From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: ndesaulniers@google.com
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
"Borislav Petkov \(AMD\)" <bp@alien8.de>,
Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] start_kernel: omit prevent_tail_call_optimization for newer toolchains
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 15:04:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230412220408.GB1120303@dev-arch.thelio-3990X> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230412-no_stackp-v1-2-46a69b507a4b@google.com>
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 11:32:13AM -0700, ndesaulniers@google.com wrote:
> prevent_tail_call_optimization was added in
> commit a9a3ed1eff36 ("x86: Fix early boot crash on gcc-10, third try")
> to work around stack canaries getting inserted into functions that would
> initialize the stack canary in the first place.
>
> Now that we have no_stack_protector function attribute (gcc-11+,
> clang-7+) and use it on start_kernel, remove the call to
> prevent_tail_call_optimization such that we may one day remove it
> outright.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
> ---
> init/main.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c
> index 213baf7b8cb1..c8503d02dfa6 100644
> --- a/init/main.c
> +++ b/init/main.c
> @@ -1152,7 +1152,12 @@ void start_kernel(void)
> /* Do the rest non-__init'ed, we're now alive */
> arch_call_rest_init();
>
> + /* Avoid stack canaries in callers of boot_init_stack_canary for gcc-10
> + * and older.
> + */
> +#if !__has_attribute(__no_stack_protector__)
> prevent_tail_call_optimization();
> +#endif
> }
>
> /* Call all constructor functions linked into the kernel. */
>
> --
> 2.40.0.577.gac1e443424-goog
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-12 22:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-12 18:32 [PATCH 0/2] start_kernel: omit stack canary ndesaulniers
2023-04-12 18:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] start_kernel: add no_stack_protector fn attr ndesaulniers
2023-04-12 20:22 ` Miguel Ojeda
2023-04-12 22:03 ` Nathan Chancellor
2023-04-14 0:09 ` Michael Ellerman
2023-04-12 18:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] start_kernel: omit prevent_tail_call_optimization for newer toolchains ndesaulniers
2023-04-12 22:04 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2023-04-13 7:51 ` [PATCH 0/2] start_kernel: omit stack canary Peter Zijlstra
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-04-17 21:54 ndesaulniers
2023-04-17 21:54 ` [PATCH 2/2] start_kernel: omit prevent_tail_call_optimization for newer toolchains ndesaulniers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230412220408.GB1120303@dev-arch.thelio-3990X \
--to=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=trix@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox