From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Zhuo Chen <chenzhuo.1@bytedance.com>
Cc: allenbh@gmail.com, dave.jiang@intel.com,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, jejb@linux.ibm.com, jdmason@kudzu.us,
james.smart@broadcom.com, fancer.lancer@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ntb@lists.linux.dev,
oohall@gmail.com, bhelgaas@google.com, dick.kennedy@broadcom.com,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] PCI/ERR: Clear fatal status in pcie_do_recovery()
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 16:08:53 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220922210853.GA1335665@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220901181634.99591-3-chenzhuo.1@bytedance.com>
On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 02:16:33AM +0800, Zhuo Chen wrote:
> When state is pci_channel_io_frozen in pcie_do_recovery(),
> the severity is fatal and fatal status should be cleared.
> So we add pci_aer_clear_fatal_status().
Seems sensible to me. Did you find this by code inspection or by
debugging a problem? If the latter, it would be nice to mention the
symptoms of the problem in the commit log.
> Since pcie_aer_is_native() in pci_aer_clear_fatal_status()
> and pci_aer_clear_nonfatal_status() contains the function of
> 'if (host->native_aer || pcie_ports_native)', so we move them
> out of it.
Wrap commit log to fill 75 columns.
> Signed-off-by: Zhuo Chen <chenzhuo.1@bytedance.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/pcie/err.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
> index 0c5a143025af..e0a8ade4c3fe 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
> @@ -243,10 +243,14 @@ pci_ers_result_t pcie_do_recovery(struct pci_dev *dev,
> * it is responsible for clearing this status. In that case, the
> * signaling device may not even be visible to the OS.
> */
> - if (host->native_aer || pcie_ports_native) {
> + if (host->native_aer || pcie_ports_native)
> pcie_clear_device_status(dev);
pcie_clear_device_status() doesn't check for pcie_aer_is_native()
internally, but after 068c29a248b6 ("PCI/ERR: Clear PCIe Device Status
errors only if OS owns AER") and aa344bc8b727 ("PCI/ERR: Clear AER
status only when we control AER"), both callers check before calling
it.
I think we should move the check inside pcie_clear_device_status().
That could be a separate preliminary patch.
There are a couple other places (aer_root_reset() and
get_port_device_capability()) that do the same check and could be
changed to use pcie_aer_is_native() instead. That could be another
preliminary patch.
> + if (state == pci_channel_io_frozen)
> + pci_aer_clear_fatal_status(dev);
> + else
> pci_aer_clear_nonfatal_status(dev);
> - }
> +
> pci_info(bridge, "device recovery successful\n");
> return status;
>
> --
> 2.30.1 (Apple Git-130)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-22 21:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-01 18:16 [PATCH 0/3] PCI/AER: Fix and optimize usage of status clear api Zhuo Chen
2022-09-01 18:16 ` [PATCH 1/3] PCI/AER: Use pci_aer_clear_uncorrect_error_status() to clear uncorrectable error status Zhuo Chen
2022-09-11 16:22 ` Serge Semin
2022-09-11 17:09 ` [External] " Zhuo Chen
2022-09-11 17:55 ` Serge Semin
2022-09-22 20:02 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-09-26 13:30 ` Zhuo Chen
2022-09-26 17:21 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-09-01 18:16 ` [PATCH 2/3] PCI/ERR: Clear fatal status in pcie_do_recovery() Zhuo Chen
2022-09-22 21:08 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2022-09-26 14:01 ` Zhuo Chen
2022-09-26 18:09 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-09-27 13:41 ` [External] " Zhuo Chen
2022-09-01 18:16 ` [PATCH 3/3] PCI/AER: Use pci_aer_raw_clear_status() to clear root port's AER error status Zhuo Chen
2022-09-22 21:50 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-09-26 14:16 ` Zhuo Chen
2022-09-26 17:22 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220922210853.GA1335665@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=allenbh@gmail.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=chenzhuo.1@bytedance.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dick.kennedy@broadcom.com \
--cc=fancer.lancer@gmail.com \
--cc=james.smart@broadcom.com \
--cc=jdmason@kudzu.us \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ntb@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oohall@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).