From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B872CC25B74 for ; Thu, 16 May 2024 05:27:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=rothwell.id.au header.i=@rothwell.id.au header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=201702 header.b=Y71SZzMK; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4VfzBb0RYdz3dBg for ; Thu, 16 May 2024 15:27:51 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=rothwell.id.au Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=rothwell.id.au header.i=@rothwell.id.au header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=201702 header.b=Y71SZzMK; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail.rothwell.id.au (gimli.rothwell.id.au [103.230.158.156]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Vfy3B0zrVz3cXg for ; Thu, 16 May 2024 14:36:22 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rothwell.id.au; s=201702; t=1715834180; bh=r1kOvfgIYROHWlLOWok8nOUpUvblp7y8+UA6RrmiDLY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Y71SZzMKdNFi775gwXxXQZntcsEzWtoVGOTUG5yNXVlDLCfBWHVFOjfF9lrhTKObR zWA5kOBA+5xP90d/ObePZi8BufFHwGrkhvOjNa8UhtYsDOQUXNH26cTeulASLhduTI AyQNYfJ7XRX/7E4CHPiU5EQF4yk8yuFMKtlAUNpx3m3n0H6aVPWGkte6shEQGVZ8uz bKQFAO//OtvPlcTLQGCg6F4LlaTWrhLR9D9/ei3sdCWmkDp8fYr3kDFeWqKUxUBW6H UCoalryUFWvtD0cCVMV5dN9jsUCvdXLsPj7b/bwo1bxh9Dw+vHePp2hv/uS79DzpG2 gpaKQqPlg7YqA== Received: from authenticated.rothwell.id.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.rothwell.id.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Vfy354RHgz4L; Thu, 16 May 2024 14:36:17 +1000 (AEST) Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 14:36:12 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Michael Ellerman Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the powerpc tree Message-ID: <20240516143612.1a369133@oak> In-Reply-To: <87cypmwk92.fsf@mail.lhotse> References: <20240515163708.3380c4d1@canb.auug.org.au> <87cypmwk92.fsf@mail.lhotse> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.2.0 (GTK 3.24.41; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/8=rEbHDsm_Vfaw.dcRcMzja"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 16 May 2024 15:27:08 +1000 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Linux Next Mailing List , PowerPC , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Hari Bathini Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" --Sig_/8=rEbHDsm_Vfaw.dcRcMzja Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Michael, On Thu, 16 May 2024 12:42:01 +1000 Michael Ellerman wr= ote: > > Stephen Rothwell writes: > > > > After merging the powerpc tree, today's (it may have been yesterday's) > > linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig) produced this warning: > > > > WARNING: modpost: vmlinux: section mismatch in reference: fadump_setup_= param_area+0x200 (section: .text.fadump_setup_param_area) -> memblock_phys_= alloc_range (section: .init.text) =20 >=20 > I don't see the warning, but clearly it is possible if the compiler > decides not to inline fadump_setup_param_area(). >=20 > What compiler version are you using? $ gcc --version gcc (Debian 13.2.0-7) 13.2.0 (on zz1 if you want to test) --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell --Sig_/8=rEbHDsm_Vfaw.dcRcMzja Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAmZFjTwACgkQAVBC80lX 0Gz/qgf/UJFGAJa8YAH/RLjgrt44P6TQj7A0baJl0AhyJHCh4vSoeUKU76gt1a4y yLMDSLtS8ar9pHKQO1+HAVEaboun2nieyDDoM6qDeyw0Pywm58+r5XjeSxEGOEfb 5QPKnGihFEbxxoU2RQjIpT9A4Jk6X9P4gILdcy9EtFSvIK0OG6PgIIaisQCfUWnT fSjvKKSKcFsz/vRMIvr5rTPXgIUHSyMC93h1cSKv4izciaeGxvmup/iu8FPS7Txl MTUDFpDINHJOLG82u6CedDXuqlOcCBgtYXBvmCkIH/dEfGeVjevDwokpbrFjk3qC GGjpxOLqlbzxgqp9o2c7Qs4YG1F0/Q== =MM25 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/8=rEbHDsm_Vfaw.dcRcMzja--