From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@linux.dev>
Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 02/31] report: Add known failure reporting option
Date: Sat, 4 May 2024 22:28:08 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240504122841.1177683-3-npiggin@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240504122841.1177683-1-npiggin@gmail.com>
There are times we would like to test a function that is known to fail
in some conditions due to a bug in implementation (QEMU, KVM, or even
hardware). It would be nice to count these as known failures and not
report a summary failure.
xfail is not the same thing, xfail means failure is required and a pass
causes the test to fail. So add kfail for known failures.
Mark the failing ppc64 h_cede_tm and spapr_vpa tests as kfail.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
---
lib/libcflat.h | 2 ++
lib/report.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/libcflat.h b/lib/libcflat.h
index 700f43527..ae3c2c6d0 100644
--- a/lib/libcflat.h
+++ b/lib/libcflat.h
@@ -100,6 +100,8 @@ extern void report(bool pass, const char *msg_fmt, ...)
__attribute__((format(printf, 2, 3), nonnull(2)));
extern void report_xfail(bool xfail, bool pass, const char *msg_fmt, ...)
__attribute__((format(printf, 3, 4), nonnull(3)));
+extern void report_kfail(bool kfail, bool pass, const char *msg_fmt, ...)
+ __attribute__((format(printf, 3, 4), nonnull(3)));
extern void report_abort(const char *msg_fmt, ...)
__attribute__((format(printf, 1, 2)))
__attribute__((noreturn));
diff --git a/lib/report.c b/lib/report.c
index 8e9bff5b8..7f3c4f059 100644
--- a/lib/report.c
+++ b/lib/report.c
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
#include "libcflat.h"
#include "asm/spinlock.h"
-static unsigned int tests, failures, xfailures, skipped;
+static unsigned int tests, failures, xfailures, kfailures, skipped;
static char prefixes[256];
static struct spinlock lock;
@@ -81,11 +81,12 @@ void report_prefix_pop(void)
}
static void va_report(const char *msg_fmt,
- bool pass, bool xfail, bool skip, va_list va)
+ bool pass, bool xfail, bool kfail, bool skip, va_list va)
{
const char *prefix = skip ? "SKIP"
: xfail ? (pass ? "XPASS" : "XFAIL")
- : (pass ? "PASS" : "FAIL");
+ : kfail ? (pass ? "PASS" : "KFAIL")
+ : (pass ? "PASS" : "FAIL");
spin_lock(&lock);
@@ -98,6 +99,8 @@ static void va_report(const char *msg_fmt,
skipped++;
else if (xfail && !pass)
xfailures++;
+ else if (kfail && !pass)
+ kfailures++;
else if (xfail || !pass)
failures++;
@@ -108,7 +111,7 @@ void report(bool pass, const char *msg_fmt, ...)
{
va_list va;
va_start(va, msg_fmt);
- va_report(msg_fmt, pass, false, false, va);
+ va_report(msg_fmt, pass, false, false, false, va);
va_end(va);
}
@@ -117,7 +120,7 @@ void report_pass(const char *msg_fmt, ...)
va_list va;
va_start(va, msg_fmt);
- va_report(msg_fmt, true, false, false, va);
+ va_report(msg_fmt, true, false, false, false, va);
va_end(va);
}
@@ -126,7 +129,7 @@ void report_fail(const char *msg_fmt, ...)
va_list va;
va_start(va, msg_fmt);
- va_report(msg_fmt, false, false, false, va);
+ va_report(msg_fmt, false, false, false, false, va);
va_end(va);
}
@@ -134,7 +137,19 @@ void report_xfail(bool xfail, bool pass, const char *msg_fmt, ...)
{
va_list va;
va_start(va, msg_fmt);
- va_report(msg_fmt, pass, xfail, false, va);
+ va_report(msg_fmt, pass, xfail, false, false, va);
+ va_end(va);
+}
+
+/*
+ * kfail is known failure. If kfail is true then test will succeed
+ * regardless of pass.
+ */
+void report_kfail(bool kfail, bool pass, const char *msg_fmt, ...)
