linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/9] powerpc/kprobes: Use ftrace to determine if a probe is at function entry
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2023 14:39:50 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231211143950.980b4ab4e11b71de04332540@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15f0b3a2e72326423cfb4ce4e89afff540042245.1702045299.git.naveen@kernel.org>

On Fri,  8 Dec 2023 22:00:44 +0530
Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> wrote:

> Rather than hard-coding the offset into a function to be used to
> determine if a kprobe is at function entry, use ftrace_location() to
> determine the ftrace location within the function and categorize all
> instructions till that offset to be function entry.
> 
> For functions that cannot be traced, we fall back to using a fixed
> offset of 8 (two instructions) to categorize a probe as being at
> function entry for 64-bit elfv2.
> 

OK, so this can cover both KPROBES_ON_FTRACE=y/n cases and the function
is traced by ftrace or not.

Looks good to me.

Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>

Thanks,

> Signed-off-by: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c | 18 ++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
> index b20ee72e873a..42665dfab59e 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
> @@ -105,24 +105,22 @@ kprobe_opcode_t *kprobe_lookup_name(const char *name, unsigned int offset)
>  	return addr;
>  }
>  
> -static bool arch_kprobe_on_func_entry(unsigned long offset)
> +static bool arch_kprobe_on_func_entry(unsigned long addr, unsigned long offset)
>  {
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64_ELF_ABI_V2
> -#ifdef CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE
> -	return offset <= 16;
> -#else
> -	return offset <= 8;
> -#endif
> -#else
> +	unsigned long ip = ftrace_location(addr);
> +
> +	if (ip)
> +		return offset <= (ip - addr);
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC64_ELF_ABI_V2))
> +		return offset <= 8;
>  	return !offset;
> -#endif
>  }
>  
>  /* XXX try and fold the magic of kprobe_lookup_name() in this */
>  kprobe_opcode_t *arch_adjust_kprobe_addr(unsigned long addr, unsigned long offset,
>  					 bool *on_func_entry)
>  {
> -	*on_func_entry = arch_kprobe_on_func_entry(offset);
> +	*on_func_entry = arch_kprobe_on_func_entry(addr, offset);
>  	return (kprobe_opcode_t *)(addr + offset);
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-11  5:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-08 16:30 [RFC PATCH 0/9] powerpc: ftrace updates Naveen N Rao
2023-12-08 16:30 ` [RFC PATCH 1/9] powerpc/ftrace: Fix indentation in ftrace.h Naveen N Rao
2023-12-08 16:30 ` [RFC PATCH 2/9] powerpc/ftrace: Unify 32-bit and 64-bit ftrace entry code Naveen N Rao
2023-12-08 16:30 ` [RFC PATCH 3/9] powerpc/ftrace: Remove nops after the call to ftrace_stub Naveen N Rao
2023-12-08 16:30 ` [RFC PATCH 4/9] powerpc/Kconfig: Select FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT_4B Naveen N Rao
2023-12-08 16:30 ` [RFC PATCH 5/9] powerpc/kprobes: Use ftrace to determine if a probe is at function entry Naveen N Rao
2023-12-11  5:39   ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2023-12-08 16:30 ` [RFC PATCH 6/9] powerpc/ftrace: Update and move function profile instructions out-of-line Naveen N Rao
2023-12-21 10:46   ` Christophe Leroy
2023-12-21 14:25     ` Steven Rostedt
2023-12-21 15:20       ` Christophe Leroy
2023-12-22 15:01     ` Naveen N Rao
2023-12-08 16:30 ` [RFC PATCH 7/9] powerpc/ftrace: Add support for DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_CALL_OPS Naveen N Rao
2023-12-08 16:30 ` [RFC PATCH 8/9] powerpc/ftrace: Add support for DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_DIRECT_CALLS Naveen N Rao
2023-12-08 16:30 ` [RFC PATCH 9/9] samples/ftrace: Add support for ftrace direct samples on powerpc Naveen N Rao
2023-12-21 10:38 ` (subset) [RFC PATCH 0/9] powerpc: ftrace updates Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231211143950.980b4ab4e11b71de04332540@kernel.org \
    --to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=naveen@kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=revest@chromium.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).