linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] PCI/AER: Print error message as per the TODO
@ 2024-04-15 16:10 Abhinav Jain
  2024-04-15 16:19 ` Joe Perches
  2024-06-05 21:23 ` [PATCH v2] " Abhinav Jain
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Abhinav Jain @ 2024-04-15 16:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mahesh, oohall, bhelgaas, linuxppc-dev, linux-pci, linux-kernel
  Cc: javier.carrasco.cruz, Abhinav Jain, skhan

Add a pr_err() to print the add device error in find_device_iter()

Signed-off-by: Abhinav Jain <jain.abhinav177@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
index ac6293c24976..0e1ad2998116 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
@@ -885,7 +885,8 @@ static int find_device_iter(struct pci_dev *dev, void *data)
 		/* List this device */
 		if (add_error_device(e_info, dev)) {
 			/* We cannot handle more... Stop iteration */
-			/* TODO: Should print error message here? */
+			pr_err("find_device_iter: Cannot handle more devices.
+					Stopping iteration");
 			return 1;
 		}
 
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] PCI/AER: Print error message as per the TODO
  2024-04-15 16:10 [PATCH] PCI/AER: Print error message as per the TODO Abhinav Jain
@ 2024-04-15 16:19 ` Joe Perches
  2024-06-05 21:23 ` [PATCH v2] " Abhinav Jain
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Joe Perches @ 2024-04-15 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Abhinav Jain, mahesh, oohall, bhelgaas, linuxppc-dev, linux-pci,
	linux-kernel
  Cc: javier.carrasco.cruz, skhan

On Mon, 2024-04-15 at 16:10 +0000, Abhinav Jain wrote:
> Add a pr_err() to print the add device error in find_device_iter()
[]
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
[]
> @@ -885,7 +885,8 @@ static int find_device_iter(struct pci_dev *dev, void *data)
>  		/* List this device */
>  		if (add_error_device(e_info, dev)) {
>  			/* We cannot handle more... Stop iteration */
> -			/* TODO: Should print error message here? */
> +			pr_err("find_device_iter: Cannot handle more devices.
> +					Stopping iteration");

You are adding unnecessary whitespace after the period.
String concatenation keeps _all_ the whitespace.

The format is fine on a single line too.

Something like:

		pr_notice("%s: Cannot handle more devices - iteration stopped\n",
			  __func__);


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2] PCI/AER: Print error message as per the TODO
  2024-04-15 16:10 [PATCH] PCI/AER: Print error message as per the TODO Abhinav Jain
  2024-04-15 16:19 ` Joe Perches
@ 2024-06-05 21:23 ` Abhinav Jain
  2024-06-05 21:58   ` Bjorn Helgaas
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Abhinav Jain @ 2024-06-05 21:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jain.abhinav177
  Cc: javier.carrasco.cruz, linux-pci, mahesh, linux-kernel, oohall,
	skhan, bhelgaas, linuxppc-dev

Print the add device error in find_device_iter()

Signed-off-by: Abhinav Jain <jain.abhinav177@gmail.com>

PATCH v1 link : https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240415161055.8316-1-jain.abhinav177@gmail.com/

Changes since v1:
 - Replaced pr_err() with pr_notice()
 - Removed unncessary whitespaces
---
 drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
index 0e1ad2998116..8b820a74dd6b 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
@@ -885,8 +885,8 @@ static int find_device_iter(struct pci_dev *dev, void *data)
 		/* List this device */
 		if (add_error_device(e_info, dev)) {
 			/* We cannot handle more... Stop iteration */
-			pr_err("find_device_iter: Cannot handle more devices.
-					Stopping iteration");
+			pr_notice("%s: Cannot handle more devices - iteration stopped\n",
+					__func__);
 			return 1;
 		}
 
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] PCI/AER: Print error message as per the TODO
  2024-06-05 21:23 ` [PATCH v2] " Abhinav Jain
@ 2024-06-05 21:58   ` Bjorn Helgaas
  2024-06-05 23:11     ` Abhinav Jain
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Bjorn Helgaas @ 2024-06-05 21:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Abhinav Jain
  Cc: javier.carrasco.cruz, linux-pci, mahesh, linux-kernel, oohall,
	skhan, bhelgaas, linuxppc-dev

