From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@linux.dev>,
Marc Hartmayer <mhartmay@linux.ibm.com>,
kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] build: retain intermediate .aux.o targets
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 20:08:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240614010856.GK19790@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D1ZBO021MLHV.3C7E4V3WOHO8V@gmail.com>
On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 10:43:39AM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> On Wed Jun 12, 2024 at 6:28 PM AEST, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 02:42:32PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > > arm, powerpc, riscv, build .aux.o targets with implicit pattern rules
> > > in dependency chains that cause them to be made as intermediate files,
> > > which get removed when make finishes. This results in unnecessary
> > > partial rebuilds. If make is run again, this time the .aux.o targets
> > > are not intermediate, possibly due to being made via different
> > > dependencies.
> > >
> > > Adding .aux.o files to .PRECIOUS prevents them being removed and solves
> > > the rebuild problem.
> > >
> > > s390x does not have the problem because .SECONDARY prevents dependancies
> > > from being built as intermediate. However the same change is made for
> > > s390x, for consistency.
> >
> > This is exactly what .SECONDARY is for, as its documentation says,
> > even. Wouldn't it be better to just add a .SECONDARY to the other
> > targets as well?
>
> Yeah we were debating that and agreed .PRECIOUS may not be the
> cleanest fix but since we already use that it's okay for a
> minimal fix.
But why add it to s390x then? It is not a fix there at all!
Segher
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-14 1:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-12 4:42 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] build: retain intermediate .aux.o targets Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-12 6:48 ` Marc Hartmayer
2024-06-12 7:16 ` Andrew Jones
2024-06-12 8:28 ` Segher Boessenkool
2024-06-14 0:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-14 1:08 ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2024-06-14 8:38 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-07-26 4:15 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-07-26 9:05 ` Thomas Huth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240614010856.GK19790@gate.crashing.org \
--to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=andrew.jones@linux.dev \
--cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mhartmay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).