. Hm... I did not know that. Ok, if you want I will put it into -m32 -mcpu=$(CONFIG_TARGET_CPU) branch too. > > > > Anyway, in this change I'm touching only PPC32 build, so all PPC64 stay > > as it was before. > > > >>> endif > >>> +endif > >>> > >>> BOOTCFLAGS += -isystem $(shell $(BOOTCC) -print-file-name=include) > >>>