From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C78BC61DA4 for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2023 22:32:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4P7D7p07KCz3f7X for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2023 09:32:54 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=aZZk0zcL; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=aZZk0zcL; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4P7D2b3rcjz3bfj for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2023 09:28:23 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 312MBiWR013946; Thu, 2 Feb 2023 22:28:20 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=f0YAfmQJVwXGkOVwMjqiCV7X+x2qPLNnsYTTjQJsP2A=; b=aZZk0zcLq3/OGPp/83V+0XxC0o7vNlojoe8fhWFD/cRHwiOCWd/xv2TvCCo3rEA3KmXg 6rRFpn7ctqZ0uF3gkKTaIJ7b8lnSiP2OSqdaV0B2VlJ3Vrao9se8L4qIiKg0KsPdDtx7 ajWTvbjuZtyleMDu2RsOiBvSRJw75KD5ZwZYToP/8BT9Cm0ZQFyKdJkB09heB8nZs5/4 Iz2Lkca61mUxA843upNjKd7+P8Jqzys2UimS24N6ZGNKCSqlHb7V+zIG8pTzz1s4ajZk j0cnfp8yPIQ9FWJIdH2mRwWLa3+wBc+l88haNqRZVhrmhanpV+p/K7T6k3ax5l9JeTC3 7Q== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3ngn628ub3-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 02 Feb 2023 22:28:20 +0000 Received: from m0098420.ppops.net (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 312MFEGw026079; Thu, 2 Feb 2023 22:28:19 GMT Received: from ppma03wdc.us.ibm.com (ba.79.3fa9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.63.121.186]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3ngn628uav-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 02 Feb 2023 22:28:19 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03wdc.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03wdc.us.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 312IUsdu007780; Thu, 2 Feb 2023 22:28:19 GMT Received: from smtprelay02.dal12v.mail.ibm.com ([9.208.130.97]) by ppma03wdc.us.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3ncvtf5sx3-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 02 Feb 2023 22:28:19 +0000 Received: from smtpav01.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav01.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com [10.39.53.228]) by smtprelay02.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 312MSIfO25690516 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 2 Feb 2023 22:28:18 GMT Received: from smtpav01.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E9DD5804B; Thu, 2 Feb 2023 22:28:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav01.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B5EC58059; Thu, 2 Feb 2023 22:28:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-6bf4d4cc-31f5-11b2-a85c-838e9310af65.ibm.com.com (unknown [9.211.158.218]) by smtpav01.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 2 Feb 2023 22:28:17 +0000 (GMT) From: Brian King To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Subject: [PATCH v2 4/6] hvcs: Get reference to tty in remove Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2023 16:28:02 -0600 Message-Id: <20230202222804.383229-5-brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20230202222804.383229-1-brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20230202222804.383229-1-brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: BY0t1Uh7jVTAl3HZl0xO-_17fbzg1NC8 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: KBspTYSofduU8T5FQogf2H-IsFMMY1Nw X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.219,Aquarius:18.0.930,Hydra:6.0.562,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2023-02-02_14,2023-02-02_01,2022-06-22_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2212070000 definitions=main-2302020196 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Brian King , mmc@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, brking@pobox.com Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Grab a reference to the tty when removing the hvcs to ensure it does not get freed unexpectedly. Signed-off-by: Brian King --- drivers/tty/hvc/hvcs.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvcs.c b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvcs.c index 5de7ad555540..04c58ac4fec2 100644 --- a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvcs.c +++ b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvcs.c @@ -813,7 +813,7 @@ static void hvcs_remove(struct vio_dev *dev) spin_lock_irqsave(&hvcsd->lock, flags); - tty = hvcsd->port.tty; + tty = tty_port_tty_get(&hvcsd->port); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hvcsd->lock, flags); @@ -828,8 +828,10 @@ static void hvcs_remove(struct vio_dev *dev) * hvcs_hangup. The tty should always be valid at this time unless a * simultaneous tty close already cleaned up the hvcs_struct. */ - if (tty) + if (tty) { tty_hangup(tty); + tty_kref_put(tty); + } printk(KERN_INFO "HVCS: vty-server@%X removed from the" " vio bus.\n", dev->unit_address); -- 2.31.1