linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/5] powerpc/ftrace: Remove pointer to struct module from dyn_arch_ftrace
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 16:03:56 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240610160356.70e8f7ac@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50b038f167f3fb94ed6074e029b6794bbe6e83a2.1718008093.git.naveen@kernel.org>

On Mon, 10 Jun 2024 14:08:15 +0530
Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> wrote:

> Pointer to struct module is only relevant for ftrace records belonging
> to kernel modules. Having this field in dyn_arch_ftrace wastes memory
> for all ftrace records belonging to the kernel. Remove the same in
> favour of looking up the module from the ftrace record address, similar
> to other architectures.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/ftrace.h        |  1 -
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c       | 47 ++++++++++-----
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace_64_pg.c | 73 +++++++++++-------------
>  3 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ftrace.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ftrace.h
> index 107fc5a48456..201f9d15430a 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ftrace.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ftrace.h
> @@ -26,7 +26,6 @@ unsigned long prepare_ftrace_return(unsigned long parent, unsigned long ip,
>  struct module;
>  struct dyn_ftrace;
>  struct dyn_arch_ftrace {
> -	struct module *mod;
>  };

Nice. I always hated that extra field.


>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> index d8d6b4fd9a14..041be965485e 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> @@ -106,20 +106,36 @@ static unsigned long find_ftrace_tramp(unsigned long ip)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static struct module *ftrace_lookup_module(struct dyn_ftrace *rec)
> +{
> +	struct module *mod = NULL;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
> +	/*
> +	 * NOTE: __module_text_address() must be called with preemption
> +	 * disabled, but we can rely on ftrace_lock to ensure that 'mod'
> +	 * retains its validity throughout the remainder of this code.
> +	*/
> +	preempt_disable();
> +	mod = __module_text_address(rec->ip);
> +	preempt_enable();
> +
> +	if (!mod)
> +		pr_err("No module loaded at addr=%lx\n", rec->ip);
> +#endif
> +
> +	return mod;
> +}

It may look nicer to have:

#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
static struct module *ftrace_lookup_module(struct dyn_ftrace *rec)
{
	struct module *mod = NULL;

	/*
	 * NOTE: __module_text_address() must be called with preemption
	 * disabled, but we can rely on ftrace_lock to ensure that 'mod'
	 * retains its validity throughout the remainder of this code.
	*/
	preempt_disable();
	mod = __module_text_address(rec->ip);
	preempt_enable();

	if (!mod)
		pr_err("No module loaded at addr=%lx\n", rec->ip);

	return mod;
}
#else
static inline struct module *ftrace_lookup_module(struct dyn_ftrace *rec)
{
	return NULL;
}
#endif

> +
>  static int ftrace_get_call_inst(struct dyn_ftrace *rec, unsigned long addr, ppc_inst_t *call_inst)
>  {
>  	unsigned long ip = rec->ip;
>  	unsigned long stub;
> +	struct module *mod;
>  
>  	if (is_offset_in_branch_range(addr - ip)) {
>  		/* Within range */
>  		stub = addr;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
> -	} else if (rec->arch.mod) {
> -		/* Module code would be going to one of the module stubs */
> -		stub = (addr == (unsigned long)ftrace_caller ? rec->arch.mod->arch.tramp :
> -							       rec->arch.mod->arch.tramp_regs);
> -#endif
>  	} else if (core_kernel_text(ip)) {
>  		/* We would be branching to one of our ftrace stubs */
>  		stub = find_ftrace_tramp(ip);
> @@ -128,7 +144,16 @@ static int ftrace_get_call_inst(struct dyn_ftrace *rec, unsigned long addr, ppc_
>  			return -EINVAL;
>  		}
>  	} else {
> -		return -EINVAL;
> +		mod = ftrace_lookup_module(rec);
> +		if (mod) {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
> +			/* Module code would be going to one of the module stubs */
> +			stub = (addr == (unsigned long)ftrace_caller ? mod->arch.tramp :
> +								       mod->arch.tramp_regs);
> +#endif

You have CONFIG_MODULES here and in ftrace_lookup_module() above, which
would always return NULL. Could you combine the above to be done in
ftrace_lookup_module() so that there's no #ifdef CONFIG_MODULES here?


> +		} else {
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}
>  	}
>  
>  	*call_inst = ftrace_create_branch_inst(ip, stub, 1);
> @@ -256,14 +281,6 @@ int ftrace_init_nop(struct module *mod, struct dyn_ftrace *rec)
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> -	if (!core_kernel_text(ip)) {
> -		if (!mod) {
> -			pr_err("0x%lx: No module provided for non-kernel address\n", ip);
> -			return -EFAULT;
> -		}
> -		rec->arch.mod = mod;
> -	}
> -
>  	/* Nop-out the ftrace location */
>  	new = ppc_inst(PPC_RAW_NOP());
>  	addr = MCOUNT_ADDR;

-- Steve

  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-10 20:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-10  8:38 [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] powerpc/ftrace: Move ftrace sequence out of line Naveen N Rao
2024-06-10  8:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/5] powerpc/kprobes: Use ftrace to determine if a probe is at function entry Naveen N Rao
2024-06-10  8:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/5] powerpc/ftrace: Remove pointer to struct module from dyn_arch_ftrace Naveen N Rao
2024-06-10 20:03   ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2024-06-11 14:45     ` Naveen N Rao
2024-06-10  8:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] powerpc/ftrace: Unify 32-bit and 64-bit ftrace entry code Naveen N Rao
2024-06-10 20:06   ` Steven Rostedt
2024-06-11 14:47     ` Naveen N Rao
2024-06-11 15:14       ` Steven Rostedt
2024-06-10  8:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/5] kbuild: Add generic hook for architectures to use before the final vmlinux link Naveen N Rao
2024-06-10  9:14   ` Masahiro Yamada
2024-06-10 17:16     ` Naveen N Rao
2024-06-10 21:51       ` Masahiro Yamada
2024-06-11 17:35         ` Naveen N Rao
2024-06-12 10:52           ` Naveen N Rao
2024-06-10  8:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/5] powerpc64/ftrace: Move ftrace sequence out of line Naveen N Rao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240610160356.70e8f7ac@gandalf.local.home \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=naveen@kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).