From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87EEFEE0212 for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 02:03:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20230601 header.b=TakjM6Fg; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4RmLFr0FTYz3dT4 for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 12:03:28 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20230601 header.b=TakjM6Fg; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=flex--seanjc.bounces.google.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::b49; helo=mail-yb1-xb49.google.com; envelope-from=3kggczqykddefrnawptbbtyr.pbzyvahkccp-qriyvfgf.bmynof.bet@flex--seanjc.bounces.google.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from mail-yb1-xb49.google.com (mail-yb1-xb49.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b49]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4RmL563Sgrz3bXm for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 11:55:54 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-yb1-xb49.google.com with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-d8185415dfbso535232276.3 for ; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 18:55:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1694656552; x=1695261352; darn=lists.ozlabs.org; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:reply-to:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=c0gbqnW9KUovCg+coU7ldlYhYVFXBRbmaH2jYlXJSe8=; b=TakjM6Fg5aiBsySvVH6EcJUgX7bxDMfw5e3b+UhGq3zdAHAIxTgXhhLSV0Nege8clC CflNVFUDZ3fWMpPCMuou8Pp2wn4Zv1U52L+kx64rZ4WxU93qWxmY7YRE/QRYj/2nz+Zi eHWzBV1IQQVgyDTqKisuCOXKFTXdZvWlkwxnIdGBMcEOoDsQdsmGGLA1MgXjofYiI9/e gO8wRImNsdhJdJDJZT/A3rxE5y4oTOb+NjHNhO3RF8f8Xu8k6ZImPpNNmwFpsRSsaFpH feWtaqvou7HFAEXj65Zhz4APzO192CjHlxFS/8tWShWz7LTZshC66H4BdvhYDzJQC/40 uqng== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1694656552; x=1695261352; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:reply-to:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=c0gbqnW9KUovCg+coU7ldlYhYVFXBRbmaH2jYlXJSe8=; b=tXHXs//vsCDGPQtHdMOYR6b6bTMYgv8QHt6YlGKBuyPdMYRZXSeARUEmgBSJMBAFdS aXiCXpFdwIq1wM+4fXOqZAs/gpKY/lgqdRBD2eBWXT2tcyIBETbBISvSl4jje/nkR4HP 7BznbmZD9Ue0Y5L/TOcupoWtombVa9/IxToHjH0jEZoXt+GaSc8VTPaV8JIs+BrQ3ctE 8g5m9T8XDHRHf/QPeQ9qUxwTnVY5SYHxOfIo9PmJSp6C5jrrpef4ooJmKyMDI8WDGCYm Onbp36Mgas0vEvNQh3ffzhv9NxDj3EMLsfwigWwbIy1j0M5Fyd3yJMG8nvvA3vM7m4+y zKvg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw3aakMPmz5sHxrYjS6fKJM6Am9h13LtKr77EUrAA4FhuVG0/X/ QHX27//HrNndMyb87536FUEHyRqMozc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG9pkaa+NfBfBN3tv0PMD61sScfAedWpdRl9BNgXYxxGW/3XiB249I/ScBV6f/2zKuHHJhj18tIK2Y= X-Received: from zagreus.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:7f:e700:c0a8:5c37]) (user=seanjc job=sendgmr) by 2002:a25:83d0:0:b0:d78:3c2e:b186 with SMTP id v16-20020a2583d0000000b00d783c2eb186mr79839ybm.5.1694656552108; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 18:55:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 18:55:06 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20230914015531.1419405-1-seanjc@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20230914015531.1419405-1-seanjc@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.42.0.283.g2d96d420d3-goog Message-ID: <20230914015531.1419405-9-seanjc@google.com> Subject: [RFC PATCH v12 08/33] KVM: Add a dedicated mmu_notifier flag for reclaiming freed memory From: Sean Christopherson To: Paolo Bonzini , Marc Zyngier , Oliver Upton , Huacai Chen , Michael Ellerman , Anup Patel , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Sean Christopherson , "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" , Andrew Morton , Paul Moore , James Morris , "Serge E. Hallyn" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Sean Christopherson Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, David Hildenbrand , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Chao Peng , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Isaku Yamahata , linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, Wang , Fuad Tabba , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Maciej Szmigiero , Michael Roth , Ackerley Tng , kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, Vlastimil Babka , Isaku Yamahata , Quentin Perret , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Jarkko Sakkinen , Yu Zhang , "Kirill A . Shutemov" , kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Liam Merwick , Vishal Annapurve , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Xu Yilun , Ani sh Moorthy Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Handle AMD SEV's kvm_arch_guest_memory_reclaimed() hook by having __kvm_handle_hva_range() return whether or not an overlapping memslot was found, i.e. mmu_lock was acquired. Using the .on_unlock() hook works, but kvm_arch_guest_memory_reclaimed() needs to run after dropping mmu_lock, which makes .on_lock() and .on_unlock() asymmetrical. Use a small struct to return the tuple of the notifier-specific return, plus whether or not overlap was found. Because the iteration helpers are __always_inlined, practically speaking, the struct will never actually be returned from a function call (not to mention the size of the struct will be two bytes in practice). Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson --- virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c index 7c0e38752526..76d01de7838f 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c @@ -561,6 +561,19 @@ struct kvm_mmu_notifier_range { bool may_block; }; +/* + * The inner-most helper returns a tuple containing the return value from the + * arch- and action-specific handler, plus a flag indicating whether or not at + * least one memslot was found, i.e. if the handler found guest memory. + * + * Note, most notifiers are averse to booleans, so even though KVM tracks the + * return from arch code as a bool, outer helpers will cast it to an int. :-( + */ +typedef struct kvm_mmu_notifier_return { + bool ret; + bool found_memslot; +} kvm_mn_ret_t; + /* * Use a dedicated stub instead of NULL to indicate that there is no callback * function/handler. The compiler technically can't guarantee that a real @@ -582,22 +595,25 @@ static const union kvm_mmu_notifier_arg KVM_MMU_NOTIFIER_NO_ARG; node; \ node = interval_tree_iter_next(node, start, last)) \ -static __always_inline int __kvm_handle_hva_range(struct kvm *kvm, - const struct kvm_mmu_notifier_range *range) +static __always_inline kvm_mn_ret_t __kvm_handle_hva_range(struct kvm *kvm, + const struct kvm_mmu_notifier_range *range) { - bool ret = false, locked = false; + struct kvm_mmu_notifier_return r = { + .ret = false, + .found_memslot = false, + }; struct kvm_gfn_range gfn_range; struct kvm_memory_slot *slot; struct kvm_memslots *slots; int i, idx; if (WARN_ON_ONCE(range->end <= range->start)) - return 0; + return r; /* A null handler is allowed if and only if on_lock() is provided. */ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_KVM_NULL_FN(range->on_lock) && IS_KVM_NULL_FN(range->handler))) - return 0; + return r; idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu); @@ -631,8 +647,8 @@ static __always_inline int __kvm_handle_hva_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_range.end = hva_to_gfn_memslot(hva_end + PAGE_SIZE - 1, slot); gfn_range.slot = slot; - if (!locked) { - locked = true; + if (!r.found_memslot) { + r.found_memslot = true; KVM_MMU_LOCK(kvm); if (!IS_KVM_NULL_FN(range->on_lock)) range->on_lock(kvm); @@ -640,14 +656,14 @@ static __always_inline int __kvm_handle_hva_range(struct kvm *kvm, if (IS_KVM_NULL_FN(range->handler)) break; } - ret |= range->handler(kvm, &gfn_range); + r.ret |= range->handler(kvm, &gfn_range); } } - if (range->flush_on_ret && ret) + if (range->flush_on_ret && r.ret) kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm); - if (locked) { + if (r.found_memslot) { KVM_MMU_UNLOCK(kvm); if (!IS_KVM_NULL_FN(range->on_unlock)) range->on_unlock(kvm); @@ -655,8 +671,7 @@ static __always_inline int __kvm_handle_hva_range(struct kvm *kvm, srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx); - /* The notifiers are averse to booleans. :-( */ - return (int)ret; + return r; } static __always_inline int kvm_handle_hva_range(struct mmu_notifier *mn, @@ -677,7 +692,7 @@ static __always_inline int kvm_handle_hva_range(struct mmu_notifier *mn, .may_block = false, }; - return __kvm_handle_hva_range(kvm, &range); + return __kvm_handle_hva_range(kvm, &range).ret; } static __always_inline int kvm_handle_hva_range_no_flush(struct mmu_notifier *mn, @@ -696,7 +711,7 @@ static __always_inline int kvm_handle_hva_range_no_flush(struct mmu_notifier *mn .may_block = false, }; - return __kvm_handle_hva_range(kvm, &range); + return __kvm_handle_hva_range(kvm, &range).ret; } static bool kvm_change_spte_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range) @@ -796,7 +811,7 @@ static int kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *mn, .end = range->end, .handler = kvm_mmu_unmap_gfn_range, .on_lock = kvm_mmu_invalidate_begin, - .on_unlock = kvm_arch_guest_memory_reclaimed, + .on_unlock = (void *)kvm_null_fn, .flush_on_ret = true, .may_block = mmu_notifier_range_blockable(range), }; @@ -828,7 +843,13 @@ static int kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *mn, gfn_to_pfn_cache_invalidate_start(kvm, range->start, range->end, hva_range.may_block); - __kvm_handle_hva_range(kvm, &hva_range); + /* + * If one or more memslots were found and thus zapped, notify arch code + * that guest memory has been reclaimed. This needs to be done *after* + * dropping mmu_lock, as x86's reclaim path is slooooow. + */ + if (__kvm_handle_hva_range(kvm, &hva_range).found_memslot) + kvm_arch_guest_memory_reclaimed(kvm); return 0; } -- 2.42.0.283.g2d96d420d3-goog