From: "Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: Sinan Akman <sinan@writeme.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Scott Wood <oss@buserror.net>,
Martin Kennedy <hurricos@gmail.com>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] powerpc/85xx: p2020: Define just one machine description
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 21:18:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230213201820.xej7opc55e6obiti@pali> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fc688761-5854-a171-c5e9-fae9eb25e798@csgroup.eu>
On Monday 13 February 2023 20:08:52 Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Le 24/12/2022 à 22:14, Pali Rohár a écrit :
> > Combine machine descriptions and code of all P2020 boards into just one
> > generic unified P2020 machine description. This allows kernel to boot on
> > any P2020-based board with P2020 DTS file without need to patch kernel and
> > define a new machine description in 85xx powerpc platform directory.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/p2020.c | 83 +++++++----------------------
> > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/p2020.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/p2020.c
> > index adf3750abef9..b3fb600e1d83 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/p2020.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/p2020.c
> > @@ -156,83 +156,38 @@ static void __init p2020_setup_arch(void)
> > #endif
> > }
> >
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_MPC85xx_DS
> > -machine_arch_initcall(p2020_ds, mpc85xx_common_publish_devices);
> > -#endif /* CONFIG_MPC85xx_DS */
> > -
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_MPC85xx_RDB
> > -machine_arch_initcall(p2020_rdb, mpc85xx_common_publish_devices);
> > -machine_arch_initcall(p2020_rdb_pc, mpc85xx_common_publish_devices);
> > -#endif /* CONFIG_MPC85xx_RDB */
> > +machine_arch_initcall(p2020, mpc85xx_common_publish_devices);
> >
> > /*
> > * Called very early, device-tree isn't unflattened
> > */
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_MPC85xx_DS
> > -static int __init p2020_ds_probe(void)
> > -{
> > - return !!of_machine_is_compatible("fsl,P2020DS");
> > -}
> > -#endif /* CONFIG_MPC85xx_DS */
> > -
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_MPC85xx_RDB
> > -static int __init p2020_rdb_probe(void)
> > -{
> > - if (of_machine_is_compatible("fsl,P2020RDB"))
> > - return 1;
> > - return 0;
> > -}
> > -
> > -static int __init p2020_rdb_pc_probe(void)
> > +static int __init p2020_probe(void)
> > {
> > - if (of_machine_is_compatible("fsl,P2020RDB-PC"))
> > - return 1;
> > - return 0;
> > + struct device_node *p2020_cpu;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * There is no common compatible string for all P2020 boards.
> > + * The only common thing is "PowerPC,P2020@0" cpu node.
> > + * So check for P2020 board via this cpu node.
> > + */
> > + p2020_cpu = of_find_node_by_path("/cpus/PowerPC,P2020@0");
> > + if (!p2020_cpu)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + of_node_put(p2020_cpu);
>
> of_node_put() already checks for nullity of its parameter, so you can
> simplify stuff here, something like
>
> p2020_cpu = of_find_node_by_path("/cpus/PowerPC,P2020@0");
> of_node_put(p2020_cpu);
>
> return !!p2020_cpu;
Ok!
> > + return 1;
> > }
> > -#endif /* CONFIG_MPC85xx_RDB */
> > -
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_MPC85xx_DS
> > -define_machine(p2020_ds) {
> > - .name = "P2020 DS",
> > - .probe = p2020_ds_probe,
> > - .setup_arch = p2020_setup_arch,
> > - .init_IRQ = p2020_pic_init,
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_PCI
> > - .pcibios_fixup_bus = fsl_pcibios_fixup_bus,
> > - .pcibios_fixup_phb = fsl_pcibios_fixup_phb,
> > -#endif
> > - .get_irq = mpic_get_irq,
> > - .calibrate_decr = generic_calibrate_decr,
> > - .progress = udbg_progress,
> > -};
> > -#endif /* CONFIG_MPC85xx_DS */
> > -
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_MPC85xx_RDB
> > -define_machine(p2020_rdb) {
> > - .name = "P2020 RDB",
> > - .probe = p2020_rdb_probe,
> > - .setup_arch = p2020_setup_arch,
> > - .init_IRQ = p2020_pic_init,
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_PCI
> > - .pcibios_fixup_bus = fsl_pcibios_fixup_bus,
> > - .pcibios_fixup_phb = fsl_pcibios_fixup_phb,
> > -#endif
> > - .get_irq = mpic_get_irq,
> > - .calibrate_decr = generic_calibrate_decr,
> > - .progress = udbg_progress,
> > -};
> >
> > -define_machine(p2020_rdb_pc) {
> > - .name = "P2020RDB-PC",
> > - .probe = p2020_rdb_pc_probe,
> > +define_machine(p2020) {
> > + .name = "Freescale P2020",
> > + .probe = p2020_probe,
> > .setup_arch = p2020_setup_arch,
> > .init_IRQ = p2020_pic_init,
> > #ifdef CONFIG_PCI
> > .pcibios_fixup_bus = fsl_pcibios_fixup_bus,
> > - .pcibios_fixup_phb = fsl_pcibios_fixup_phb,
> > + .pcibios_fixup_phb = fsl_pcibios_fixup_phb,
> > #endif
> > .get_irq = mpic_get_irq,
> > .calibrate_decr = generic_calibrate_decr,
> > .progress = udbg_progress,
> > };
> > -#endif /* CONFIG_MPC85xx_RDB */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-13 20:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-24 21:14 [PATCH v2 0/8] powerpc/85xx: p2020: Create one unified machine description Pali Rohár
2022-12-24 21:14 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] powerpc/85xx: Mark mpc85xx_rdb_pic_init() as static Pali Rohár
2022-12-24 21:14 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] powerpc/85xx: Mark mpc85xx_ds_pic_init() " Pali Rohár
2022-12-24 21:14 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] powerpc/85xx: p2020: Move all P2020 machine descriptions to p2020.c Pali Rohár
2023-02-03 19:08 ` Pali Rohár
2023-02-13 20:05 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-02-13 20:15 ` Pali Rohár
2023-02-14 5:49 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-12-24 21:14 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] powerpc/85xx: p2020: Move i8259 code into own function Pali Rohár
2023-02-13 20:06 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-02-13 20:17 ` Pali Rohár
2022-12-24 21:14 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] powerpc/85xx: p2020: Unify .setup_arch and .init_IRQ callbacks Pali Rohár
2022-12-24 21:14 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] powerpc/85xx: p2020: Define just one machine description Pali Rohár
2023-02-13 20:08 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-02-13 20:18 ` Pali Rohár [this message]
2022-12-24 21:14 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] powerpc/85xx: p2020: Enable boards by new config option CONFIG_PPC_P2020 Pali Rohár
2022-12-24 21:14 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] powerpc: dts: turris1x.dts: Remove "fsl,P2020RDB-PC" compatible string Pali Rohár
2023-01-22 11:16 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] powerpc/85xx: p2020: Create one unified machine description Pali Rohár
2023-01-23 14:32 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-01-23 20:09 ` Pali Rohár
2023-02-09 0:15 ` Pali Rohár
2023-02-13 19:58 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-02-13 20:11 ` Pali Rohár
2023-02-14 5:47 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-02-15 18:57 ` Pali Rohár
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230213201820.xej7opc55e6obiti@pali \
--to=pali@kernel.org \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=hurricos@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=oss@buserror.net \
--cc=sinan@writeme.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).