From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1455C27C79 for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 13:05:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=F6S8dK11; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4W2qrP3gjJz3g0R for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 23:05:57 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.vnet.ibm.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=F6S8dK11; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4W2qp746hLz3fsl for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 23:03:59 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0353726.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 45HCQpv6013610; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 13:03:48 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=F1aygYlyQ1AHK zAJrOBghvCQaOOlKlQz25eOCxkF8iE=; b=F6S8dK119w0tXQPKcWOfdMWy+m6eR G+lMHTYGWeiQNuYL4RKQPL9kIsVRo7PAmjcsIg75lylh+yS4DYq0xUiMhSXbYugm 9glKKHG3EXk3ClOS/t9v+nGQn7pz2NHSU84jrL6D7kUq7Sya0350GnxaVjr8nv9S 4OYWyqm0Ovs3a/EEtJOz+TSnfKOhKY5JRNBK/9FMyfCVzD4LSXV/Fk1Yrjs4ATxs gJqhZNscQ/6TUYXxH2QMkv4Sacbe993mwVXh5NEjBX6Ei/JKA5zWz5KDQMnv9O2r 2UDMHOC8Hr+c74Y7OWh6GbXcXE+y3bMmFmPNYEOwK0sf1/vslYSos1UKQ== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3ytjkbgg5y-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 17 Jun 2024 13:03:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from m0353726.ppops.net (m0353726.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.18.0.8/8.18.0.8) with ESMTP id 45HD3lHh003679; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 13:03:47 GMT Received: from ppma12.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (dc.9e.1632.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [50.22.158.220]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3ytjkbgg5w-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 17 Jun 2024 13:03:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pps.filterd (ppma12.dal12v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma12.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 45HD1O9Y006227; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 13:03:46 GMT Received: from smtprelay06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.230]) by ppma12.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3ysn9uah6b-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 17 Jun 2024 13:03:46 +0000 Received: from smtpav01.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav01.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.100]) by smtprelay06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 45HD3ets28377836 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 17 Jun 2024 13:03:42 GMT Received: from smtpav01.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8C2820040; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 13:03:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav01.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07FAF20043; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 13:03:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [9.43.120.218]) by smtpav01.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 13:03:37 +0000 (GMT) From: Athira Rajeev To: acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, adrian.hunter@intel.com, irogers@google.com, namhyung@kernel.org Subject: [PATCH V2 2/3] tools/perf: Use is_perf_pid_map_name helper function to check dso's of pattern /tmp/perf-%d.map Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 18:33:31 +0530 Message-Id: <20240617130332.13427-2-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.35.1 In-Reply-To: <20240617130332.13427-1-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20240617130332.13427-1-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: laypn9f-7IeJSlHckrkR3y0G-aqYNmih X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: LuLsZvnwnqoRUnOm5rBM_oHQIft6o9D9 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1039,Hydra:6.0.680,FMLib:17.12.28.16 definitions=2024-06-17_11,2024-06-17_01,2024-05-17_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxlogscore=999 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 clxscore=1015 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 priorityscore=1501 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2405170001 definitions=main-2406170100 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com, kjain@linux.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akanksha@linux.ibm.com, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, maddy@linux.ibm.com, disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" commit 80d496be89ed ("perf report: Add support for profiling JIT generated code") added support for profiling JIT generated code. This patch handles dso's of form "/tmp/perf-$PID.map". Some of the references doesn't check exactly for same pattern. some uses "if (!strncmp(dso_name, "/tmp/perf-", 10))". Fix this by using helper function is_perf_pid_map_name which looks for proper pattern of form: "/tmp/perf-$PID.map" for these checks. Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev --- tools/perf/util/dsos.c | 2 +- tools/perf/util/srcline.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/util/dsos.c b/tools/perf/util/dsos.c index ab3d0c01dd63..23cd02aa701d 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/dsos.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/dsos.c @@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ static void dso__set_basename(struct dso *dso) char *base, *lname; int tid; - if (sscanf(dso__long_name(dso), "/tmp/perf-%d.map", &tid) == 1) { + if (is_perf_pid_map_name(dso__long_name(dso))) { if (asprintf(&base, "[JIT] tid %d", tid) < 0) return; } else { diff --git a/tools/perf/util/srcline.c b/tools/perf/util/srcline.c index 9d670d8c1c08..51eb78993fe2 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/srcline.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/srcline.c @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ static const char *srcline_dso_name(struct dso *dso) if (dso_name[0] == '[') return NULL; - if (!strncmp(dso_name, "/tmp/perf-", 10)) + if (is_perf_pid_map_name(dso_name)) return NULL; return dso_name; -- 2.35.3