From: Rohan McLure <rmclure@linux.ibm.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Rohan McLure <rmclure@ibm.com>,
arnd@arndb.de, npiggin@gmail.com,
Rohan McLure <rmclure@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 07/12] powerpc: powernv: Fix KCSAN datarace warnings on idle_state contention
Date: Mon, 8 May 2023 12:01:15 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230508020120.218494-8-rmclure@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230508020120.218494-1-rmclure@linux.ibm.com>
The idle_state entry in the PACA on PowerNV features a bit which is
atomically tested and set through ldarx/stdcx. to be used as a spinlock.
This lock then guards access to other bit fields of idle_state. KCSAN
cannot differentiate between any of these bitfield accesses as they all
are implemented by 8-byte store/load instructions, thus cores contending
on the bit-lock appear to data race with modifications to idle_state.
Separate the bit-lock entry from the data guarded by the lock to avoid
the possibility of data races being detected by KCSAN.
Suggested-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rohan McLure <rmclure@ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/paca.h | 1 +
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c | 20 +++++++++++---------
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/paca.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/paca.h
index da0377f46597..cb325938766a 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/paca.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/paca.h
@@ -191,6 +191,7 @@ struct paca_struct {
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_POWERNV
/* PowerNV idle fields */
/* PNV_CORE_IDLE_* bits, all siblings work on thread 0 paca */
+ unsigned long idle_lock; /* A value of 1 means acquired */
unsigned long idle_state;
union {
/* P7/P8 specific fields */
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
index 841cb7f31f4f..97dbb7bc2b00 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
@@ -246,9 +246,9 @@ static inline void atomic_lock_thread_idle(void)
{
int cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
int first = cpu_first_thread_sibling(cpu);
- unsigned long *state = &paca_ptrs[first]->idle_state;
+ unsigned long *lock = &paca_ptrs[first]->idle_lock;
- while (unlikely(test_and_set_bit_lock(NR_PNV_CORE_IDLE_LOCK_BIT, state)))
+ while (unlikely(test_and_set_bit_lock(NR_PNV_CORE_IDLE_LOCK_BIT, lock)))
barrier();
}
@@ -258,29 +258,31 @@ static inline void atomic_unlock_and_stop_thread_idle(void)
int first = cpu_first_thread_sibling(cpu);
unsigned long thread = 1UL << cpu_thread_in_core(cpu);
unsigned long *state = &paca_ptrs[first]->idle_state;
+ unsigned long *lock = &paca_ptrs[first]->idle_lock;
u64 s = READ_ONCE(*state);
u64 new, tmp;
- BUG_ON(!(s & PNV_CORE_IDLE_LOCK_BIT));
+ BUG_ON(!(READ_ONCE(*lock) & PNV_CORE_IDLE_LOCK_BIT));
BUG_ON(s & thread);
again:
- new = (s | thread) & ~PNV_CORE_IDLE_LOCK_BIT;
+ new = s | thread;
tmp = cmpxchg(state, s, new);
if (unlikely(tmp != s)) {
s = tmp;
goto again;
}
+ clear_bit_unlock(NR_PNV_CORE_IDLE_LOCK_BIT, lock);
}
static inline void atomic_unlock_thread_idle(void)
{
int cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
int first = cpu_first_thread_sibling(cpu);
- unsigned long *state = &paca_ptrs[first]->idle_state;
+ unsigned long *lock = &paca_ptrs[first]->idle_lock;
- BUG_ON(!test_bit(NR_PNV_CORE_IDLE_LOCK_BIT, state));
- clear_bit_unlock(NR_PNV_CORE_IDLE_LOCK_BIT, state);
+ BUG_ON(!test_bit(NR_PNV_CORE_IDLE_LOCK_BIT, lock));
+ clear_bit_unlock(NR_PNV_CORE_IDLE_LOCK_BIT, lock);
}
/* P7 and P8 */
@@ -380,9 +382,9 @@ static unsigned long power7_idle_insn(unsigned long type)
sprs.uamor = mfspr(SPRN_UAMOR);
}
- local_paca->thread_idle_state = type;
+ WRITE_ONCE(local_paca->thread_idle_state, type);
srr1 = isa206_idle_insn_mayloss(type); /* go idle */
- local_paca->thread_idle_state = PNV_THREAD_RUNNING;
+ WRITE_ONCE(local_paca->thread_idle_state, PNV_THREAD_RUNNING);
WARN_ON_ONCE(!srr1);
WARN_ON_ONCE(mfmsr() & (MSR_IR|MSR_DR));
--
2.37.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-08 2:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-08 2:01 [PATCH 00/12] powerpc: KCSAN fix warnings and mark accesses Rohan McLure
2023-05-08 2:01 ` [PATCH 01/12] powerpc: qspinlock: Fix qnode->locked value interpretation Rohan McLure
2023-05-09 2:01 ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-05-09 4:26 ` Rohan McLure
2023-05-08 2:01 ` [PATCH 02/12] powerpc: qspinlock: Mark accesses to qnode lock checks Rohan McLure
2023-05-09 2:02 ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-05-08 2:01 ` [PATCH 03/12] powerpc: qspinlock: Enforce qnode writes prior to publishing to queue Rohan McLure
2023-05-09 2:04 ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-05-09 5:26 ` Rohan McLure
2023-05-09 6:45 ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-05-08 2:01 ` [PATCH 04/12] asm-generic/mmiowb: Mark accesses to fix KCSAN warnings Rohan McLure
2023-05-08 6:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-05-08 15:44 ` [PATCH 4/12] " Gautam Menghani
2023-05-09 2:16 ` [PATCH 04/12] " Nicholas Piggin
2023-05-08 2:01 ` [PATCH 05/12] powerpc: Mark [h]ssr_valid accesses in check_return_regs_valid Rohan McLure
2023-05-09 2:17 ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-05-08 2:01 ` [PATCH 06/12] powerpc: Mark accesses to power_save callback in arch_cpu_idle Rohan McLure
2023-05-09 2:21 ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-05-08 2:01 ` Rohan McLure [this message]
2023-05-09 2:26 ` [PATCH 07/12] powerpc: powernv: Fix KCSAN datarace warnings on idle_state contention Nicholas Piggin
2023-05-10 2:00 ` Rohan McLure
2023-05-08 2:01 ` [PATCH 08/12] powerpc: Annotate accesses to ipi message flags Rohan McLure
2023-05-09 2:28 ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-05-08 2:01 ` [PATCH 09/12] powerpc: Mark writes registering ipi to host cpu through kvm Rohan McLure
2023-05-09 2:30 ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-05-08 2:01 ` [PATCH 10/12] powerpc: powernv: Annotate data races in opal events Rohan McLure
2023-05-09 2:31 ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-05-08 2:01 ` [PATCH 11/12] powerpc: powernv: Annotate asynchronous access to opal tokens Rohan McLure
2023-05-08 2:01 ` [PATCH 12/12] powerpc: Mark asynchronous accesses to irq_data Rohan McLure
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230508020120.218494-8-rmclure@linux.ibm.com \
--to=rmclure@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=rmclure@ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).