On Wed, Jun 05, 2024 at 09:23:44PM +0000, Abhinav Jain wrote:
> Print the add device error in find_device_iter()
> 
> Signed-off-by: Abhinav Jain <jain.abhinav177@gmail.com>
> 
> PATCH v1 link : https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240415161055.8316-1-jain.abhinav177@gmail.com/
> 
> Changes since v1:
>  - Replaced pr_err() with pr_notice()
>  - Removed unncessary whitespaces
> ---

Thanks for looking at this.

  - It doesn't apply to -rc1 (the TODO message is missing).  In PCI,
    we normally apply patches on topic branches based on -rc1.

  - The subject should be more specific so it makes sense all by
    itself, e.g., "Log note if we find too many devices with errors"

  - Add period at end of sentence in commit log.

  - Move historical notes (v1 URL, changes since v1) below the "---"
    line so they don't get included in the commit log.

  - __func__ is not relevant here -- that's generally a debugging
    thing.  We can find the function by searching for the message
    text.  In cases like this, I'd rather have something that helps
    identify a *device* that's related to the message, e.g., the
    pci_dev in this case.  So I'd suggest pci_err(dev, "...") here.

  - I'd keep pci_err() instead of switching to pr_notice().  If we get
    this message, we should re-think the way we collect this
    information, so I want to hear about it.

>  drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> index 0e1ad2998116..8b820a74dd6b 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> @@ -885,8 +885,8 @@ static int find_device_iter(struct pci_dev *dev, void *data)
>  		/* List this device */
>  		if (add_error_device(e_info, dev)) {
>  			/* We cannot handle more... Stop iteration */
> -			pr_err("find_device_iter: Cannot handle more devices.
> -					Stopping iteration");
> +			pr_notice("%s: Cannot handle more devices - iteration stopped\n",
> +					__func__);
>  			return 1;
>  		}
>  
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] PCI/AER: Print error message as per the TODO
  2024-06-05 21:58   ` Bjorn Helgaas
@ 2024-06-05 23:11     ` Abhinav Jain
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Abhinav Jain @ 2024-06-05 23:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: helgaas
  Cc: jain.abhinav177, javier.carrasco.cruz, linux-pci, linux-kernel,
	mahesh, oohall, skhan, bhelgaas, linuxppc-dev

On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 16:58:48 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> - It doesn't apply to -rc1 (the TODO message is missing).  In PCI,
>   we normally apply patches on topic branches based on -rc1.

Thank you for the detailed feedback. I was looking at mainline only.

> - The subject should be more specific so it makes sense all by
>   itself, e.g., "Log note if we find too many devices with errors"

> - Add period at end of sentence in commit log.
> - Move historical notes (v1 URL, changes since v1) below the "---"
>  line so they don't get included in the commit log.

I have included these changes to the v3. Please find it here: 
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240605230954.22911-1-jain.abhinav177@gmail.com/

> - __func__ is not relevant here -- that's generally a debugging
>   thing.  We can find the function by searching for the message
>   text.  In cases like this, I'd rather have something that helps
>   identify a *device* that's related to the message, e.g., the
>   pci_dev in this case.  So I'd suggest pci_err(dev, "...") here.

> - I'd keep pci_err() instead of switching to pr_notice().  If we get
>   this message, we should re-think the way we collect this
>   information, so I want to hear about it.

I understand, this helped me get a clear picture of what needs to be 
done. I have accordingly added two pci_err for the same. Please review.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-06-05 23:12 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-04-15 16:10 [PATCH] PCI/AER: Print error message as per the TODO Abhinav Jain
2024-04-15 16:19 ` Joe Perches
2024-06-05 21:23 ` [PATCH v2] " Abhinav Jain
2024-06-05 21:58   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-06-05 23:11     ` Abhinav Jain

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).