From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>,
Laurent Dufour <laurent.dufour@fr.ibm.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 13/17] powerpc/qspinlock: trylock and initial lock attempt may steal
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 12:31:33 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221114023137.2679627-15-npiggin@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221114023137.2679627-1-npiggin@gmail.com>
This gives trylock slightly more strength, and it also gives most
of the benefit of passing 'val' back through the slowpath without
the complexity.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/qspinlock.h | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
arch/powerpc/lib/qspinlock.c | 9 ++++++
2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/qspinlock.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/qspinlock.h
index 3eff2d875bb6..56638175e49b 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/qspinlock.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/qspinlock.h
@@ -5,6 +5,15 @@
#include <linux/compiler.h>
#include <asm/qspinlock_types.h>
+/*
+ * The trylock itself may steal. This makes trylocks slightly stronger, and
+ * might make spin locks slightly more efficient when stealing.
+ *
+ * This is compile-time, so if true then there may always be stealers, so the
+ * nosteal paths become unused.
+ */
+#define _Q_SPIN_TRY_LOCK_STEAL 1
+
static __always_inline int queued_spin_is_locked(struct qspinlock *lock)
{
return READ_ONCE(lock->val);
@@ -26,11 +35,12 @@ static __always_inline u32 queued_spin_encode_locked_val(void)
return _Q_LOCKED_VAL | (smp_processor_id() << _Q_OWNER_CPU_OFFSET);
}
-static __always_inline int queued_spin_trylock(struct qspinlock *lock)
+static __always_inline int __queued_spin_trylock_nosteal(struct qspinlock *lock)
{
u32 new = queued_spin_encode_locked_val();
u32 prev;
+ /* Trylock succeeds only when unlocked and no queued nodes */
asm volatile(
"1: lwarx %0,0,%1,%3 # queued_spin_trylock \n"
" cmpwi 0,%0,0 \n"
@@ -47,6 +57,38 @@ static __always_inline int queued_spin_trylock(struct qspinlock *lock)
return likely(prev == 0);
}
+static __always_inline int __queued_spin_trylock_steal(struct qspinlock *lock)
+{
+ u32 new = queued_spin_encode_locked_val();
+ u32 prev, tmp;
+
+ /* Trylock may get ahead of queued nodes if it finds unlocked */
+ asm volatile(
+"1: lwarx %0,0,%2,%5 # queued_spin_trylock \n"
+" andc. %1,%0,%4 \n"
+" bne- 2f \n"
+" and %1,%0,%4 \n"
+" or %1,%1,%3 \n"
+" stwcx. %1,0,%2 \n"
+" bne- 1b \n"
+"\t" PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER " \n"
+"2: \n"
+ : "=&r" (prev), "=&r" (tmp)
+ : "r" (&lock->val), "r" (new), "r" (_Q_TAIL_CPU_MASK),
+ "i" (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC64))
+ : "cr0", "memory");
+
+ return likely(!(prev & ~_Q_TAIL_CPU_MASK));
+}
+
+static __always_inline int queued_spin_trylock(struct qspinlock *lock)
+{
+ if (!_Q_SPIN_TRY_LOCK_STEAL)
+ return __queued_spin_trylock_nosteal(lock);
+ else
+ return __queued_spin_trylock_steal(lock);
+}
+
void queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock);
static __always_inline void queued_spin_lock(struct qspinlock *lock)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/qspinlock.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/qspinlock.c
index 51123240da8e..830a90a66f5f 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/lib/qspinlock.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/qspinlock.c
@@ -24,7 +24,11 @@ struct qnodes {
/* Tuning parameters */
static int steal_spins __read_mostly = (1<<5);
+#if _Q_SPIN_TRY_LOCK_STEAL == 1
+static const bool maybe_stealers = true;
+#else
static bool maybe_stealers __read_mostly = true;
+#endif
static int head_spins __read_mostly = (1<<8);
static bool pv_yield_owner __read_mostly = true;
@@ -527,6 +531,10 @@ void pv_spinlocks_init(void)
#include <linux/debugfs.h>
static int steal_spins_set(void *data, u64 val)
{
+#if _Q_SPIN_TRY_LOCK_STEAL == 1
+ /* MAYBE_STEAL remains true */
+ steal_spins = val;
+#else
static DEFINE_MUTEX(lock);
/*
@@ -551,6 +559,7 @@ static int steal_spins_set(void *data, u64 val)
steal_spins = val;
}
mutex_unlock(&lock);
+#endif
return 0;
}
--
2.37.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-14 2:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-14 2:31 [PATCH v2 00/17] powerpc: alternate queued spinlock implementation Nicholas Piggin
2022-11-14 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 01a/17] powerpc/qspinlock: prepare powerpc qspinlock implementation Nicholas Piggin
2022-11-14 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 01/17] powerpc/qspinlock: " Nicholas Piggin
2022-11-14 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 02/17] powerpc/qspinlock: add mcs queueing for contended waiters Nicholas Piggin
2022-11-14 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 03/17] powerpc/qspinlock: use a half-word store to unlock to avoid larx/stcx Nicholas Piggin
2022-11-14 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 04/17] powerpc/qspinlock: convert atomic operations to assembly Nicholas Piggin
2022-11-14 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 05/17] powerpc/qspinlock: allow new waiters to steal the lock before queueing Nicholas Piggin
2022-11-14 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 06/17] powerpc/qspinlock: theft prevention to control latency Nicholas Piggin
2022-11-14 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 07/17] powerpc/qspinlock: store owner CPU in lock word Nicholas Piggin
2022-11-14 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 08/17] powerpc/qspinlock: paravirt yield to lock owner Nicholas Piggin
2022-11-14 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 09/17] powerpc/qspinlock: implement option to yield to previous node Nicholas Piggin
2022-11-14 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 10/17] powerpc/qspinlock: allow stealing when head of queue yields Nicholas Piggin
2022-11-14 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 11/17] powerpc/qspinlock: allow propagation of yield CPU down the queue Nicholas Piggin
2022-11-14 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 12/17] powerpc/qspinlock: add ability to prod new queue head CPU Nicholas Piggin
2022-11-14 2:31 ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2022-11-14 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 14/17] powerpc/qspinlock: use spin_begin/end API Nicholas Piggin
2022-11-14 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 15/17] powerpc/qspinlock: reduce remote node steal spins Nicholas Piggin
2022-11-14 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 16/17] powerpc/qspinlock: allow indefinite spinning on a preempted owner Nicholas Piggin
2022-11-14 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 17/17] powerpc/qspinlock: provide accounting and options for sleepy locks Nicholas Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221114023137.2679627-15-npiggin@gmail.com \
--to=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=jniethe5@gmail.com \
--cc=laurent.dufour@fr.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).