From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 370CCC4345F for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 02:32:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=l95Ul+/T; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4VQ0JP4879z3dBs for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 12:32:53 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=l95Ul+/T; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=139.178.84.217; helo=dfw.source.kernel.org; envelope-from=kuba@kernel.org; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VQ0HY06t7z3cRB for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 12:32:08 +1000 (AEST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EE5F61B23; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 02:32:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 94257C113CD; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 02:32:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1714012326; bh=nAygzTdKA7gXwOCRlEv0GHS1Jlllbh/PJCpLHTfVyZ8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=l95Ul+/TszTvgQgaS+2oB2XjSuinyC5Ndzqb8ogevjQn2wRGZIKRCs3XOTCYoeH99 SmC5TnalrDMs5NWkixVFud4Zj9Hl0cno7TJVBwGTvWMMDYgBZpVOB/O0ZbESZpwE5k zjKAnLa9KL+dFGz4gUHPnbyAuBnaoiso6WA5Tv76uV/DYEXOFUYJFD/V/2P0GRgu0I sLD/lH4h3kkUr7lWECblfnJ4pZJcshHtbIijQ3jv7ucKEvkv11qBcLxuN7JpR8JRq2 NmVpwTRM8w7lk/iZpzvBWAZefSzlhPeyk+srjmVplAdO+LE6tyFO0QrVNAHAA4bBms PXvHHg13o0hWA== Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 19:32:04 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Dan Carpenter Subject: Re: [PATCH] ibmvnic: Use -EBUSY in __ibmvnic_reset() Message-ID: <20240424193204.39cde604@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <4cff158d-b5ac-4dca-9fbb-626237c1eafe@web.de> <7e3f43a3-98e0-40ed-8820-2f1eef8742ba@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Nick Child , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Rick Lindsley , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Falcon , LKML , "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , Nicholas Piggin , Eric Dumazet , Markus Elfring , Haren Myneni , "Naveen N. Rao" , Paolo Abeni , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "David S. Miller" Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 18:41:48 +0300 Dan Carpenter wrote: > > So, the point of the patch not doing any behavioral differences is still > > true. > > Ah yes. You're right. Hard call but overall I think this wasted more reviewer time than it's worth. So in the spirit of not encouraging noise I'm not applying this. -- pw-bot: reject