From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
Cc: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] RISC-V: KVM: Change the SBI specification version to v2.0
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 17:26:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2023101148-anatomy-mantis-a0f5@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK9=C2XYQ0U9CbuCg6cTf79sSsy+0BxF5mBE0R+E3s9iZFzEWw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 04:32:22PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 12:57 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 11:49:14AM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 10:43 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > > <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 10:34:59PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> > > > > We will be implementing SBI DBCN extension for KVM RISC-V so let
> > > > > us change the KVM RISC-V SBI specification version to v2.0.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h | 2 +-
> > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h
> > > > > index cdcf0ff07be7..8d6d4dce8a5e 100644
> > > > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h
> > > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h
> > > > > @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
> > > > >
> > > > > #define KVM_SBI_IMPID 3
> > > > >
> > > > > -#define KVM_SBI_VERSION_MAJOR 1
> > > > > +#define KVM_SBI_VERSION_MAJOR 2
> > > >
> > > > What does this number mean? Who checks it? Why do you have to keep
> > > > incrementing it?
> > >
> > > This number is the SBI specification version implemented by KVM RISC-V
> > > for the Guest kernel.
> > >
> > > The original sbi_console_putchar() and sbi_console_getchar() are legacy
> > > functions (aka SBI v0.1) which were introduced a few years back along
> > > with the Linux RISC-V port.
> > >
> > > The latest SBI v2.0 specification (which is now frozen) introduces a new
> > > SBI debug console extension which replaces legacy sbi_console_putchar()
> > > and sbi_console_getchar() functions with better alternatives.
> > > (Refer, https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-sbi-doc/releases/download/commit-fe4562532a9cc57e5743b6466946c5e5c98c73ca/riscv-sbi.pdf)
> > >
> > > This series adds SBI debug console implementation in KVM RISC-V
> > > so the SBI specification version advertised by KVM RISC-V must also be
> > > upgraded to v2.0.
> > >
> > > Regarding who checks its, the SBI client drivers in the Linux kernel
> > > will check SBI specification version implemented by higher privilege
> > > mode (M-mode firmware or HS-mode hypervisor) before probing
> > > the SBI extension. For example, the HVC SBI driver (PATCH5)
> > > will ensure SBI spec version to be at least v2.0 before probing
> > > SBI debug console extension.
> >
> > Is this api backwards compatible, or did you just break existing
> > userspace that only expects version 1.0?
>
> The legacy sbi_console_putchar() and sbi_console_getchar()
> functions have not changed so it does not break existing
> user-space.
>
> The new SBI DBCN functions to be implemented by KVM
> user space are:
> sbi_debug_console_write()
> sbi_debug_console_read()
> sbi_debug_console_write_byte()
And where exactly is that code for us to review that this is tested?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-11 15:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-10 17:04 [PATCH 0/6] RISC-V SBI debug console extension support Anup Patel
2023-10-10 17:04 ` [PATCH 1/6] RISC-V: Add defines for SBI debug console extension Anup Patel
2023-10-10 17:04 ` [PATCH 2/6] RISC-V: KVM: Change the SBI specification version to v2.0 Anup Patel
2023-10-10 17:13 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-10-11 6:19 ` Anup Patel
2023-10-11 7:27 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-10-11 11:02 ` Anup Patel
2023-10-11 15:26 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2023-10-11 15:38 ` Anup Patel
2023-10-10 17:05 ` [PATCH 3/6] RISC-V: KVM: Forward SBI DBCN extension to user-space Anup Patel
2023-10-10 17:15 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-10-11 6:32 ` Anup Patel
2023-10-11 7:25 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-10-11 10:54 ` Anup Patel
2023-10-10 17:05 ` [PATCH 4/6] tty/serial: Add RISC-V SBI debug console based earlycon Anup Patel
2023-10-10 17:16 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-10-11 5:52 ` Anup Patel
2023-10-10 17:05 ` [PATCH 5/6] tty: Add SBI debug console support to HVC SBI driver Anup Patel
2023-10-10 17:12 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-10-11 5:51 ` Anup Patel
2023-10-10 17:05 ` [PATCH 6/6] RISC-V: Enable SBI based earlycon support Anup Patel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2023101148-anatomy-mantis-a0f5@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=apatel@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=atishp@atishpatra.org \
--cc=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).