From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
ndesaulniers@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] powerpc/smp: Dynamically build powerpc topology
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2023 17:56:14 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230830122614.73067-1-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
Currently there are four powerpc specific sched topologies. These are
all statically defined. However not all these topologies are used by
all powerpc systems.
To avoid unnecessary degenerations by the scheduler , masks and flags
are compared. However if the sched topologies are build dynamically then
the code is simpler and there are greater chances of avoiding
degenerations.
Even x86 builds its sched topologies dynamically and new changes are
very similar to the way x86 is building its topologies.
System Configuration
type=Shared mode=Uncapped smt=8 lcpu=128 mem=1063126592 kB cpus=96 ent=40.00
$ lscpu
Architecture: ppc64le
Byte Order: Little Endian
CPU(s): 1024
On-line CPU(s) list: 0-1023
Model name: POWER10 (architected), altivec supported
Model: 2.0 (pvr 0080 0200)
Thread(s) per core: 8
Core(s) per socket: 32
Socket(s): 4
Hypervisor vendor: pHyp
Virtualization type: para
L1d cache: 8 MiB (256 instances)
L1i cache: 12 MiB (256 instances)
NUMA node(s): 4
From dmesg of v6.5
[ 0.174444] smp: Bringing up secondary CPUs ...
[ 3.918535] smp: Brought up 4 nodes, 1024 CPUs
[ 38.001402] sysrq: Changing Loglevel
[ 38.001446] sysrq: Loglevel set to 9
From dmesg of v6.5 + patch
[ 0.174462] smp: Bringing up secondary CPUs ...
[ 3.421462] smp: Brought up 4 nodes, 1024 CPUs
[ 35.417917] sysrq: Changing Loglevel
[ 35.417959] sysrq: Loglevel set to 9
5 runs of ppc64_cpu --smt=1 (time measured: lesser is better)
Kernel N Min Max Median Avg Stddev %Change
v6.5 5 518.08 574.27 528.61 535.388 22.341542
+patch 5 481.73 495.47 484.21 486.402 5.7997 -9.14963
5 runs of ppc64_cpu --smt=8 (time measured: lesser is better)
Kernel N Min Max Median Avg Stddev %Change
v6.5 5 1094.12 1117.1 1108.97 1106.3 8.606361
+patch 5 1067.5 1090.03 1073.89 1076.574 9.4189347 -2.68697
Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c | 78 ++++++++++++++-------------------------
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
index 48b8161179a8..c16443a04c26 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
@@ -92,15 +92,6 @@ EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(cpu_l2_cache_map);
EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(cpu_core_map);
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(has_big_cores);
-enum {
-#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
- smt_idx,
-#endif
- cache_idx,
- mc_idx,
- die_idx,
-};
-
#define MAX_THREAD_LIST_SIZE 8
#define THREAD_GROUP_SHARE_L1 1
#define THREAD_GROUP_SHARE_L2_L3 2
@@ -1048,16 +1039,6 @@ static const struct cpumask *cpu_mc_mask(int cpu)
return cpu_coregroup_mask(cpu);
}
-static struct sched_domain_topology_level powerpc_topology[] = {
-#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
- { cpu_smt_mask, powerpc_smt_flags, SD_INIT_NAME(SMT) },
-#endif
- { shared_cache_mask, powerpc_shared_cache_flags, SD_INIT_NAME(CACHE) },
- { cpu_mc_mask, powerpc_shared_proc_flags, SD_INIT_NAME(MC) },
- { cpu_cpu_mask, powerpc_shared_proc_flags, SD_INIT_NAME(DIE) },
- { NULL, },
-};
-
static int __init init_big_cores(void)
{
int cpu;
@@ -1676,9 +1657,11 @@ void start_secondary(void *unused)
BUG();
}
-static void __init fixup_topology(void)
+static struct sched_domain_topology_level powerpc_topology[6];
+
+static void __init build_sched_topology(void)
{
- int i;
+ int i = 0;
if (is_shared_processor()) {
asym_pack_flag = SD_ASYM_PACKING;
@@ -1690,36 +1673,33 @@ static void __init fixup_topology(void)
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
if (has_big_cores) {
pr_info("Big cores detected but using small core scheduling\n");
- powerpc_topology[smt_idx].mask = smallcore_smt_mask;
+ powerpc_topology[i++] = (struct sched_domain_topology_level){
+ smallcore_smt_mask, powerpc_smt_flags, SD_INIT_NAME(SMT)
+ };
+ } else {
+ powerpc_topology[i++] = (struct sched_domain_topology_level){
+ cpu_smt_mask, powerpc_smt_flags, SD_INIT_NAME(SMT)
+ };
}
#endif
+ if (shared_caches) {
+ powerpc_topology[i++] = (struct sched_domain_topology_level){
+ shared_cache_mask, powerpc_shared_cache_flags, SD_INIT_NAME(CACHE)
+ };
+ }
+ if (has_coregroup_support()) {
+ powerpc_topology[i++] = (struct sched_domain_topology_level){
+ cpu_mc_mask, powerpc_shared_proc_flags, SD_INIT_NAME(MC)
+ };
+ }
+ powerpc_topology[i++] = (struct sched_domain_topology_level){
+ cpu_cpu_mask, powerpc_shared_proc_flags, SD_INIT_NAME(DIE)
+ };
- if (!has_coregroup_support())
- powerpc_topology[mc_idx].mask = powerpc_topology[cache_idx].mask;
-
- /*
- * Try to consolidate topology levels here instead of
- * allowing scheduler to degenerate.
- * - Dont consolidate if masks are different.
- * - Dont consolidate if sd_flags exists and are different.
- */
- for (i = 1; i <= die_idx; i++) {
- if (powerpc_topology[i].mask != powerpc_topology[i - 1].mask)
- continue;
-
- if (powerpc_topology[i].sd_flags && powerpc_topology[i - 1].sd_flags &&
- powerpc_topology[i].sd_flags != powerpc_topology[i - 1].sd_flags)
- continue;
-
- if (!powerpc_topology[i - 1].sd_flags)
- powerpc_topology[i - 1].sd_flags = powerpc_topology[i].sd_flags;
+ /* There must be one trailing NULL entry left. */
+ BUG_ON(i >= ARRAY_SIZE(powerpc_topology) - 1);
- powerpc_topology[i].mask = powerpc_topology[i + 1].mask;
- powerpc_topology[i].sd_flags = powerpc_topology[i + 1].sd_flags;
-#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG
- powerpc_topology[i].name = powerpc_topology[i + 1].name;
-#endif
- }
+ set_sched_topology(powerpc_topology);
}
void __init smp_cpus_done(unsigned int max_cpus)
@@ -1734,9 +1714,7 @@ void __init smp_cpus_done(unsigned int max_cpus)
smp_ops->bringup_done();
dump_numa_cpu_topology();
-
- fixup_topology();
- set_sched_topology(powerpc_topology);
+ build_sched_topology();
}
#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
--
2.41.0
next reply other threads:[~2023-08-30 12:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-30 12:26 Srikar Dronamraju [this message]
2023-09-04 22:10 ` [PATCH] powerpc/smp: Dynamically build powerpc topology Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-05 5:37 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2023-10-20 12:10 ` Michael Ellerman
2023-10-20 13:21 ` Srikar Dronamraju
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230830122614.73067-1-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=nathanl@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).