From: Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay <devnull+nathanl.linux.ibm.com@kernel.org>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>,
Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.ibm.com>,
Nick Child <nnac123@linux.ibm.com>,
Andrew Donnellan <ajd@linux.ibm.com>,
Scott Cheloha <cheloha@linux.ibm.com>,
Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/8] powerpc/rtas: use memmove for potentially overlapping buffer copy
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2023 15:33:41 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230220-rtas-queue-for-6-4-v1-2-010e4416f13f@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230220-rtas-queue-for-6-4-v1-0-010e4416f13f@linux.ibm.com>
From: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>
Using memcpy() isn't safe when buf is identical to rtas_err_buf, which
can happen during boot before slab is up. Full context which may not
be obvious from the diff:
if (altbuf) {
buf = altbuf;
} else {
buf = rtas_err_buf;
if (slab_is_available())
buf = kmalloc(RTAS_ERROR_LOG_MAX, GFP_ATOMIC);
}
if (buf)
memcpy(buf, rtas_err_buf, RTAS_ERROR_LOG_MAX);
This was found by inspection and I'm not aware of it causing problems
in practice. It appears to have been introduced by commit
033ef338b6e0 ("powerpc: Merge rtas.c into arch/powerpc/kernel"); the
old ppc64 version of this code did not have this problem.
Use memmove() instead.
Fixes: 033ef338b6e0 ("powerpc: Merge rtas.c into arch/powerpc/kernel")
Signed-off-by: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c
index 31175b34856a..9256cfaa8b6f 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c
@@ -981,7 +981,7 @@ static char *__fetch_rtas_last_error(char *altbuf)
buf = kmalloc(RTAS_ERROR_LOG_MAX, GFP_ATOMIC);
}
if (buf)
- memcpy(buf, rtas_err_buf, RTAS_ERROR_LOG_MAX);
+ memmove(buf, rtas_err_buf, RTAS_ERROR_LOG_MAX);
}
return buf;
--
2.39.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-06 21:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-06 21:33 [PATCH 0/8] RTAS changes for 6.4 Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2023-03-06 21:33 ` [PATCH 1/8] powerpc/rtas: ensure 8-byte alignment for struct rtas_args Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2023-03-23 4:00 ` Andrew Donnellan
2023-03-06 21:33 ` Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay [this message]
2023-03-23 4:09 ` [PATCH 2/8] powerpc/rtas: use memmove for potentially overlapping buffer copy Andrew Donnellan
2023-03-06 21:33 ` [PATCH 3/8] powerpc/rtas: rtas_call_unlocked() kerneldoc Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2023-03-23 4:15 ` Andrew Donnellan
2023-03-06 21:33 ` [PATCH 4/8] powerpc/rtas: fix miswording in rtas_function kerneldoc Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2023-03-23 0:17 ` Andrew Donnellan
2023-03-06 21:33 ` [PATCH 5/8] powerpc/rtas: rename va_rtas_call_unlocked() to va_rtas_call() Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2023-03-23 4:17 ` Andrew Donnellan
2023-03-23 16:11 ` Nathan Lynch
2023-03-29 12:24 ` Michael Ellerman
2023-03-06 21:33 ` [PATCH 6/8] powerpc/rtas: lockdep annotations Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2023-03-23 6:01 ` Andrew Donnellan
2023-03-06 21:33 ` [PATCH 7/8] powerpc/rtas: warn on unsafe argument to rtas_call_unlocked() Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2023-03-23 4:25 ` Andrew Donnellan
2023-03-23 12:17 ` Nathan Lynch
2023-03-24 0:56 ` Nathan Lynch
2023-03-29 12:20 ` Michael Ellerman
2023-03-29 16:23 ` Nathan Lynch
2023-03-06 21:33 ` [PATCH 8/8] powerpc/rtas: consume retry statuses in sys_rtas() Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2023-03-23 6:26 ` Andrew Donnellan
2023-03-23 19:39 ` Nathan Lynch
2023-03-23 9:44 ` Michael Ellerman
2023-03-23 13:40 ` Nathan Lynch
2024-01-25 15:55 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-01-25 16:33 ` Nathan Lynch
2024-01-25 16:46 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-01-25 17:23 ` Nathan Lynch
2023-04-06 1:09 ` (subset) [PATCH 0/8] RTAS changes for 6.4 Michael Ellerman
2023-04-26 12:12 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230220-rtas-queue-for-6-4-v1-2-010e4416f13f@linux.ibm.com \
--to=devnull+nathanl.linux.ibm.com@kernel.org \
--cc=ajd@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cheloha@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=ldufour@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=nathanl@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=nnac123@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=tyreld@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).