linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@linux.dev>,
	Marc Hartmayer <mhartmay@linux.ibm.com>,
	kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] build: retain intermediate .aux.o targets
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 03:28:47 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240612082847.GG19790@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240612044234.212156-1-npiggin@gmail.com>

On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 02:42:32PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> arm, powerpc, riscv, build .aux.o targets with implicit pattern rules
> in dependency chains that cause them to be made as intermediate files,
> which get removed when make finishes. This results in unnecessary
> partial rebuilds. If make is run again, this time the .aux.o targets
> are not intermediate, possibly due to being made via different
> dependencies.
> 
> Adding .aux.o files to .PRECIOUS prevents them being removed and solves
> the rebuild problem.
> 
> s390x does not have the problem because .SECONDARY prevents dependancies
> from being built as intermediate. However the same change is made for
> s390x, for consistency.

This is exactly what .SECONDARY is for, as its documentation says,
even.  Wouldn't it be better to just add a .SECONDARY to the other
targets as well?


Segher

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-06-12  8:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-12  4:42 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] build: retain intermediate .aux.o targets Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-12  6:48 ` Marc Hartmayer
2024-06-12  7:16 ` Andrew Jones
2024-06-12  8:28 ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2024-06-14  0:43   ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-14  1:08     ` Segher Boessenkool
2024-06-14  8:38       ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-07-26  4:15         ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-07-26  9:05           ` Thomas Huth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240612082847.GG19790@gate.crashing.org \
    --to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=andrew.jones@linux.dev \
    --cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mhartmay@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).