linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@linux.dev>
Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 02/31] report: Add known failure reporting option
Date: Sat,  4 May 2024 22:28:08 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240504122841.1177683-3-npiggin@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240504122841.1177683-1-npiggin@gmail.com>

There are times we would like to test a function that is known to fail
in some conditions due to a bug in implementation (QEMU, KVM, or even
hardware). It would be nice to count these as known failures and not
report a summary failure.

xfail is not the same thing, xfail means failure is required and a pass
causes the test to fail. So add kfail for known failures.

Mark the failing ppc64 h_cede_tm and spapr_vpa tests as kfail.

Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
---
 lib/libcflat.h |  2 ++
 lib/report.c   | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/libcflat.h b/lib/libcflat.h
index 700f43527..ae3c2c6d0 100644
--- a/lib/libcflat.h
+++ b/lib/libcflat.h
@@ -100,6 +100,8 @@ extern void report(bool pass, const char *msg_fmt, ...)
 		__attribute__((format(printf, 2, 3), nonnull(2)));
 extern void report_xfail(bool xfail, bool pass, const char *msg_fmt, ...)
 		__attribute__((format(printf, 3, 4), nonnull(3)));
+extern void report_kfail(bool kfail, bool pass, const char *msg_fmt, ...)
+		__attribute__((format(printf, 3, 4), nonnull(3)));
 extern void report_abort(const char *msg_fmt, ...)
 					__attribute__((format(printf, 1, 2)))
 					__attribute__((noreturn));
diff --git a/lib/report.c b/lib/report.c
index 8e9bff5b8..7f3c4f059 100644
--- a/lib/report.c
+++ b/lib/report.c
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
 #include "libcflat.h"
 #include "asm/spinlock.h"
 
-static unsigned int tests, failures, xfailures, skipped;
+static unsigned int tests, failures, xfailures, kfailures, skipped;
 static char prefixes[256];
 static struct spinlock lock;
 
@@ -81,11 +81,12 @@ void report_prefix_pop(void)
 }
 
 static void va_report(const char *msg_fmt,
-		bool pass, bool xfail, bool skip, va_list va)
+		bool pass, bool xfail, bool kfail, bool skip, va_list va)
 {
 	const char *prefix = skip ? "SKIP"
 				  : xfail ? (pass ? "XPASS" : "XFAIL")
-					  : (pass ? "PASS"  : "FAIL");
+				          : kfail ? (pass ? "PASS" : "KFAIL")
+					          : (pass ? "PASS"  : "FAIL");
 
 	spin_lock(&lock);
 
@@ -98,6 +99,8 @@ static void va_report(const char *msg_fmt,
 		skipped++;
 	else if (xfail && !pass)
 		xfailures++;
+	else if (kfail && !pass)
+		kfailures++;
 	else if (xfail || !pass)
 		failures++;
 
@@ -108,7 +111,7 @@ void report(bool pass, const char *msg_fmt, ...)
 {
 	va_list va;
 	va_start(va, msg_fmt);
-	va_report(msg_fmt, pass, false, false, va);
+	va_report(msg_fmt, pass, false, false, false, va);
 	va_end(va);
 }
 
@@ -117,7 +120,7 @@ void report_pass(const char *msg_fmt, ...)
 	va_list va;
 
 	va_start(va, msg_fmt);
-	va_report(msg_fmt, true, false, false, va);
+	va_report(msg_fmt, true, false, false, false, va);
 	va_end(va);
 }
 
@@ -126,7 +129,7 @@ void report_fail(const char *msg_fmt, ...)
 	va_list va;
 
 	va_start(va, msg_fmt);
-	va_report(msg_fmt, false, false, false, va);
+	va_report(msg_fmt, false, false, false, false, va);
 	va_end(va);
 }
 
@@ -134,7 +137,19 @@ void report_xfail(bool xfail, bool pass, const char *msg_fmt, ...)
 {
 	va_list va;
 	va_start(va, msg_fmt);
-	va_report(msg_fmt, pass, xfail, false, va);
+	va_report(msg_fmt, pass, xfail, false, false, va);
+	va_end(va);
+}
+
+/*
+ * kfail is known failure. If kfail is true then test will succeed
+ * regardless of pass.
+ */
+void report_kfail(bool kfail, bool pass, const char *msg_fmt, ...)
+{
+	va_list va;
+	va_start(va, msg_fmt);
+	va_report(msg_fmt, pass, false, kfail, false, va);
 	va_end(va);
 }
 
