From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EE91C52D7B for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2024 23:57:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=OlObxjtY; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Wk7bQ4dTvz2xpp; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 09:57:06 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=OlObxjtY; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=145.40.73.55; helo=sin.source.kernel.org; envelope-from=kuba@kernel.org; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from sin.source.kernel.org (sin.source.kernel.org [145.40.73.55]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Wk6Pp1glmz2xsN for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 09:03:42 +1000 (AEST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sin.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11284CE1870; Tue, 13 Aug 2024 23:03:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 801DBC4AF0C; Tue, 13 Aug 2024 23:03:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1723590219; bh=lp7uSJRiTTBHrLo/DVE+4oyUfn9+eFpgssiOiAeRz74=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=OlObxjtYKz5g50GL6TE5MQVvfbAGE4f2Yk7bubkJH+8i51mL+B78bBoLkQu1jMGEL R1OmAu6Kg5WDIpDcRHsV60/O8zn8mIfzN8994M17jBLMY2oYQVk8+ryNj5HQn1olNW nFcUZQkZZ+mWoSSfIA17i3ttkXjaQVKkIAxWfOgeVBJoko4rAhxJkDeflY80cdvvfu ZomQ0+SXA1XSg53e4ka+nvEYdkNeg3MmuJ2gQfh3v/9FU7wdzG/P1dStqfo3xafckF v+r//v3NpfLINC1unM9U0u+GH1d3wdfIQ9Bcn/AVNAu8su18LUa4QxsroyMipBrI1w 1T0wwGldtHHGA== Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 16:03:37 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Frank Li Cc: "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Christophe Leroy , netdev@vger.kernel.org (open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS), devicetree@vger.kernel.org (open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list), linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org (open list:FREESCALE SOC DRIVERS), linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated list:FREESCALE SOC DRIVERS), imx@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] dt-bindings: soc: fsl: cpm_qe: convert network.txt to yaml Message-ID: <20240813160337.638eee6f@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20240812165041.3815525-1-Frank.Li@nxp.com> References: <20240812165041.3815525-1-Frank.Li@nxp.com> X-Mailing-List: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , , List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 12:50:35 -0400 Frank Li wrote: > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl,cpm-enet.yaml > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl,cpm-mdio.yaml > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/fsl/cpm_qe/fsl,ucc-hdlc.yaml > delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/fsl/cpm_qe/network.txt Any preference who applies this? net or soc or Rob? No preference here, FWIW: Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski > Sorry, It is sent by accidently. it was already post at > https://lore.kernel.org/imx/20240809175113.3470393-1-Frank.Li@nxp.com/T/#u patchwork for one thing considers this a newer version of the previous posting. So hard to tell where any discussion is expected to happen.