From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8726CD343E for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2024 14:51:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4WypV96J6cz2y83; Wed, 4 Sep 2024 00:51:29 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1725375089; cv=none; b=fzoCH7zccz8umneiUBFUpNyuDApfC6yqOKlHus0K4E2p3D5n4Np/4tuAX4qxtJfszE2tlkvo9KXGQt197NaYfOAtINfePyYWBecnx8eVcor/bDV+09D1l7blcoKOHYtgxgxBUSYZvjdMW0N0/rjEbzjmPNeXo+JF1+fZ4cUJtci1dHgZ7FFjLGdWzR0kB7AkNUxcC/spp1tpYvti2sgxXWzh594bFElS0UBI1tn79mG1FhsVTmoou/1IePR89a1BSBkKyopWgxbRdknkJDRGTsZPffmKUDDDKdTKuQp9l+Yfm6F7azy94pbp08QFYT9IVk2ISxwrtk4yLdxrK351Rw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1725375089; c=relaxed/relaxed; bh=bDqnEweAQ91ZaX2BP7Rb9KWNWhs+lCN9D8yckPy3xkQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=HGWXnwW5y/M9TuLgsYzCeUlDmAQiRIby8w5vEEwJ2X5Um67q9lmMLR6V5Lt9asIA5YMvzWquUsbPaU+o8psss6NVFg56hTiUq5zmC4RYhmGOTKB/VroMJeZRjXxxqM29gXerWNojQo7p/2DVAX3W4dEqfUV/aMbtqSOpPXVXjjCJT4fLdJkdaSTn3qRJhTZyHtOg+84AGgtmWWVGgOqHTlIwXLRs4Tgxd4PmxyjNGr5sjA6h0GDhHMwU7ytLPS5GGaOOerQwZCAydR+0wxJCPbsXcx/DA+cgfw/COcKEE0e/R+Gyo7yAN9eK+l8PcowuGeBnofE7Y1W3bpbDKeImuQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass (client-ip=217.140.110.172; helo=foss.arm.com; envelope-from=joey.gouly@arm.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=arm.com (client-ip=217.140.110.172; helo=foss.arm.com; envelope-from=joey.gouly@arm.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4WypV91ybpz2y3Z for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2024 00:51:27 +1000 (AEST) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16944FEC; Tue, 3 Sep 2024 07:51:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e124191.cambridge.arm.com (e124191.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.197.45]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 54B823F66E; Tue, 3 Sep 2024 07:50:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 15:50:46 +0100 From: Joey Gouly To: Mark Brown Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, nd@arm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, aneesh.kumar@kernel.org, aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com, bp@alien8.de, catalin.marinas@arm.com, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, maz@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au, naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com, npiggin@gmail.com, oliver.upton@linux.dev, shuah@kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org, szabolcs.nagy@arm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, will@kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 16/30] arm64: handle PKEY/POE faults Message-ID: <20240903144823.GA3669886@e124191.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20240822151113.1479789-1-joey.gouly@arm.com> <20240822151113.1479789-17-joey.gouly@arm.com> <40600b75-68eb-421a-a122-256bd20afb89@sirena.org.uk> X-Mailing-List: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , , List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40600b75-68eb-421a-a122-256bd20afb89@sirena.org.uk> On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 06:55:07PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 04:10:59PM +0100, Joey Gouly wrote: > > > +static bool fault_from_pkey(unsigned long esr, struct vm_area_struct *vma, > > + unsigned int mm_flags) > > +{ > > + unsigned long iss2 = ESR_ELx_ISS2(esr); > > + > > + if (!system_supports_poe()) > > + return false; > > + > > + if (iss2 & ESR_ELx_Overlay) > > + return true; > > Does this need an is_data_abort() && is_instruction_abort() check? > Overlay doesn't appear to be defined for all exception types and it > wasn't clear enough to me that the callers have done this check. The only callers are in do_page_fault(), which should only be data or instruction aborts. I talked with Catalin and he said it's fine to not check again here. I can add a permissions check though: commit 033270f5a9462e998b4dee11fc91b43ac7929756 Author: Joey Gouly Date: Tue Sep 3 15:45:59 2024 +0100 fixup! arm64: handle PKEY/POE faults diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c index a68055150950..f651553a8ab8 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c @@ -495,6 +495,9 @@ static bool fault_from_pkey(unsigned long esr, struct vm_area_struct *vma, if (!system_supports_poe()) return false; + if (!esr_fsc_is_permission_fault(esr)) + return false; + if (iss2 & ESR_ELx_Overlay) return true; Since the ESR_EL1 documentation says: If a memory access generates a Data Abort for a Permission fault, then this field holds information about the fault. Thanks, Joey