From: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
To: Anjali K <anjalik@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: naveen@kernel.org, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu,
gustavoars@kernel.org, npiggin@gmail.com, vishalc@linux.ibm.com,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/pseries: Whitelist dtl slub object for copying to userspace
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 11:59:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202406201158.346A2BE@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <499f5305-eb54-43a7-9864-d032f29c445d@linux.ibm.com>
On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 10:58:49PM +0530, Anjali K wrote:
> However given that:
> (i) The dtl buffer is read-only. The dtl trace is a set of metrics which
> are collected to be read by privileged users.
> (ii) Users usually reads all the dtl entries, not a subset.
> (iii) Read overflows are unlikely to expose anything useful to attackers
> since we are whitelisting the complete slub object and there are no
> contiguous memory locations which need to be hidden.
> Can we go ahead with the whitelisting using kmem_cache_create_usercopy()
> approach?
> Or are there other reasons to prefer the bounce buffer approach?
Yeah, based on this and what mpe said, I have no objection to just
allowing it in kmem_cache_create_usercopy(). I was mainly just curious
what the threat model was. :)
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-20 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-14 17:38 [PATCH] powerpc/pseries: Whitelist dtl slub object for copying to userspace Anjali K
2024-06-17 10:37 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2024-06-17 17:59 ` Kees Cook
2024-06-18 7:11 ` Michael Ellerman
2024-06-21 8:12 ` Anjali K
2024-06-21 11:38 ` Michael Ellerman
2024-06-20 17:28 ` Anjali K
2024-06-20 18:59 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2024-06-24 12:30 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202406201158.346A2BE@keescook \
--to=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=anjalik@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=naveen@kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=vishalc@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).