linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
To: manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org
Cc: imx@lists.linux.dev, kw@linux.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	lpieralisi@kernel.org, Frank.Li@nxp.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, minghuan.Lian@nxp.com,
	mingkai.hu@nxp.com, roy.zang@nxp.com, bhelgaas@google.com,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, robh@kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 3/4] PCI: layerscape: Rename pf_* as pf_lut_*
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 16:44:11 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231129214412.327633-4-Frank.Li@nxp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231129214412.327633-1-Frank.Li@nxp.com>

'pf' and 'lut' is just difference name in difference chips, but basic it is
a MMIO base address plus an offset.

Rename it to avoid duplicate pf_* and lut_* in driver.

Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
---

Notes:
    pf_lut is better than pf_* or lut* because some chip use 'pf', some chip
    use 'lut'.
    
    change from v1 to v4
    - new patch at v3

 drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c | 34 ++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
index 42bca2c3b5c3e..590e07bb27002 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
 #define PCIE_IATU_NUM		6
 
 struct ls_pcie_drvdata {
-	const u32 pf_off;
+	const u32 pf_lut_off;
 	const struct dw_pcie_host_ops *ops;
 	int (*exit_from_l2)(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp);
 	bool scfg_support;
@@ -54,13 +54,13 @@ struct ls_pcie_drvdata {
 struct ls_pcie {
 	struct dw_pcie *pci;
 	const struct ls_pcie_drvdata *drvdata;
-	void __iomem *pf_base;
+	void __iomem *pf_lut_base;
 	struct regmap *scfg;
 	int index;
 	bool big_endian;
 };
 
-#define ls_pcie_pf_readl_addr(addr)	ls_pcie_pf_readl(pcie, addr)
+#define ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl_addr(addr)	ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl(pcie, addr)
 #define to_ls_pcie(x)	dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev)
 
 static bool ls_pcie_is_bridge(struct ls_pcie *pcie)
@@ -101,20 +101,20 @@ static void ls_pcie_fix_error_response(struct ls_pcie *pcie)
 	iowrite32(PCIE_ABSERR_SETTING, pci->dbi_base + PCIE_ABSERR);
 }
 
-static u32 ls_pcie_pf_readl(struct ls_pcie *pcie, u32 off)
+static u32 ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl(struct ls_pcie *pcie, u32 off)
 {
 	if (pcie->big_endian)
-		return ioread32be(pcie->pf_base + off);
+		return ioread32be(pcie->pf_lut_base + off);
 
-	return ioread32(pcie->pf_base + off);
+	return ioread32(pcie->pf_lut_base + off);
 }
 
-static void ls_pcie_pf_writel(struct ls_pcie *pcie, u32 off, u32 val)
+static void ls_pcie_pf_lut_writel(struct ls_pcie *pcie, u32 off, u32 val)
 {
 	if (pcie->big_endian)
-		iowrite32be(val, pcie->pf_base + off);
+		iowrite32be(val, pcie->pf_lut_base + off);
 	else
-		iowrite32(val, pcie->pf_base + off);
+		iowrite32(val, pcie->pf_lut_base + off);
 }
 
 static void ls_pcie_send_turnoff_msg(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
@@ -124,11 +124,11 @@ static void ls_pcie_send_turnoff_msg(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
 	u32 val;
 	int ret;
 
-	val = ls_pcie_pf_readl(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR);
+	val = ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR);
 	val |= PF_MCR_PTOMR;
-	ls_pcie_pf_writel(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR, val);
+	ls_pcie_pf_lut_writel(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR, val);
 
-	ret = readx_poll_timeout(ls_pcie_pf_readl_addr, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR,
+	ret = readx_poll_timeout(ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl_addr, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR,
 				 val, !(val & PF_MCR_PTOMR),
 				 PCIE_PME_TO_L2_TIMEOUT_US/10,
 				 PCIE_PME_TO_L2_TIMEOUT_US);
@@ -147,15 +147,15 @@ static int ls_pcie_exit_from_l2(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
 	 * Set PF_MCR_EXL2S bit in LS_PCIE_PF_MCR register for the link
 	 * to exit L2 state.
 	 */
-	val = ls_pcie_pf_readl(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR);
+	val = ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR);
 	val |= PF_MCR_EXL2S;
-	ls_pcie_pf_writel(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR, val);
+	ls_pcie_pf_lut_writel(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR, val);
 
 	/*
 	 * L2 exit timeout of 10ms is not defined in the specifications,
 	 * it was chosen based on empirical observations.
 	 */
-	ret = readx_poll_timeout(ls_pcie_pf_readl_addr, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR,
+	ret = readx_poll_timeout(ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl_addr, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR,
 				 val, !(val & PF_MCR_EXL2S),
 				 1000,
 				 10000);
@@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ static const struct ls_pcie_drvdata ls1021a_drvdata = {
 };
 
 static const struct ls_pcie_drvdata layerscape_drvdata = {
-	.pf_off = 0xc0000,
+	.pf_lut_off = 0xc0000,
 	.pm_support = true,
 	.exit_from_l2 = ls_pcie_exit_from_l2,
 };
@@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ static int ls_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	pcie->big_endian = of_property_read_bool(dev->of_node, "big-endian");
 
-	pcie->pf_base = pci->dbi_base + pcie->drvdata->pf_off;
+	pcie->pf_lut_base = pci->dbi_base + pcie->drvdata->pf_lut_off;
 
 	if (pcie->drvdata->scfg_support) {
 		pcie->scfg = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(dev->of_node, "fsl,pcie-scfg");
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-11-29 21:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-29 21:44 [PATCH v4 0/4] dwc general suspend/resume functionality Frank Li
2023-11-29 21:44 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] PCI: layerscape: Add function pointer for exit_from_l2() Frank Li
2023-11-29 21:44 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] PCI: layerscape: Add suspend/resume for ls1021a Frank Li
2023-11-30 16:43   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-11-29 21:44 ` Frank Li [this message]
2023-11-30 16:46   ` [PATCH v4 3/4] PCI: layerscape: Rename pf_* as pf_lut_* Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-11-29 21:44 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] PCI: layerscape: Add suspend/resume for ls1043a Frank Li
2023-11-30 16:51   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-11-30 20:17     ` Frank Li
2023-11-30 20:22       ` Frank Li
2023-12-01  3:30         ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-12-01  3:28       ` Manivannan Sadhasivam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231129214412.327633-4-Frank.Li@nxp.com \
    --to=frank.li@nxp.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=minghuan.Lian@nxp.com \
    --cc=mingkai.hu@nxp.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=roy.zang@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).