From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BFC1CD11DD for ; Fri, 29 Mar 2024 13:24:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=korg header.b=rFKYRxMF; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4V5h324nCBz3vZT for ; Sat, 30 Mar 2024 00:24:46 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=korg header.b=rFKYRxMF; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linuxfoundation.org (client-ip=2604:1380:40e1:4800::1; helo=sin.source.kernel.org; envelope-from=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from sin.source.kernel.org (sin.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:40e1:4800::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4V5h2F06fQz3d4D for ; Sat, 30 Mar 2024 00:24:03 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sin.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D58E3CE2F7C; Fri, 29 Mar 2024 13:23:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A2D88C433F1; Fri, 29 Mar 2024 13:23:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1711718639; bh=bQx/BXOUSe4TNoDtXR2BXWY0aFMLcADXigMMWJW/L3A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=rFKYRxMFWgbTseJJMATejdwMQAFlQv/Gg01agjZQWEoWMUuHtWmzii0H62Wzpj5KT wuktrBJ0GoAHlP5XS1yvLuqjYvss3CWMTe1AnvlI8Hc9WtLczeN0VHc6JwfzhxEcHJ IW/M9vWYf3kCbr3JTTZZT+rhIEPz01karffLPpVI= Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 14:23:39 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Nathan Chancellor Subject: Re: FAILED: Patch "powerpc: xor_vmx: Add '-mhard-float' to CFLAGS" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree Message-ID: <2024032925-tapering-correct-c88c@gregkh> References: <20240327122007.2835763-1-sashal@kernel.org> <20240327151613.GA1153323@dev-arch.thelio-3990X> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240327151613.GA1153323@dev-arch.thelio-3990X> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Sasha Levin , llvm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 08:16:13AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 08:20:07AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: > > The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree. > > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm > > tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit > > id to . > ... > > ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ > > > > From 35f20786c481d5ced9283ff42de5c69b65e5ed13 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Nathan Chancellor > > Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2024 11:07:43 -0700 > > Subject: [PATCH] powerpc: xor_vmx: Add '-mhard-float' to CFLAGS > > I have attached a backport that will work for 5.15 and earlier. I think > you worked around this conflict in 5.15 by taking 04e85bbf71c9 but I am > not sure that is a smart idea. I think it might just be better to drop > that dependency and apply this version in 5.15. I'll go drop it and take this version, thanks! greg k-h