From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7EE7ECAAD4 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 12:53:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4MGVk73MCnz3fL4 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 22:53:51 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=CbUwP42f; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=flex--elver.bounces.google.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::114a; helo=mail-yw1-x114a.google.com; envelope-from=3lrumywukdfmz6gzc19916z.x97638fiaax-yzg63ded.9k6vwd.9c1@flex--elver.bounces.google.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=CbUwP42f; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-yw1-x114a.google.com (mail-yw1-x114a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::114a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4MGVbt3Vb8z3bbP for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 22:48:26 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-yw1-x114a.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-3328a211611so126908087b3.5 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 05:48:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:from:to:cc; bh=17GhIUVsdBD381xCSlsSf/bvMmuZOpgOvCsizfGJYww=; b=CbUwP42fuhmKg7ri7biMklFhB21W8cZzoP21+kt7Lgj6pRAyQfpzbZRWFbKeP6coDy AtkU/EIId8EZZt3IqUVsnXV5/PdeWQ/wbj3+W3aWt+UGVld9yGpyxTMNZ+LkqFqFDq4E Eg6dryn4nCZzZyYEDkk4dENmaVGKAEjjahQAFSW9MrwIn2ia3Ddf8nIbwrLhCtzzbI6c JLfLxik35LBKo1sshesg7tGD+yKVjyy6SkFYmLaXuEjFwS58Wn8DixsyUbFkK1+1u4L0 yG9CGURYktVy3sgJ3tVijbDxB25JjEwg6LeoC3rHTdBX+q3W9l3w84Qs4AN3cxM2jwfa 1Pqg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=17GhIUVsdBD381xCSlsSf/bvMmuZOpgOvCsizfGJYww=; b=Dyr3jWp21DgpH3Q9jaPD1A+8sOg9kQEbIT4WIn3WTHuA/bjBCO8XPvDzCi8shazzJu SDUYwvBShOWsUR1DT90uLH2SyNUlYFWCy8GunJPWaeLRGGed2gWK06Lg+stePozyThHO xdzGeLyvkXsLTCw3A5SCYXeRrCWHQQTeFXomuKx+CHoDGsve3xywabLJSV5EoRK20Iue lLcUb6tSnE1E8U6cPxH/S7KTAjR0XXsDJ5jRK2oCJA8E4m+6QUiqiATvsyn071g1Fdo1 N6nnoiOVPEv21WA1nHUqg/57yxF7k5K6YVPjSM7BFYxeHD4O/5NcsHia2EZQMFWFow4j xqvw== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo1HbwVGRxDMWOspUwgTYaKxgqE/0q9tcKjxFM950Jdh4MvleCba RiR48Q+X7PckFe61ltkiolCLY1mymg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR7saRNQPyfeUGNlvdKaMJxYtoC1JW5xi3rwIoqgRCRjBdEPFh2wH5NnVmpB77WBemcvNGm+4C/jLw== X-Received: from elver.muc.corp.google.com ([2a00:79e0:9c:201:196d:4fc7:fa9c:62e3]) (user=elver job=sendgmr) by 2002:a0d:f402:0:b0:33c:eda4:8557 with SMTP id d2-20020a0df402000000b0033ceda48557mr9486024ywf.183.1661777302876; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 05:48:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 14:47:14 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20220829124719.675715-1-elver@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20220829124719.675715-1-elver@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.37.2.672.g94769d06f0-goog Message-ID: <20220829124719.675715-10-elver@google.com> Subject: [PATCH v4 09/14] powerpc/hw_breakpoint: Avoid relying on caller synchronization From: Marco Elver To: elver@google.com, Peter Zijlstra , Frederic Weisbecker , Ingo Molnar Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , Ian Rogers , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Shishkin , x86@kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, Namhyung Kim , Thomas Gleixner , Jiri Olsa , Dmitry Vyukov Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Internal data structures (cpu_bps, task_bps) of powerpc's hw_breakpoint implementation have relied on nr_bp_mutex serializing access to them. Before overhauling synchronization of kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c, introduce 2 spinlocks to synchronize cpu_bps and task_bps respectively, thus avoiding reliance on callers synchronizing powerpc's hw_breakpoint. Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov Signed-off-by: Marco Elver Acked-by: Dmitry Vyukov Acked-by: Ian Rogers --- v2: * New patch. --- arch/powerpc/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c index 2669f80b3a49..8db1a15d7acb 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include @@ -129,7 +130,14 @@ struct breakpoint { bool ptrace_bp; }; +/* + * While kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c does its own synchronization, we cannot + * rely on it safely synchronizing internals here; however, we can rely on it + * not requesting more breakpoints than available. + */ +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(cpu_bps_lock); static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct breakpoint *, cpu_bps[HBP_NUM_MAX]); +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(task_bps_lock); static LIST_HEAD(task_bps); static struct breakpoint *alloc_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp) @@ -174,7 +182,9 @@ static int task_bps_add(struct perf_event *bp) if (IS_ERR(tmp)) return PTR_ERR(tmp); + spin_lock(&task_bps_lock); list_add(&tmp->list, &task_bps); + spin_unlock(&task_bps_lock); return 0; } @@ -182,6 +192,7 @@ static void task_bps_remove(struct perf_event *bp) { struct list_head *pos, *q; + spin_lock(&task_bps_lock); list_for_each_safe(pos, q, &task_bps) { struct breakpoint *tmp = list_entry(pos, struct breakpoint, list); @@ -191,6 +202,7 @@ static void task_bps_remove(struct perf_event *bp) break; } } + spin_unlock(&task_bps_lock); } /* @@ -200,12 +212,17 @@ static void task_bps_remove(struct perf_event *bp) static bool all_task_bps_check(struct perf_event *bp) { struct breakpoint *tmp; + bool ret = false; + spin_lock(&task_bps_lock); list_for_each_entry(tmp, &task_bps, list) { - if (!can_co_exist(tmp, bp)) - return true; + if (!can_co_exist(tmp, bp)) { + ret = true; + break; + } } - return false; + spin_unlock(&task_bps_lock); + return ret; } /* @@ -215,13 +232,18 @@ static bool all_task_bps_check(struct perf_event *bp) static bool same_task_bps_check(struct perf_event *bp) { struct breakpoint *tmp; + bool ret = false; + spin_lock(&task_bps_lock); list_for_each_entry(tmp, &task_bps, list) { if (tmp->bp->hw.target == bp->hw.target && - !can_co_exist(tmp, bp)) - return true; + !can_co_exist(tmp, bp)) { + ret = true; + break; + } } - return false; + spin_unlock(&task_bps_lock); + return ret; } static int cpu_bps_add(struct perf_event *bp) @@ -234,6 +256,7 @@ static int cpu_bps_add(struct perf_event *bp) if (IS_ERR(tmp)) return PTR_ERR(tmp); + spin_lock(&cpu_bps_lock); cpu_bp = per_cpu_ptr(cpu_bps, bp->cpu); for (i = 0; i < nr_wp_slots(); i++) { if (!cpu_bp[i]) { @@ -241,6 +264,7 @@ static int cpu_bps_add(struct perf_event *bp) break; } } + spin_unlock(&cpu_bps_lock); return 0; } @@ -249,6 +273,7 @@ static void cpu_bps_remove(struct perf_event *bp) struct breakpoint **cpu_bp; int i = 0; + spin_lock(&cpu_bps_lock); cpu_bp = per_cpu_ptr(cpu_bps, bp->cpu); for (i = 0; i < nr_wp_slots(); i++) { if (!cpu_bp[i]) @@ -260,19 +285,25 @@ static void cpu_bps_remove(struct perf_event *bp) break; } } + spin_unlock(&cpu_bps_lock); } static bool cpu_bps_check(int cpu, struct perf_event *bp) { struct breakpoint **cpu_bp; + bool ret = false; int i; + spin_lock(&cpu_bps_lock); cpu_bp = per_cpu_ptr(cpu_bps, cpu); for (i = 0; i < nr_wp_slots(); i++) { - if (cpu_bp[i] && !can_co_exist(cpu_bp[i], bp)) - return true; + if (cpu_bp[i] && !can_co_exist(cpu_bp[i], bp)) { + ret = true; + break; + } } - return false; + spin_unlock(&cpu_bps_lock); + return ret; } static bool all_cpu_bps_check(struct perf_event *bp) @@ -286,10 +317,6 @@ static bool all_cpu_bps_check(struct perf_event *bp) return false; } -/* - * We don't use any locks to serialize accesses to cpu_bps or task_bps - * because are already inside nr_bp_mutex. - */ int arch_reserve_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp) { int ret; -- 2.37.2.672.g94769d06f0-goog