From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 252A2C5475B for ; Wed, 6 Mar 2024 10:47:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=LbQeHk8k; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=LbQeHk8k; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4TqTfV5zjBz3w0X for ; Wed, 6 Mar 2024 21:47:46 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=LbQeHk8k; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=LbQeHk8k; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com (client-ip=170.10.133.124; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com; envelope-from=peterx@redhat.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TqTY272zKz3vh6 for ; Wed, 6 Mar 2024 21:43:02 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1709721780; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=4C+lWpN1qDfU+nymiqOVXkY7IqPiijqTb8F5rFjpmTU=; b=LbQeHk8k2li4/7eSaMo4IN64byATygW/kI9iRPAATUuVIZuYJPAz7C5YSFIb6msXTgXuBG TbAVX/EEmSOIB7fDeXY484lQLC0nuG+TMsJAs5zgqUHpnHm62tEvhVo1RR3//JMTvR12/G 4UQew2RKktHtXykcdAH7apHHsKPZKmw= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1709721780; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=4C+lWpN1qDfU+nymiqOVXkY7IqPiijqTb8F5rFjpmTU=; b=LbQeHk8k2li4/7eSaMo4IN64byATygW/kI9iRPAATUuVIZuYJPAz7C5YSFIb6msXTgXuBG TbAVX/EEmSOIB7fDeXY484lQLC0nuG+TMsJAs5zgqUHpnHm62tEvhVo1RR3//JMTvR12/G 4UQew2RKktHtXykcdAH7apHHsKPZKmw= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-622-aSR7lTs0MGOXGlrFM8hoQg-1; Wed, 06 Mar 2024 05:42:54 -0500 X-MC-Unique: aSR7lTs0MGOXGlrFM8hoQg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7927980F7E3; Wed, 6 Mar 2024 10:42:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from x1n.redhat.com (unknown [10.72.116.8]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A34D7111DCFF; Wed, 6 Mar 2024 10:42:44 +0000 (UTC) From: peterx@redhat.com To: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH RFC 07/13] mm/arm: Redefine pmd_huge() with pmd_leaf() Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 18:41:41 +0800 Message-ID: <20240306104147.193052-8-peterx@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20240306104147.193052-1-peterx@redhat.com> References: <20240306104147.193052-1-peterx@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.3 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, x86@kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Shawn Guo , Bjorn Andersson , Muchun Song , Russell King , peterx@redhat.com, Konrad Dybcio , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Fabio Estevam , Matthew Wilcox , Jason Gunthorpe , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Mike Rapoport Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" From: Peter Xu Most of the archs already define these two APIs the same way. ARM is more complicated in two aspects: - For pXd_huge() it's always checking against !PXD_TABLE_BIT, while for pXd_leaf() it's always checking against PXD_TYPE_SECT. - SECT/TABLE bits are defined differently on 2-level v.s. 3-level ARM pgtables, which makes the whole thing even harder to follow. Luckily, the second complexity should be hidden by the pmd_leaf() implementation against 2-level v.s. 3-level headers. Invoke pmd_leaf() directly for pmd_huge(), to remove the first part of complexity. This prepares to drop pXd_huge() API globally. When at it, drop the obsolete comments - it's outdated. Cc: Russell King Cc: Shawn Guo Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Bjorn Andersson Cc: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Konrad Dybcio Cc: Fabio Estevam Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Signed-off-by: Peter Xu --- arch/arm/mm/hugetlbpage.c | 7 +------ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/hugetlbpage.c b/arch/arm/mm/hugetlbpage.c index dd7a0277c5c0..c2fa643f6bb5 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mm/hugetlbpage.c +++ b/arch/arm/mm/hugetlbpage.c @@ -18,11 +18,6 @@ #include #include -/* - * On ARM, huge pages are backed by pmd's rather than pte's, so we do a lot - * of type casting from pmd_t * to pte_t *. - */ - int pud_huge(pud_t pud) { return 0; @@ -30,5 +25,5 @@ int pud_huge(pud_t pud) int pmd_huge(pmd_t pmd) { - return pmd_val(pmd) && !(pmd_val(pmd) & PMD_TABLE_BIT); + return pmd_leaf(pmd); } -- 2.44.0