linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Rick P Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] mm/mprotect: Fix dax puds
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 14:17:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240807141703.d641001ee14177ccf80a31d8@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240807194812.819412-1-peterx@redhat.com>

On Wed,  7 Aug 2024 15:48:04 -0400 Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> wrote:

> 
> Dax supports pud pages for a while, but mprotect on puds was missing since
> the start.  This series tries to fix that by providing pud handling in
> mprotect().  The goal is to add more types of pud mappings like hugetlb or
> pfnmaps.  This series paves way for it by fixing known pud entries.
> 
> Considering nobody reported this until when I looked at those other types
> of pud mappings, I am thinking maybe it doesn't need to be a fix for stable
> and this may not need to be backported.  I would guess whoever cares about
> mprotect() won't care 1G dax puds yet, vice versa.  I hope fixing that in
> new kernels would be fine, but I'm open to suggestions.

Yes, I'm not sure this is a "fix" at all.  We're implementing something
which previously wasn't there.  Perhaps the entire series should be
called "mm: implement mprotect() for DAX PUDs"?



  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-08-07 21:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-07 19:48 [PATCH v4 0/7] mm/mprotect: Fix dax puds Peter Xu
2024-08-07 19:48 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] mm/dax: Dump start address in fault handler Peter Xu
2024-08-07 19:48 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] mm/mprotect: Push mmu notifier to PUDs Peter Xu
2024-08-08 15:33   ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-08 21:21     ` Peter Xu
2024-08-08 21:31       ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-08 21:47         ` Peter Xu
2024-08-08 22:45           ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-07 19:48 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] mm/powerpc: Add missing pud helpers Peter Xu
2024-08-07 19:48 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] mm/x86: Make pud_leaf() only care about PSE bit Peter Xu
2024-08-07 22:22   ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-08-08 14:54     ` Peter Xu
2024-08-09 12:08       ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-08-09 13:53         ` Peter Xu
2024-08-07 19:48 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] mm/x86: arch_check_zapped_pud() Peter Xu
2024-08-07 22:28   ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-08-08 15:49     ` Peter Xu
2024-08-08 20:45       ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-07 19:48 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] mm/x86: Add missing pud helpers Peter Xu
2024-08-07 22:37   ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-08-08 20:25     ` Peter Xu
2024-08-07 19:48 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] mm/mprotect: fix dax pud handlings Peter Xu
2024-08-07 21:17 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2024-08-07 21:34   ` [PATCH v4 0/7] mm/mprotect: Fix dax puds Peter Xu
2024-08-07 21:44     ` Andrew Morton
2024-08-08 14:34       ` Peter Xu
2024-08-07 21:23 ` Andrew Morton
2024-08-07 21:47   ` Peter Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240807141703.d641001ee14177ccf80a31d8@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=jthoughton@google.com \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).