@@ -142,7 +157,7 @@ void report_skip(const char *msg_fmt, ...)
 {
 	va_list va;
 	va_start(va, msg_fmt);
-	va_report(msg_fmt, false, false, true, va);
+	va_report(msg_fmt, false, false, false, true, va);
 	va_end(va);
 }
 
@@ -168,6 +183,8 @@ int report_summary(void)
 	printf("SUMMARY: %d tests", tests);
 	if (failures)
 		printf(", %d unexpected failures", failures);
+	if (kfailures)
+		printf(", %d known failures", kfailures);
 	if (xfailures)
 		printf(", %d expected failures", xfailures);
 	if (skipped)
-- 
2.43.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-05-04 12:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-04 12:28 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 00/31] powerpc improvements Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 01/31] doc: update unittests doc Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-06  7:03   ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-07  3:57     ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-06  8:02   ` Andrew Jones
2024-05-04 12:28 ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2024-05-06  7:25   ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 02/31] report: Add known failure reporting option Thomas Huth
2024-05-06  8:01     ` Andrew Jones
2024-05-06 10:19       ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 03/31] powerpc: Mark known failing tests as kfail Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-06  7:37   ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-07  4:07     ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-07 11:44       ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 04/31] powerpc: Update unittests for latest QEMU version Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 05/31] powerpc/sprs: Specify SPRs with data rather than code Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 06/31] powerpc/sprs: Avoid taking PMU interrupts caused by register fuzzing Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 07/31] scripts: allow machine option to be specified in unittests.cfg Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-07 15:08   ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-08 12:27     ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-08 12:55       ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-08 12:58         ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-08 13:36           ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-09  5:44             ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 08/31] scripts: Accommodate powerpc powernv machine differences Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 09/31] powerpc: Support powernv machine with QEMU TCG Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 10/31] powerpc: Fix emulator illegal instruction test for powernv Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 11/31] powerpc/sprs: Test hypervisor registers on powernv machine Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 12/31] powerpc: general interrupt tests Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-07 12:12   ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 13/31] powerpc: Add rtas stop-self support Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 14/31] powerpc: Remove broken SMP exception stack setup Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-03  9:30   ` Thomas Huth
2024-06-04  5:13     ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 15/31] powerpc: Enable page alloc operations Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-03  9:34   ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 16/31] powerpc: add SMP and IPI support Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-04  5:14   ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 17/31] powerpc: Add cpu_relax Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-07 13:44   ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 18/31] powerpc: Permit ACCEL=tcg,thread=single Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-04  5:17   ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 19/31] powerpc: Avoid using larx/stcx. in spinlocks when only one CPU is running Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-04  5:27   ` Thomas Huth
2024-06-05  0:56     ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 20/31] powerpc: Add atomics tests Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-04  5:29   ` Thomas Huth
2024-06-05  0:56     ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 21/31] powerpc: Add timebase tests Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-04  6:12   ` Thomas Huth
2024-06-05  1:04     ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 22/31] powerpc: Add MMU support Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-04  7:30   ` Thomas Huth
2024-06-05  1:06     ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 23/31] common/sieve: Use vmalloc.h for setup_mmu definition Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-04  7:53   ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 24/31] common/sieve: Support machines without MMU Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-04  9:30   ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 25/31] powerpc: Add sieve.c common test Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-04  9:30   ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 26/31] powerpc: add usermode support Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-04 10:26   ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 27/31] powerpc: add pmu tests Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-04 10:38   ` Thomas Huth
2024-06-05  1:12     ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 28/31] configure: Make arch_libdir a first-class entity Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 29/31] powerpc: Remove remnants of ppc64 directory and build structure Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-04 10:49   ` Thomas Huth
2024-06-04 13:36     ` Andrew Jones
2024-06-05  7:52       ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 30/31] powerpc: Add facility to query TCG or KVM host Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-04 10:53   ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 31/31] powerpc: gitlab CI update Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-04 11:01   ` Thomas Huth
2024-06-05  1:16     ` Nicholas Piggin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240504122841.1177683-3-npiggin@gmail.com \
    --to=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew.jones@linux.dev \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).