From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1DE1C4332F for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2022 23:26:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4N25k21hyrz3dsm for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2022 10:26:02 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=LA+sP5X0; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=139.178.84.217; helo=dfw.source.kernel.org; envelope-from=pali@kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=LA+sP5X0; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4N25j1406Zz3bhR for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2022 10:25:09 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0637E6176C; Tue, 1 Nov 2022 23:25:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3FC42C433C1; Tue, 1 Nov 2022 23:25:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1667345106; bh=y6Y9I/ABUdMHuo+uopOpBsdU+t60oaGbhI3WXNVdouA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=LA+sP5X07WKG0/kUsIJUsBpOwBWeg/nsoQj6lZmHYOY8ncPL6LzSxSGRPNU/QMOFS qv6gn344oUiw+t7wPpeG+2LETSwolXntgy3ohIasP8kOaRgW76sm5HpgGqZc+1e9Kq L/vYTaF00gdRcu0g8k9oO/b5jyz4Y3DJP71nIilFUSFtp1rIj9CcxFW6qmaVAfOXBd xJIsTAZpcXGhmCIc7wwwg8XZutg83KIFMahxctVWyMO/PHBRvTN/ZRkWv4kmNUQCxG C4T1U7YJKh5waZgw6eK4JIa+c/MKoDjmD6ZEdoaaNJP7Wxz17p+eNzAWBFjSvKFJ0J 8IfcjDcGPHkqw== Received: by pali.im (Postfix) id A57F17F8; Wed, 2 Nov 2022 00:25:03 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 00:25:03 +0100 From: Pali =?utf-8?B?Um9ow6Fy?= To: Christophe Leroy Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] powerpc/85xx: Mark mpc85xx_ds_pic_init() as static Message-ID: <20221101232503.qymzj7dypsehafvj@pali> References: <20220819191557.28116-1-pali@kernel.org> <20220819191557.28116-3-pali@kernel.org> <20220926094706.km22rqzuuulvfssq@pali> <20221016110529.76bcgq2v2h4pg2of@pali> <3111f16b-2e6d-c46f-67e9-6cb5fada4cc7@csgroup.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <3111f16b-2e6d-c46f-67e9-6cb5fada4cc7@csgroup.eu> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Sinan Akman , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Scott Wood , Paul Mackerras , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Sunday 16 October 2022 16:59:53 Christophe Leroy wrote: > Hello, > > Le 16/10/2022 à 13:05, Pali Rohár a écrit : > > Hello Christophe! Do you have any other comments for this patch series? > > I'm AFK for two weeks, but as far as I remember I don't have any more > comments. Hello! When you are back, could you look at my feedback to your comments? > > > > On Monday 26 September 2022 11:47:06 Pali Rohár wrote: > >> On Monday 26 September 2022 09:43:55 Christophe Leroy wrote: > >>> Le 19/08/2022 à 21:15, Pali Rohár a écrit : > >>>> Function mpc85xx_ds_pic_init() is not used out of the mpc85xx_ds.c file. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár > >>> > >>> This patch should be squashed into patch 1. > >> > >> No problem. Just to explain that I split those changes into different > >> patches because they touch different files and different board code. > >> And I thought that different things should be in different patches. > >> > >>>> --- > >>>> arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_ds.c | 2 +- > >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >>>> > >>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_ds.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_ds.c > >>>> index f8d2c97f39bd..9a6d637ef54a 100644 > >>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_ds.c > >>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_ds.c > >>>> @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static void mpc85xx_8259_cascade(struct irq_desc *desc) > >>>> } > >>>> #endif /* CONFIG_PPC_I8259 */ > >>>> > >>>> -void __init mpc85xx_ds_pic_init(void) > >>>> +static void __init mpc85xx_ds_pic_init(void) > >>>> { > >>>> struct mpic *mpic; > >>>> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_I8259