From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"ndesaulniers@google.com" <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Rohan McLure <rmclure@linux.ibm.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] powerpc/smp: Enable Asym packing for cores on shared processor
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 11:12:49 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231115054249.GU2194132@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y1ezzivn.fsf@linux.ibm.com>
* Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> [2023-11-15 10:57:08]:
> Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
>
> > If there are shared processor LPARs, underlying Hypervisor can have more
> > virtual cores to handle than actual physical cores.
> >
> > Starting with Power 9, a big core (aka SMT8 core) has 2 nearly
> > independent thread groups. On a shared processors LPARs, it helps to
> > pack threads to lesser number of cores so that the overall system
> > performance and utilization improves. PowerVM schedules at a big core
> > level. Hence packing to fewer cores helps.
> >
> > For example: Lets says there are two 8-core Shared LPARs that are
> > actually sharing a 8 Core shared physical pool, each running 8 threads
> > each. Then Consolidating 8 threads to 4 cores on each LPAR would help
> > them to perform better. This is because each of the LPAR will get
> > 100% time to run applications and there will no switching required by
> > the Hypervisor.
> >
>
> Will this patch consolidate things to first 8 threads or just the one
> Big core? /me continues to look at other patches and wonder whether 4/5
> should come before this?
It will consolidate 1 thread per small core aka SMT domain or 2 threads per
Big core. If the load is such that there are more unbound threads than SMT
domains, asym packing will not kick-in.
4/5 would make sense only once we enable asym_packing above SMT domain.
>
>
> >
> > To achieve this, enable SD_ASYM_PACKING flag at CACHE, MC and DIE level
> > when the system is running in shared processor mode and has big cores.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
>
> -aneesh
--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-15 5:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-09 5:49 [PATCH v4 0/5] powerpc/smp: Topology and shared processor optimizations Srikar Dronamraju
2023-11-09 5:49 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] powerpc/smp: Enable Asym packing for cores on shared processor Srikar Dronamraju
2023-11-15 5:27 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-11-15 5:42 ` Srikar Dronamraju [this message]
2023-11-15 6:35 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-11-15 11:35 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2023-11-09 5:49 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] powerpc/smp: Disable MC domain for " Srikar Dronamraju
2023-11-09 5:49 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] powerpc/smp: Add __ro_after_init attribute Srikar Dronamraju
2023-11-09 5:49 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] powerpc/smp: Avoid asym packing within thread_group of a core Srikar Dronamraju
2023-11-09 5:49 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] powerpc/smp: Dynamically build Powerpc topology Srikar Dronamraju
2023-11-15 5:54 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] powerpc/smp: Topology and shared processor optimizations Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-11-15 6:16 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2023-12-11 2:56 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2023-12-11 10:45 ` Michael Ellerman
2023-12-13 11:20 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231115054249.GU2194132@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rmclure@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).