From: Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@linux.dev>
To: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Cc: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>, Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@redhat.com>,
Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>, Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 01/18] Makefile: Define __ASSEMBLY__ for assembly files
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 20:13:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240215-8527d5fd0c830d5d8d07f668@orel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zc5G0Uu1QxJ1Qt36@raptor>
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 05:16:01PM +0000, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
> Hi Drew,
>
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 05:32:22PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 04:05:56PM +0000, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
> > > Hi Drew,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 01:44:17PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 04:07:03AM -0500, Shaoqin Huang wrote:
> > > > > From: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > There are 25 header files today (found with grep -r "#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__)
> > > > > with functionality relies on the __ASSEMBLY__ prepocessor constant being
> > > > > correctly defined to work correctly. So far, kvm-unit-tests has relied on
> > > > > the assembly files to define the constant before including any header
> > > > > files which depend on it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Let's make sure that nobody gets this wrong and define it as a compiler
> > > > > constant when compiling assembly files. __ASSEMBLY__ is now defined for all
> > > > > .S files, even those that didn't set it explicitely before.
> > > > >
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@linux.dev>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@redhat.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > Makefile | 5 ++++-
> > > > > arm/cstart.S | 1 -
> > > > > arm/cstart64.S | 1 -
> > > > > powerpc/cstart64.S | 1 -
> > > > > 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> > > > > index 602910dd..27ed14e6 100644
> > > > > --- a/Makefile
> > > > > +++ b/Makefile
> > > > > @@ -92,6 +92,9 @@ CFLAGS += -Woverride-init -Wmissing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes
> > > > >
> > > > > autodepend-flags = -MMD -MP -MF $(dir $*).$(notdir $*).d
> > > > >
> > > > > +AFLAGS = $(CFLAGS)
> > > > > +AFLAGS += -D__ASSEMBLY__
> > > > > +
> > > > > LDFLAGS += -nostdlib $(no_pie) -z noexecstack
> > > > >
> > > > > $(libcflat): $(cflatobjs)
> > > > > @@ -113,7 +116,7 @@ directories:
> > > > > @mkdir -p $(OBJDIRS)
> > > > >
> > > > > %.o: %.S
> > > > > - $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -c -nostdlib -o $@ $<
> > > > > + $(CC) $(AFLAGS) -c -nostdlib -o $@ $<
> > > >
> > > > I think we can drop the two hunks above from this patch and just rely on
> > > > the compiler to add __ASSEMBLY__ for us when compiling assembly files.
> > >
> > > I think the precompiler adds __ASSEMBLER__, not __ASSEMBLY__ [1]. Am I
> > > missing something?
> > >
> > > [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/cpp/macros/predefined-macros.html#c.__ASSEMBLER__
> >
> > You're right. I'm not opposed to changing all the __ASSEMBLY__ references
> > to __ASSEMBLER__. I'll try to do that at some point unless you beat me to
> > it.
>
> Actually, I quite prefer the Linux style of using __ASSEMBLY__ instead of
> __ASSEMBLER__, because it makes reusing Linux files easier. That, and the
> habit formed by staring at Linux assembly files.
Those are good arguments and also saves the churn. OK, let's keep this
patch and __ASSEMBLY__
Thanks,
drew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-15 19:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-30 9:07 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 00/18] arm/arm64: Rework cache maintenance at boot Shaoqin Huang
2023-11-30 9:07 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 01/18] Makefile: Define __ASSEMBLY__ for assembly files Shaoqin Huang
2024-01-15 12:44 ` Andrew Jones
2024-02-15 16:05 ` Alexandru Elisei
2024-02-15 16:32 ` Andrew Jones
2024-02-15 17:16 ` Alexandru Elisei
2024-02-15 19:13 ` Andrew Jones [this message]
2023-11-30 9:07 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 02/18] powerpc: Replace the physical allocator with the page allocator Shaoqin Huang
2023-11-30 10:35 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 00/18] arm/arm64: Rework cache maintenance at boot Alexandru Elisei
2023-12-01 8:40 ` Shaoqin Huang
2024-02-16 15:47 ` Alexandru Elisei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240215-8527d5fd0c830d5d8d07f668@orel \
--to=andrew.jones@linux.dev \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=namit@vmware.com \
--cc=nikos.nikoleris@arm.com \
--cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=shahuang@redhat.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox