From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: aneesh.kumar@kernel.org, npiggin@gmail.com,
naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/pseries: fix accuracy of stolen time
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 11:42:45 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240213061245.GB243379@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240213052635.231597-1-sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
* Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com> [2024-02-13 10:56:35]:
> powerVM hypervisor updates the VPA fields with stolen time data.
> It currently reports enqueue_dispatch_tb and ready_enqueue_tb for
> this purpose. In linux these two fields are used to report the stolen time.
>
> The VPA fields are updated at the TB frequency. On powerPC its mostly
> set at 512Mhz. Hence this needs a conversion to ns when reporting it
> back as rest of the kernel timings are in ns. This conversion is already
> handled in tb_to_ns function. So use that function to report accurate
> stolen time.
>
> Observed this issue and used an Capped Shared Processor LPAR(SPLPAR) to
> simplify the experiments. In all these cases, 100% VP Load is run using
> stress-ng workload. Values of stolen time is in percentages as reported
> by mpstat. With the patch values are close to expected.
>
> 6.8.rc1 +Patch
> 12EC/12VP 0.0 0.0
> 12EC/24VP 25.7 50.2
> 12EC/36VP 37.3 69.2
> 12EC/48VP 38.5 78.3
>
>
> Fixes: 0e8a63132800 ("powerpc/pseries: Implement CONFIG_PARAVIRT_TIME_ACCOUNTING")
> Signed-off-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-13 6:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-13 5:26 [PATCH] powerpc/pseries: fix accuracy of stolen time Shrikanth Hegde
2024-02-13 5:53 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-02-13 6:12 ` Srikar Dronamraju [this message]
2024-02-15 12:57 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240213061245.GB243379@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).