From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E8BFCD8CAC for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 17:14:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=korg header.b=L0nDeQU/; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4S4jFB6X23z3vfB for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2023 04:14:38 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=korg header.b=L0nDeQU/; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linuxfoundation.org (client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::1; helo=ams.source.kernel.org; envelope-from=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4S4jDD5Ccnz2yDS for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2023 04:13:48 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 582BCB81D49; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 17:13:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 22039C433C7; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 17:13:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1696958023; bh=/47AotOk6Pmbk+piTAfqSXBF2jYz0fjzzVpGbHxAJKE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=L0nDeQU/sSY09KfGVmYDlOkzQbdyG8DJs92I9N4NJXCSqYhz5ZjBtgkpd4c/g+tiL 9bZNypuhxGAhRS5Bq3JDRvP4O0IcBUyiujh9I3wK7kc4oGGBIPGLg9HMuv49orZIw3 ynXdhk71KzggKuGWHTItgMvJN+V8E584MvplIJ70= Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 19:13:40 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Anup Patel Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] RISC-V: KVM: Change the SBI specification version to v2.0 Message-ID: <2023101013-overfeed-online-7f69@gregkh> References: <20231010170503.657189-1-apatel@ventanamicro.com> <20231010170503.657189-3-apatel@ventanamicro.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231010170503.657189-3-apatel@ventanamicro.com> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Atish Patra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Conor Dooley , Palmer Dabbelt , kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Paul Walmsley , Paolo Bonzini , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Jiri Slaby , Andrew Jones Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 10:34:59PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote: > We will be implementing SBI DBCN extension for KVM RISC-V so let > us change the KVM RISC-V SBI specification version to v2.0. > > Signed-off-by: Anup Patel > --- > arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h > index cdcf0ff07be7..8d6d4dce8a5e 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h > @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ > > #define KVM_SBI_IMPID 3 > > -#define KVM_SBI_VERSION_MAJOR 1 > +#define KVM_SBI_VERSION_MAJOR 2 What does this number mean? Who checks it? Why do you have to keep incrementing it? thanks, greg k-h