linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
	Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com>,
	Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@gmail.com>,
	kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v8 1/8] KVM: Assert that a page's refcount is elevated when marking accessed/dirty
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 17:04:01 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230824080408.2933205-2-stevensd@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230824080408.2933205-1-stevensd@google.com>

From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>

Assert that a page's refcount is elevated, i.e. that _something_ holds a
reference to the page, when KVM marks a page as accessed and/or dirty.
KVM typically doesn't hold a reference to pages that are mapped into the
guest, e.g. to allow page migration, compaction, swap, etc., and instead
relies on mmu_notifiers to react to changes in the primary MMU.

Incorrect handling of mmu_notifier events (or similar mechanisms) can
result in KVM keeping a mapping beyond the lifetime of the backing page,
i.e. can (and often does) result in use-after-free.  Yelling if KVM marks
a freed page as accessed/dirty doesn't prevent badness as KVM usually
only does A/D updates when unmapping memory from the guest, i.e. the
assertion fires well after an underlying bug has occurred, but yelling
does help detect, triage, and debug use-after-free bugs.

Note, the assertion must use page_count(), NOT page_ref_count()!  For
hugepages, the returned struct page may be a tailpage and thus not have
its own refcount.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
 virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 13 +++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)

diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index 5bbb5612b207..1e4586aaa6cb 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -2888,6 +2888,19 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_vcpu_unmap);
 
 static bool kvm_is_ad_tracked_page(struct page *page)
 {
+	/*
+	 * Assert that KVM isn't attempting to mark a freed page as Accessed or
+	 * Dirty, i.e. that KVM's MMU doesn't have a use-after-free bug.  KVM
+	 * (typically) doesn't pin pages that are mapped in KVM's MMU, and
+	 * instead relies on mmu_notifiers to know when a mapping needs to be
+	 * zapped/invalidated.  Unmapping from KVM's MMU must happen _before_
+	 * KVM returns from its mmu_notifier, i.e. the page should have an
+	 * elevated refcount at this point even though KVM doesn't hold a
+	 * reference of its own.
+	 */
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!page_count(page)))
+		return false;
+
 	/*
 	 * Per page-flags.h, pages tagged PG_reserved "should in general not be
 	 * touched (e.g. set dirty) except by its owner".
-- 
2.42.0.rc1.204.g551eb34607-goog


  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-24  8:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-24  8:04 [PATCH v8 0/8] KVM: allow mapping non-refcounted pages David Stevens
2023-08-24  8:04 ` David Stevens [this message]
2023-08-24  8:04 ` [PATCH v8 2/8] KVM: mmu: Introduce __kvm_follow_pfn function David Stevens
2023-08-24  8:04 ` [PATCH v8 3/8] KVM: mmu: Make __kvm_follow_pfn not imply FOLL_GET David Stevens
2023-08-24  8:04 ` [PATCH v8 4/8] KVM: x86/mmu: Migrate to __kvm_follow_pfn David Stevens
2023-08-24  8:04 ` [PATCH v8 5/8] KVM: x86/mmu: Don't pass FOLL_GET " David Stevens
2023-08-24  9:13   ` Mika Penttilä
2023-08-24  8:04 ` [PATCH v8 6/8] KVM: arm64: Migrate " David Stevens
2023-08-24  8:04 ` [PATCH v8 7/8] KVM: PPC: " David Stevens
2023-08-24  8:04 ` [PATCH v8 8/8] KVM: mmu: remove __gfn_to_pfn_memslot David Stevens

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230824080408.2933205-2-stevensd@google.com \
    --to=stevensd@chromium.org \
    --cc=isaku.yamahata@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).