From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB47EC46CA1 for ; Mon, 18 Sep 2023 08:36:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=gm1 header.b=odhYABxa; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Rpynq1Dgvz3c5n for ; Mon, 18 Sep 2023 18:36:47 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=gm1 header.b=odhYABxa; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com (client-ip=217.70.183.200; helo=relay7-d.mail.gandi.net; envelope-from=herve.codina@bootlin.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from relay7-d.mail.gandi.net (relay7-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Rpymn057lz2xl6 for ; Mon, 18 Sep 2023 18:35:50 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 447DF20004; Mon, 18 Sep 2023 08:35:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1695026146; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=PIpUMSw/2404AMS4Yo5lxieSUrVtp4AW1CJFXc7BrJs=; b=odhYABxaRFjWsbpVj+xwjaWnzsTPysdiTFLNxA143gxz1iv0ARdos2si28g0FvPNRJfsf0 igTTeSj9hOhAqT6WSZud7AhrNda9CqPeN5PToxzt17WLYZqrS7tcAk8lFN57RUn3qpNRhE axfLCMiY3kNHK6sZsERj4OZGA3JB2nhfkCfqOQC+MpQw43+dglF1J/3dgc4hzlfWktvcWT YpEl/Xnb2C0XOfhwkDTsXYka/KFGolot4npq0MbCNCidMtsN0Z0yYsupn3/3Xbc+g6cEOQ xEMnYzwq1m+uwdoUDuMZ5gO7ubkRx5I7/tiJ126KShCLAKMDSrnEnITmLJj8Rw== Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 10:35:40 +0200 From: Herve Codina To: Linus Walleij Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 28/31] pinctrl: Add support for the Lantic PEF2256 pinmux Message-ID: <20230918103540.5902af4c@bootlin.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20230912081527.208499-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com> <20230912101505.225899-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.38; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-GND-Sasl: herve.codina@bootlin.com X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Andrew Lunn , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Thomas Petazzoni , Xiubo Li , Jaroslav Kysela , Eric Dumazet , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Fabio Estevam , Qiang Zhao , Shengjiu Wang , Lee Jones , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Conor Dooley , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nicolin Chen , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown , Christophe JAILLET , Takashi Iwai , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Randy Dunlap , Liam Girdwood , Li Yang , Rob Herring , Simon Horman , linuxppc-de v@lists.ozlabs.org, "David S. Miller" Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 13:04:56 +0200 Linus Walleij wrote: > Hi Herve, > > thanks for your patch! > > On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 12:15 PM Herve Codina wrote: > > > The Lantiq PEF2256 is a framer and line interface component designed to > > fulfill all required interfacing between an analog E1/T1/J1 line and the > > digital PCM system highway/H.100 bus. > > > > This kind of component can be found in old telecommunication system. > > It was used to digital transmission of many simultaneous telephone calls > > by time-division multiplexing. Also using HDLC protocol, WAN networks > > can be reached through the framer. > > > > This pinmux support handles the pin muxing part (pins RP(A..D) and pins > > XP(A..D)) of the PEF2256. > > > > Signed-off-by: Herve Codina > > Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy > > Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy > > Nice to see this as a proper pin control driver! > > > drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-pef2256-regs.h | 65 ++++++ > > drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-pef2256.c | 308 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > Do you really need a separate header just for some registers? > But it's a matter of taste so I'm not gonna complain if you want > it this way. Will be move to the .c file in the next iteration. > > > +config PINCTRL_PEF2256 > > + tristate "Lantiq PEF2256 (FALC56) pin controller driver" > > + depends on OF && FRAMER_PEF2256 > > + select PINMUX > > select PINCONF Will be added in the next iteration. > > > + select GENERIC_PINCONF > > This brings it in implicitly but I prefer that you just select it. > > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ > > +/* > > I think SPDX mandates that you start the tag with C99 comments Already replied by Mark, C style comment is correct -> No change. > > // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only > > > + /* We map 1 group <-> 1 pin */ > > Also known as "the qualcomm trick", but hey: it's fine. > > > +static int pef2256_register_pinctrl(struct pef2256_pinctrl *pef2256) > > +{ > > + struct pinctrl_dev *pctrl; > > + > > + pef2256->pctrl_desc.name = dev_name(pef2256->dev); > > + pef2256->pctrl_desc.owner = THIS_MODULE; > > + pef2256->pctrl_desc.pctlops = &pef2256_pctlops; > > + pef2256->pctrl_desc.pmxops = &pef2256_pmxops; > > + if (pef2256->version == PEF2256_VERSION_1_2) { > > + pef2256->pctrl_desc.pins = pef2256_v12_pins; > > + pef2256->pctrl_desc.npins = ARRAY_SIZE(pef2256_v12_pins); > > + pef2256->functions = pef2256_v12_functions; > > + pef2256->nfunctions = ARRAY_SIZE(pef2256_v12_functions); > > + } else { > > + pef2256->pctrl_desc.pins = pef2256_v2x_pins; > > + pef2256->pctrl_desc.npins = ARRAY_SIZE(pef2256_v2x_pins); > > + pef2256->functions = pef2256_v2x_functions; > > + pef2256->nfunctions = ARRAY_SIZE(pef2256_v2x_functions); > > + } > > + > > + pctrl = devm_pinctrl_register(pef2256->dev, &pef2256->pctrl_desc, pef2256); > > + if (IS_ERR(pctrl)) { > > + dev_err(pef2256->dev, "pinctrl driver registration failed\n"); > > + return PTR_ERR(pctrl); > > + } > > + > > + return 0; > > You could use > return dev_err_probe(...); Indeed, I will change. > > > + pef2256_reset_pinmux(pef2256_pinctrl); > > + ret = pef2256_register_pinctrl(pef2256_pinctrl); > > + if (ret) > > + return ret; > > Or you could use it down here. > > With or without these changes (because they are nitpicks) > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij > > Yours, > Linus Walleij Thanks for your comment. Best regards, Hervé