From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EFE6C61D92 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2023 16:30:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=akn0TQ1t; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4SZVGX0gdbz3dH1 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2023 03:30:12 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=akn0TQ1t; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=2604:1380:4641:c500::1; helo=dfw.source.kernel.org; envelope-from=kuba@kernel.org; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4SZVFV4WXMz3cN4 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2023 03:29:18 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 478C461A81; Tue, 21 Nov 2023 16:29:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 914BEC433C7; Tue, 21 Nov 2023 16:29:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1700584148; bh=I7rTz58KR+S4gPSJUCHMuvvrAgbVHDd5w5snGcC6fmI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=akn0TQ1tx9tIwVVjKiVUiShOxIyrgDS6HtWnmTgRUnnSklSjnfnhzl6+GuCsg5RjU 9SptLlLrBWaCEUXZt0ADSJ8CEKkqk2wF9KzP8cpzH4Gx09Owg9SZqDfyLEIg5QoKtl yQghzy2Lc/VM67gqmGXGWcz4FaVbhGzQPssRmIrwgDrV26t4om/KFBJPyKHznpDeiP wuqu+EX+sVaxwVH4N3+S5L9cHSc3CZb/Ev9j42UeMW/BbZmfG/VtCndmMqUDv495E7 YkCJYcWckqEaSJD5gcvnhn23OD3MEoSCXL9FZ8InCUW36S86FsgcPUYQUVaL1QHMTK eeh5PRJrW3VzQ== Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 08:29:06 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Herve Codina Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/27] Add support for QMC HDLC, framer infrastructure and PEF2256 framer Message-ID: <20231121082906.354c9a7e@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20231121084330.4064bf14@bootlin.com> References: <20231115144007.478111-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com> <20231117164746.0589e955@kernel.org> <573c9ca1-a560-4f7a-ba21-80673a2e162e@sirena.org.uk> <20231121084330.4064bf14@bootlin.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Andrew Lunn , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Thomas Petazzoni , Xiubo Li , Linus Walleij , Jaroslav Kysela , Eric Dumazet , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Fabio Estevam , Qiang Zhao , Shengjiu Wang , Lee Jones , Paolo Abeni , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Conor Dooley , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nicolin Chen , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Christophe JAILLET , Takashi Iwai , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Randy Dunlap , Liam Girdwood , Li Yang , Mark Brown , Simon Horman , lin uxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "David S. Miller" Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 08:43:30 +0100 Herve Codina wrote: > I plan to send the v10 with the patch 23 fixed. > Based on that v10, some patches (21 to 25 at least) could be applied and > I will remove them for the future v11. > I think it will be easier to follow if I iterate on the series removing > patches as soon as they are applied. It'd be helpful if you only reposted the patches you expect to be applied, as a standalone series.