+{
+ va_list va;
+ va_start(va, msg_fmt);
+ va_report(msg_fmt, pass, false, kfail, false, va);
va_end(va);
}
@@ -142,7 +157,7 @@ void report_skip(const char *msg_fmt, ...)
{
va_list va;
va_start(va, msg_fmt);
- va_report(msg_fmt, false, false, true, va);
+ va_report(msg_fmt, false, false, false, true, va);
va_end(va);
}
@@ -168,6 +183,8 @@ int report_summary(void)
printf("SUMMARY: %d tests", tests);
if (failures)
printf(", %d unexpected failures", failures);
+ if (kfailures)
+ printf(", %d known failures", kfailures);
if (xfailures)
printf(", %d expected failures", xfailures);
if (skipped)
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-04 12:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-04 12:28 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 00/31] powerpc improvements Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 01/31] doc: update unittests doc Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-06 7:03 ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-07 3:57 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-06 8:02 ` Andrew Jones
2024-05-04 12:28 ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2024-05-06 7:25 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 02/31] report: Add known failure reporting option Thomas Huth
2024-05-06 8:01 ` Andrew Jones
2024-05-06 10:19 ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 03/31] powerpc: Mark known failing tests as kfail Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-06 7:37 ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-07 4:07 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-07 11:44 ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 04/31] powerpc: Update unittests for latest QEMU version Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 05/31] powerpc/sprs: Specify SPRs with data rather than code Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 06/31] powerpc/sprs: Avoid taking PMU interrupts caused by register fuzzing Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 07/31] scripts: allow machine option to be specified in unittests.cfg Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-07 15:08 ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-08 12:27 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-08 12:55 ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-08 12:58 ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-08 13:36 ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-09 5:44 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 08/31] scripts: Accommodate powerpc powernv machine differences Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 09/31] powerpc: Support powernv machine with QEMU TCG Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 10/31] powerpc: Fix emulator illegal instruction test for powernv Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 11/31] powerpc/sprs: Test hypervisor registers on powernv machine Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 12/31] powerpc: general interrupt tests Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-07 12:12 ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 13/31] powerpc: Add rtas stop-self support Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 14/31] powerpc: Remove broken SMP exception stack setup Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-03 9:30 ` Thomas Huth
2024-06-04 5:13 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 15/31] powerpc: Enable page alloc operations Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-03 9:34 ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 16/31] powerpc: add SMP and IPI support Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-04 5:14 ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 17/31] powerpc: Add cpu_relax Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-07 13:44 ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 18/31] powerpc: Permit ACCEL=tcg,thread=single Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-04 5:17 ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 19/31] powerpc: Avoid using larx/stcx. in spinlocks when only one CPU is running Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-04 5:27 ` Thomas Huth
2024-06-05 0:56 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 20/31] powerpc: Add atomics tests Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-04 5:29 ` Thomas Huth
2024-06-05 0:56 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 21/31] powerpc: Add timebase tests Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-04 6:12 ` Thomas Huth
2024-06-05 1:04 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 22/31] powerpc: Add MMU support Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-04 7:30 ` Thomas Huth
2024-06-05 1:06 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 23/31] common/sieve: Use vmalloc.h for setup_mmu definition Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-04 7:53 ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 24/31] common/sieve: Support machines without MMU Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-04 9:30 ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 25/31] powerpc: Add sieve.c common test Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-04 9:30 ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 26/31] powerpc: add usermode support Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-04 10:26 ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 27/31] powerpc: add pmu tests Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-04 10:38 ` Thomas Huth
2024-06-05 1:12 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 28/31] configure: Make arch_libdir a first-class entity Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 29/31] powerpc: Remove remnants of ppc64 directory and build structure Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-04 10:49 ` Thomas Huth
2024-06-04 13:36 ` Andrew Jones
2024-06-05 7:52 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 30/31] powerpc: Add facility to query TCG or KVM host Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-04 10:53 ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 31/31] powerpc: gitlab CI update Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-04 11:01 ` Thomas Huth
2024-06-05 1:16 ` Nicholas Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240504122841.1177683-3-npiggin@gmail.com \
--to=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew.jones@linux.dev \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).