From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 632E4C52D7C for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 15:15:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4WqRYj0Fc9z2ynf; Fri, 23 Aug 2024 01:14:01 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1724339641; cv=none; b=NYa7PImMBBTZZFR0nNQm5VpTJTGXbHC8J9vO9LPxz2Be1MWioPplYN5hsI6RM5SIgza5jHKmNTnEykzbeaBP4f+MTzXwkilxvae90a/jutVsopzxpsmZvp3bIVnSehfDBl/VJYRJLQJBf5ZumqPqtzkNg0lNgvm6T2Qmc7vxsLX6s9L8BZMe7uYrlLKe9qeNt8RoVnL2Sx42iTxWwcGLsIWfU42i5NAwORTxuuNIok1MK3qtJFcazc+0Kj9CN45JGzuO4mAZ32Xt9WMEQAHhzR5RMJeYriFXuDWy0q4ziG4ySQeywU7FnoWgRU6Jr9NIRGdkiDsmmRsXcahiWbml4g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1724339641; c=relaxed/relaxed; bh=0v2110ndxTNPQPfCkNdnXDwPtBR9iCN3D470MJVMX2Y=; h=Received:Received:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:X-Mailer: In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=NxywkdEvTdLMkzdmM6Z3KeolrPweTkz78EHgKjP2C1tGPisH/QVGC5Y9ehfgHpnAi4Oe18iEHNb+7JqGX1TG2/9nl4bYhDkgMWTsA9Hth6hmnG8xMIjVx2oT6OzitHD69gXfLxifsc5VTdfnhvLIoZOJFAPwTahUCKExEuqFsg+Ij6ZdVS0M/BI3P+SJujkf+pGTPAS+6UmSokTWqNgLqZ0EXrIVqTGdn4n8DETXunth7Fim3oUTQilCC5O6XoHc+GjHzUdHAMD7hoAzN2aNIhN9UUCKEiYwBazJazqGIb9iI2a8GJmfhSxEkjLA7/6OVI1zQ0MTA12T2hlZen+YqQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass (client-ip=217.140.110.172; helo=foss.arm.com; envelope-from=joey.gouly@arm.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=arm.com (client-ip=217.140.110.172; helo=foss.arm.com; envelope-from=joey.gouly@arm.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4WqRYh4Yhyz2yhg for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2024 01:14:00 +1000 (AEST) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C52391691; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 08:13:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e124191.cambridge.arm.com (e124191.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.197.45]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A68193F58B; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 08:13:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Joey Gouly To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: nd@arm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, aneesh.kumar@kernel.org, aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com, bp@alien8.de, broonie@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com, joey.gouly@arm.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, maz@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au, naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com, npiggin@gmail.com, oliver.upton@linux.dev, shuah@kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org, szabolcs.nagy@arm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, will@kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v5 29/30] kselftest/arm64: Add test case for POR_EL0 signal frame records Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 16:11:12 +0100 Message-Id: <20240822151113.1479789-30-joey.gouly@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20240822151113.1479789-1-joey.gouly@arm.com> References: <20240822151113.1479789-1-joey.gouly@arm.com> X-Mailing-List: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , , List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Ensure that we get signal context for POR_EL0 if and only if POE is present on the system. Copied from the TPIDR2 test. Signed-off-by: Joey Gouly Cc: Catalin Marinas Cc: Will Deacon Cc: Mark Brown Cc: Shuah Khan Reviewed-by: Mark Brown Acked-by: Shuah Khan --- .../testing/selftests/arm64/signal/.gitignore | 1 + .../arm64/signal/testcases/poe_siginfo.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 87 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/poe_siginfo.c diff --git tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/.gitignore tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/.gitignore index 1ce5b5eac386..b2f2bfd5c6aa 100644 --- tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/.gitignore +++ tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/.gitignore @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ mangle_* fake_sigreturn_* fpmr_* +poe_* sme_* ssve_* sve_* diff --git tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/poe_siginfo.c tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/poe_siginfo.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..36bd9940ee05 --- /dev/null +++ tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/poe_siginfo.c @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * Copyright (C) 2023 Arm Limited + * + * Verify that the POR_EL0 register context in signal frames is set up as + * expected. + */ + +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include + +#include "test_signals_utils.h" +#include "testcases.h" + +static union { + ucontext_t uc; + char buf[1024 * 128]; +} context; + +#define SYS_POR_EL0 "S3_3_C10_C2_4" + +static uint64_t get_por_el0(void) +{ + uint64_t val; + + asm volatile( + "mrs %0, " SYS_POR_EL0 "\n" + : "=r"(val) + : + : ); + + return val; +} + +int poe_present(struct tdescr *td, siginfo_t *si, ucontext_t *uc) +{ + struct _aarch64_ctx *head = GET_BUF_RESV_HEAD(context); + struct poe_context *poe_ctx; + size_t offset; + bool in_sigframe; + bool have_poe; + __u64 orig_poe; + + have_poe = getauxval(AT_HWCAP2) & HWCAP2_POE; + if (have_poe) + orig_poe = get_por_el0(); + + if (!get_current_context(td, &context.uc, sizeof(context))) + return 1; + + poe_ctx = (struct poe_context *) + get_header(head, POE_MAGIC, td->live_sz, &offset); + + in_sigframe = poe_ctx != NULL; + + fprintf(stderr, "POR_EL0 sigframe %s on system %s POE\n", + in_sigframe ? "present" : "absent", + have_poe ? "with" : "without"); + + td->pass = (in_sigframe == have_poe); + + /* + * Check that the value we read back was the one present at + * the time that the signal was triggered. + */ + if (have_poe && poe_ctx) { + if (poe_ctx->por_el0 != orig_poe) { + fprintf(stderr, "POR_EL0 in frame is %llx, was %llx\n", + poe_ctx->por_el0, orig_poe); + td->pass = false; + } + } + + return 0; +} + +struct tdescr tde = { + .name = "POR_EL0", + .descr = "Validate that POR_EL0 is present as expected", + .timeout = 3, + .run = poe_present, +}; -- 2.25.1