From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B962C4708C for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 14:49:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4NRNbN0fR1z3bfZ for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 01:49:04 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=M7g4hFCn; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=M7g4hFCn; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com (client-ip=170.10.129.124; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com; envelope-from=david@redhat.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=M7g4hFCn; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=M7g4hFCn; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4NRNZL0NHyz2yxQ for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 01:48:09 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1670338087; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=/J/bI9dhyjQ/usSRNhI5biIirU1QHLlTc54Jeh9AEr0=; b=M7g4hFCnth3RIcNBBKeS8fcAGHHkW4q14jgjS0XzyVavv56h4gX6dnlIJPi1CjVxUOcnTP rr1Vw5jTA+qIojfFsLgOY/N4m4rPyEbSYnn4s35GTQAgjqP+eXoiJSDH/pwXMSxyP2Cbvo fVedjS5ObNbzQrRqPrRgedQfKkaWLWA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1670338087; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=/J/bI9dhyjQ/usSRNhI5biIirU1QHLlTc54Jeh9AEr0=; b=M7g4hFCnth3RIcNBBKeS8fcAGHHkW4q14jgjS0XzyVavv56h4gX6dnlIJPi1CjVxUOcnTP rr1Vw5jTA+qIojfFsLgOY/N4m4rPyEbSYnn4s35GTQAgjqP+eXoiJSDH/pwXMSxyP2Cbvo fVedjS5ObNbzQrRqPrRgedQfKkaWLWA= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-149-8CVFD73pPtiuCMFV0N15hg-1; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 09:48:01 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 8CVFD73pPtiuCMFV0N15hg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E4EA38164C3; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 14:48:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from t480s.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.193.173]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A3F6492B04; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 14:47:54 +0000 (UTC) From: David Hildenbrand To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH mm-unstable RFC 01/26] mm/debug_vm_pgtable: more pte_swp_exclusive() sanity checks Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2022 15:47:05 +0100 Message-Id: <20221206144730.163732-2-david@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20221206144730.163732-1-david@redhat.com> References: <20221206144730.163732-1-david@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.10 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Yang Shi , David Hildenbrand , Peter Xu , linux-mm@kvack.org, Nadav Amit , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Andrea Arcangeli , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, Hugh Dickins , linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, Mike Rapoport , Vlastimil Babka , Jason Gunthorpe , linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, John Hubbard , linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, openrisc@lists.librecores.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" We want to implement __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SWP_EXCLUSIVE on all architectures. Let's extend our sanity checks, especially testing that our PTE bit does not affect: * is_swap_pte() -> pte_present() and pte_none() * the swap entry + type * pte_swp_soft_dirty() Especially, the pfn_pte() is dodgy when the swap PTE layout differs heavily from ordinary PTEs. Let's properly construct a swap PTE from swap type+offset. Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand --- mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c index c631ade3f1d2..0506622016d9 100644 --- a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c +++ b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c @@ -807,13 +807,34 @@ static void __init pmd_swap_soft_dirty_tests(struct pgtable_debug_args *args) { static void __init pte_swap_exclusive_tests(struct pgtable_debug_args *args) { #ifdef __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SWP_EXCLUSIVE - pte_t pte = pfn_pte(args->fixed_pte_pfn, args->page_prot); + unsigned long max_swapfile_size = generic_max_swapfile_size(); + swp_entry_t entry, entry2; + pte_t pte; pr_debug("Validating PTE swap exclusive\n"); + + /* Create a swp entry with all possible bits set */ + entry = swp_entry((1 << MAX_SWAPFILES_SHIFT) - 1, + max_swapfile_size - 1); + + pte = swp_entry_to_pte(entry); + WARN_ON(pte_swp_exclusive(pte)); + WARN_ON(!is_swap_pte(pte)); + entry2 = pte_to_swp_entry(pte); + WARN_ON(memcmp(&entry, &entry2, sizeof(entry))); + pte = pte_swp_mkexclusive(pte); WARN_ON(!pte_swp_exclusive(pte)); + WARN_ON(!is_swap_pte(pte)); + WARN_ON(pte_swp_soft_dirty(pte)); + entry2 = pte_to_swp_entry(pte); + WARN_ON(memcmp(&entry, &entry2, sizeof(entry))); + pte = pte_swp_clear_exclusive(pte); WARN_ON(pte_swp_exclusive(pte)); + WARN_ON(!is_swap_pte(pte)); + entry2 = pte_to_swp_entry(pte); + WARN_ON(memcmp(&entry, &entry2, sizeof(entry))); #endif /* __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SWP_EXCLUSIVE */ } -- 2.38.1