From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10DF2CD11C2 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 08:26:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=korg header.b=KDPNsaBu; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4VDws24y4cz3vYc for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 18:26:14 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=korg header.b=KDPNsaBu; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linuxfoundation.org (client-ip=145.40.73.55; helo=sin.source.kernel.org; envelope-from=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from sin.source.kernel.org (sin.source.kernel.org [145.40.73.55]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VDwrF1dJ0z3bWH for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 18:25:31 +1000 (AEST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sin.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E5C6CE2645; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 08:25:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 222B4C433F1; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 08:25:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1712737529; bh=Dhybrf/jRqbpyhuhIWlZvPbxMVOS0VFGt4WJR1DnMNo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=KDPNsaBudn+n4+RXzxU38zA293P9i01hK4pr+EzsNlygvUAPOjzwvf/oUbikrXg95 /N9KFTY1uuvoJgBUoJH4BkRDQEIr3X5LSBVt6P6w3X2XFz+Etf1/yCAYNPWYH2L813 KkAO4Cql9cMJLXpMa0g0EbkaGil+/s1j6TdGGz4k= Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 10:25:26 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Drop Li Yang as their email address stopped working Message-ID: <2024041010-neuron-vividness-8202@gregkh> References: <20240405072042.697182-2-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> <20240409144204.00cc76ce@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Li Yang , Zhang Wei , kernel@pengutronix.de, Jakub Kicinski , Shawn Guo , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 08:42:06AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 02:42:04PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 09:20:41 +0200 Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > > When sending a patch to (among others) Li Yang the nxp MTA replied that > > > the address doesn't exist and so the mail couldn't be delivered. The > > > error code was 550, so at least technically that's not a temporal issue. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König > > > > FWIW it's eaac25d026a1 in net, thanks! > > Greg also picked it up, it's fbdd90334a6205e8a99d0bc2dfc738ee438f00bc in > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb.git usb-linus > . Both are included in next-20240410. I guess that's not a big problem. > (And please prevent that the patch is dropped from both trees as it's > already included in the other :-) We already got a report from linux-next about this, it's fine, we will both keep it. thanks, greg k-h