From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E6AEEE3F01 for ; Fri, 15 Sep 2023 05:26:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=LG57fO6j; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Rn2jD5194z3cD5 for ; Fri, 15 Sep 2023 15:26:08 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=LG57fO6j; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Rn2gM6K8Cz3bqW for ; Fri, 15 Sep 2023 15:24:31 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0353725.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 38F5MRBw023085; Fri, 15 Sep 2023 05:24:26 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=cfBPA848T/IY3A/noQsnkhS8n+0MNu1HCdw0fmFqSbA=; b=LG57fO6jlcN7GT+rMiwvfvEJbmrV2LIKBGsST41g6qf+42abmoZr/9gbJax/0DGkQxYs PvRzpQP1bjW+tpv0q8TGhR8UIiNoBwLVjBJXYc2DQ7hlDsB7MKk1UXi/0MEiAmY+SoQ+ /alAxVoYTx4R3n2pLmwRh8Z6+0ACZR+Z6JOAxLL2BqVG2cWR/oaSSkqAfeAQzSc3Sn4J PCPLm3xSspslbJxe0MIpCda8131RmEpOUY/JbKvK+dvJPJhea8qVUi50H4DzSY4Vrf/H wqBg8QxkOTWzR3/mlidadT61nuh7f2eXGESZ8sWpuGymy0jYPLlbHkoFLhlaIuFZNVaV 3g== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3t4h2m01ap-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 15 Sep 2023 05:24:25 +0000 Received: from m0353725.ppops.net (m0353725.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 38F5O0gl027554; Fri, 15 Sep 2023 05:24:25 GMT Received: from ppma12.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (dc.9e.1632.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [50.22.158.220]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3t4h2m01ac-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 15 Sep 2023 05:24:25 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma12.dal12v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma12.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 38F4UjF8024080; Fri, 15 Sep 2023 05:24:24 GMT Received: from smtprelay03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.224]) by ppma12.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3t131trw73-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 15 Sep 2023 05:24:24 +0000 Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.105]) by smtprelay03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 38F5OLDd18416340 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 15 Sep 2023 05:24:21 GMT Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97F0420049; Fri, 15 Sep 2023 05:24:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4425520040; Fri, 15 Sep 2023 05:24:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [9.43.67.213]) by smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Sep 2023 05:24:19 +0000 (GMT) From: Athira Rajeev To: acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, adrian.hunter@intel.com, irogers@google.com, namhyung@kernel.org Subject: [PATCH V3 2/2] tools/perf/tests: Fix object code reading to skip address that falls out of text section Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 10:54:12 +0530 Message-Id: <20230915052412.2643-2-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.35.1 In-Reply-To: <20230915052412.2643-1-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20230915052412.2643-1-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: d4QBI_vr_J4hKVNmhc9vmy6-PYjmlhJq X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: LeZcuz2H8-rGGstyn9bGuLS0oErQ3mHp X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.267,Aquarius:18.0.980,Hydra:6.0.601,FMLib:17.11.176.26 definitions=2023-09-15_04,2023-09-14_01,2023-05-22_02 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 clxscore=1015 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2308100000 definitions=main-2309150044 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Disha Goel , kjain@linux.ibm.com, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, maddy@linux.ibm.com, disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" The testcase "Object code reading" fails in somecases for "fs_something" sub test as below: Reading object code for memory address: 0xc008000007f0142c File is: /lib/modules/6.5.0-rc3+/kernel/fs/xfs/xfs.ko On file address is: 0x1114cc Objdump command is: objdump -z -d --start-address=0x11142c --stop-address=0x1114ac /lib/modules/6.5.0-rc3+/kernel/fs/xfs/xfs.ko objdump read too few bytes: 128 test child finished with -1 This can alo be reproduced when running perf record with workload that exercises fs_something() code. In the test setup, this is exercising xfs code since root is xfs. # perf record ./a.out # perf report -v |grep "xfs.ko" 0.76% a.out /lib/modules/6.5.0-rc3+/kernel/fs/xfs/xfs.ko 0xc008000007de5efc B [k] xlog_cil_commit 0.74% a.out /lib/modules/6.5.0-rc3+/kernel/fs/xfs/xfs.ko 0xc008000007d5ae18 B [k] xfs_btree_key_offset 0.74% a.out /lib/modules/6.5.0-rc3+/kernel/fs/xfs/xfs.ko 0xc008000007e11fd4 B [k] 0x0000000000112074 Here addr "0xc008000007e11fd4" is not resolved. since this is a kernel module, its offset is from the DSO. Xfs module is loaded at 0xc008000007d00000 # cat /proc/modules | grep xfs xfs 2228224 3 - Live 0xc008000007d00000 And size is 0x220000. So its loaded between  0xc008000007d00000 and 0xc008000007f20000. From objdump, text section is: text 0010f7bc 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 000000a0 2**4 Hence perf captured ip maps to 0x112074 which is: ( ip - start of module ) + a0 This offset 0x112074 falls out .text section which is up to 0x10f7bc In this case for module, the address 0xc008000007e11fd4 is pointing to stub instructions. This address range represents the module stubs which is allocated on module load and hence is not part of DSO offset. To address this issue in "object code reading", skip the sample if address falls out of text section and is within the module end. Use the "text_end" member of "struct dso" to do this check. To address this issue in "perf report", exploring an option of having stubs range as part of the /proc/kallsyms, so that perf report can resolve addresses in stubs range However this patch uses text_end to skip the stub range for Object code reading testcase. Reported-by: Disha Goel Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev Tested-by: Disha Goel Reviewed-by: Adrian Hunter --- Changelog: v2 -> v3: Used strtailcmp in comparison for module check and added Reviewed-by from Adrian, Tested-by from Disha. v1 -> v2: Updated comment to add description on which arch has stub and reason for skipping as suggested by Adrian tools/perf/tests/code-reading.c | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/code-reading.c b/tools/perf/tests/code-reading.c index ed3815163d1b..45334d26058e 100644 --- a/tools/perf/tests/code-reading.c +++ b/tools/perf/tests/code-reading.c @@ -269,6 +269,16 @@ static int read_object_code(u64 addr, size_t len, u8 cpumode, if (addr + len > map__end(al.map)) len = map__end(al.map) - addr; + /* + * Some architectures (ex: powerpc) have stubs (trampolines) in kernel + * modules to manage long jumps. Check if the ip offset falls in stubs + * sections for kernel modules. And skip module address after text end + */ + if (!strtailcmp(dso->long_name, ".ko") && al.addr > dso->text_end) { + pr_debug("skipping the module address %#"PRIx64" after text end\n", al.addr); + goto out; + } + /* Read the object code using perf */ ret_len = dso__data_read_offset(dso, maps__machine(thread__maps(thread)), al.addr, buf1, len); -- 2.31.1