From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A3E4C77B6C for ; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 03:48:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4PxltY43G8z3fDD for ; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 13:48:53 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=Intel header.b=d8vqzsAu; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.helo=mga12.intel.com (client-ip=192.55.52.136; helo=mga12.intel.com; envelope-from=ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=Intel header.b=d8vqzsAu; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mga12.intel.com (mga12.intel.com [192.55.52.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Pxlsc1c4tz3cK6 for ; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 13:48:02 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1681357684; x=1712893684; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=gPdSr4BN4qgnYBujHfxo+7EEfLMISEH3ed+UIrZgyk0=; b=d8vqzsAuSPpRiH2YhfQmuD9g7+Xiw+tflNznuHWnYnvlw3NrcRD5qnnt nw+Eadgu5Jh38XEnwapSzw1ABTfQMxrYbky4nmyjFKQAxXWKB/Ido4CVO Msm5PCjEckpE9Dqh3OxwcJEkON60Gb0frvY1HFeDumDiDzRHQuAqZrAC0 Zk5/YW+IXFPD2B6hsusnzbGORS7qzwQwb/JZwO1eSEntk8PCKbNpwKZj0 BjoW1PT3HErtAqbBOkAoA0HID/BBG6q/raIEfkMzYuSWYUYaWwVn9OdVa YnAE751vA732vTzHU7bib2UmajkCXtrucC5xCFZDkQIeOaAWnsftfuI67 A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10678"; a="323699892" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.98,339,1673942400"; d="scan'208";a="323699892" Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 Apr 2023 20:47:42 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10678"; a="813223452" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.98,339,1673942400"; d="scan'208";a="813223452" Received: from ranerica-svr.sc.intel.com ([172.25.110.23]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 Apr 2023 20:47:41 -0700 Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 20:58:44 -0700 From: Ricardo Neri To: Tony Luck , Dave Hansen , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Reinette Chatre , Dan Williams , Len Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/24] x86: Implement an HPET-based hardlockup detector Message-ID: <20230413035844.GA31620@ranerica-svr.sc.intel.com> References: <20230301234753.28582-1-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230301234753.28582-1-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "Ravi V. Shankar" , Andi Kleen , Ricardo Neri , Stephane Eranian , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 03:47:29PM -0800, Ricardo Neri wrote: > Hi x86 trusted reviewers, > > This is the seventh version of this patchset. I acknowledge that it took me > a long time to post a new version. Sorry! I will commit time to continue > working on this series with high priority and I will post a new series soon > after receiving your new feedback. > > Although this series touches several subsystems, I plan to send it to the > x86 maintainers because a) the series does not make much sense if split > into subsystems, b) Thomas Gleixner has reviewed previous versions, and c) > he has contributed to all the subsystems I modify. > > Tony Luck has kindly reviewed previous versions of the series and I carried > his Reviewed-by tags. This version, however, has new patches that also need > review. > > I seek to collect the Reviewed-by tags from the x86 trusted reviewers for > the following patches: > + arch/x86: 4, 5 > + Intel IOMMU: 6, > + AMD IOMMU: 9, 10, 11, > + NMI watchdog: 23 and 24. Hello, checking if there is any feedback on these patches that I plan to send to the x86 maintainer. I am still seeking to collect the Reviewed-by: tags from the x86 trusted reviewers. Thanks in advance! BR, Ricardo