linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ndesaulniers@google.com
To: "Borislav Petkov (AMD)" <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	x86@kernel.org, Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>, Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>,
	Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] start_kernel: add no_stack_protector fn attr
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 11:32:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230412-no_stackp-v1-1-46a69b507a4b@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230412-no_stackp-v1-0-46a69b507a4b@google.com>

Back during the discussion of
commit a9a3ed1eff36 ("x86: Fix early boot crash on gcc-10, third try")
we discussed the need for a function attribute to control the omission
of stack protectors on a per-function basis; at the time Clang had
support for no_stack_protector but GCC did not. This was fixed in
gcc-11. Now that the function attribute is available, let's start using
it.

Callers of boot_init_stack_canary need to use this function attribute
unless they're compiled with -fno-stack-protector, otherwise the canary
stored in the stack slot of the caller will differ upon the call to
boot_init_stack_canary. This will lead to a call to __stack_chk_fail
then panic.

Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94722
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20200316130414.GC12561@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net/
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c           |  1 +
 include/linux/compiler_attributes.h | 12 ++++++++++++
 init/main.c                         |  3 ++-
 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
index 6b90f10a6c81..7d4c12b1abb7 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
@@ -1603,6 +1603,7 @@ static void add_cpu_to_masks(int cpu)
 }
 
 /* Activate a secondary processor. */
+__no_stack_protector
 void start_secondary(void *unused)
 {
 	unsigned int cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
diff --git a/include/linux/compiler_attributes.h b/include/linux/compiler_attributes.h
index e659cb6fded3..84864767a56a 100644
--- a/include/linux/compiler_attributes.h
+++ b/include/linux/compiler_attributes.h
@@ -255,6 +255,18 @@
  */
 #define __noreturn                      __attribute__((__noreturn__))
 
+/*
+ * Optional: only supported since GCC >= 11.1, clang >= 7.0.
+ *
+ *   gcc: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Common-Function-Attributes.html#index-no_005fstack_005fprotector-function-attribute
+ *   clang: https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html#no-stack-protector-safebuffers
+ */
+#if __has_attribute(__no_stack_protector__)
+# define __no_stack_protector		__attribute__((__no_stack_protector__))
+#else
+# define __no_stack_protector
+#endif
+
 /*
  * Optional: not supported by gcc.
  *
diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c
index bb87b789c543..213baf7b8cb1 100644
--- a/init/main.c
+++ b/init/main.c
@@ -941,7 +941,8 @@ static void __init print_unknown_bootoptions(void)
 	memblock_free(unknown_options, len);
 }
 
-asmlinkage __visible void __init __no_sanitize_address start_kernel(void)
+asmlinkage __visible __init __no_sanitize_address __no_stack_protector
+void start_kernel(void)
 {
 	char *command_line;
 	char *after_dashes;

-- 
2.40.0.577.gac1e443424-goog


  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-12 18:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-12 18:32 [PATCH 0/2] start_kernel: omit stack canary ndesaulniers
2023-04-12 18:32 ` ndesaulniers [this message]
2023-04-12 20:22   ` [PATCH 1/2] start_kernel: add no_stack_protector fn attr Miguel Ojeda
2023-04-12 22:03   ` Nathan Chancellor
2023-04-14  0:09   ` Michael Ellerman
2023-04-12 18:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] start_kernel: omit prevent_tail_call_optimization for newer toolchains ndesaulniers
2023-04-12 22:04   ` Nathan Chancellor
2023-04-13  7:51 ` [PATCH 0/2] start_kernel: omit stack canary Peter Zijlstra
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-04-17 21:54 ndesaulniers
2023-04-17 21:54 ` [PATCH 1/2] start_kernel: add no_stack_protector fn attr ndesaulniers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230412-no_stackp-v1-1-46a69b507a4b@google.com \
    --to=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=trix@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).