From: Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 5/5] perf: Correct perf sampling with guest VMs
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 17:47:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240920174740.781614-6-coltonlewis@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240920174740.781614-1-coltonlewis@google.com>
Previously any PMU overflow interrupt that fired while a VCPU was
loaded was recorded as a guest event whether it truly was or not. This
resulted in nonsense perf recordings that did not honor
perf_event_attr.exclude_guest and recorded guest IPs where it should
have recorded host IPs.
Rework the sampling logic to only record guest samples for events with
exclude_guest = 0. This way any host-only events with exclude_guest
set will never see unexpected guest samples. The behaviour of events
with exclude_guest = 0 is unchanged.
Note that events configured to sample both host and guest may still
misattribute a PMI that arrived in the host as a guest event depending
on KVM arch and vendor behavior.
Signed-off-by: Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/perf_event.h | 4 ----
arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c | 28 ----------------------------
arch/x86/events/core.c | 16 ++++------------
include/linux/perf_event.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
kernel/events/core.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++----
5 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/perf_event.h
index 31a5584ed423..ee45b4e77347 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/perf_event.h
@@ -10,10 +10,6 @@
#include <asm/ptrace.h>
#ifdef CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS
-struct pt_regs;
-extern unsigned long perf_arch_instruction_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs);
-extern unsigned long perf_arch_misc_flags(struct pt_regs *regs);
-#define perf_arch_misc_flags(regs) perf_misc_flags(regs)
#define perf_arch_bpf_user_pt_regs(regs) ®s->user_regs
#endif
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c
index 01a9d08fc009..9b7f26b128b5 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c
@@ -38,31 +38,3 @@ void perf_callchain_kernel(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry,
arch_stack_walk(callchain_trace, entry, current, regs);
}
-
-unsigned long perf_arch_instruction_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs)
-{
- if (perf_guest_state())
- return perf_guest_get_ip();
-
- return instruction_pointer(regs);
-}
-
-unsigned long perf_arch_misc_flags(struct pt_regs *regs)
-{
- unsigned int guest_state = perf_guest_state();
- int misc = 0;
-
- if (guest_state) {
- if (guest_state & PERF_GUEST_USER)
- misc |= PERF_RECORD_MISC_GUEST_USER;
- else
- misc |= PERF_RECORD_MISC_GUEST_KERNEL;
- } else {
- if (user_mode(regs))
- misc |= PERF_RECORD_MISC_USER;
- else
- misc |= PERF_RECORD_MISC_KERNEL;
- }
-
- return misc;
-}
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
index d51e5d24802b..3c5f512d2bcf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
@@ -2942,9 +2942,6 @@ static unsigned long code_segment_base(struct pt_regs *regs)
unsigned long perf_arch_instruction_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
- if (perf_guest_state())
- return perf_guest_get_ip();
-
return regs->ip + code_segment_base(regs);
}
@@ -2971,17 +2968,12 @@ unsigned long perf_arch_guest_misc_flags(struct pt_regs *regs)
unsigned long perf_arch_misc_flags(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
- unsigned int guest_state = perf_guest_state();
unsigned long misc = common_misc_flags(regs);
- if (guest_state) {
- misc |= perf_arch_guest_misc_flags(regs);
- } else {
- if (user_mode(regs))
- misc |= PERF_RECORD_MISC_USER;
- else
- misc |= PERF_RECORD_MISC_KERNEL;
- }
+ if (user_mode(regs))
+ misc |= PERF_RECORD_MISC_USER;
+ else
+ misc |= PERF_RECORD_MISC_KERNEL;
return misc;
}
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index d061e327ad54..968f3edd95e4 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -1633,8 +1633,9 @@ extern void perf_tp_event(u16 event_type, u64 count, void *record,
struct task_struct *task);
extern void perf_bp_event(struct perf_event *event, void *data);
-extern unsigned long perf_misc_flags(struct pt_regs *regs);
-extern unsigned long perf_instruction_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs);
+extern unsigned long perf_misc_flags(struct perf_event *event, struct pt_regs *regs);
+extern unsigned long perf_instruction_pointer(struct perf_event *event,
+ struct pt_regs *regs);
#ifndef perf_arch_misc_flags
# define perf_arch_misc_flags(regs) \
@@ -1645,6 +1646,22 @@ extern unsigned long perf_instruction_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs);
# define perf_arch_bpf_user_pt_regs(regs) regs
#endif
+#ifndef perf_arch_guest_misc_flags
+static inline unsigned long perf_arch_guest_misc_flags(struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+ unsigned long guest_state = perf_guest_state();
+
+ if (guest_state & PERF_GUEST_USER)
+ return PERF_RECORD_MISC_GUEST_USER;
+
+ if (guest_state & PERF_GUEST_ACTIVE)
+ return PERF_RECORD_MISC_GUEST_KERNEL;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+# define perf_arch_guest_misc_flags(regs) perf_arch_guest_misc_flags(regs)
+#endif
+
static inline bool has_branch_stack(struct perf_event *event)
{
return event->attr.sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK;
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index eeabbf791a8c..c5e57c024d9a 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -6921,13 +6921,26 @@ void perf_unregister_guest_info_callbacks(struct perf_guest_info_callbacks *cbs)
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_unregister_guest_info_callbacks);
#endif
-unsigned long perf_misc_flags(struct pt_regs *regs)
+static bool should_sample_guest(struct perf_event *event)
{
+ return !event->attr.exclude_guest && perf_guest_state();
+}
+
+unsigned long perf_misc_flags(struct perf_event *event,
+ struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+ if (should_sample_guest(event))
+ return perf_arch_guest_misc_flags(regs);
+
return perf_arch_misc_flags(regs);
}
-unsigned long perf_instruction_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs)
+unsigned long perf_instruction_pointer(struct perf_event *event,
+ struct pt_regs *regs)
{
+ if (should_sample_guest(event))
+ return perf_guest_get_ip();
+
return perf_arch_instruction_pointer(regs);
}
@@ -7743,7 +7756,7 @@ void perf_prepare_sample(struct perf_sample_data *data,
__perf_event_header__init_id(data, event, filtered_sample_type);
if (filtered_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_IP) {
- data->ip = perf_instruction_pointer(regs);
+ data->ip = perf_instruction_pointer(event, regs);
data->sample_flags |= PERF_SAMPLE_IP;
}
@@ -7907,7 +7920,7 @@ void perf_prepare_header(struct perf_event_header *header,
{
header->type = PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE;
header->size = perf_sample_data_size(data, event);
- header->misc = perf_misc_flags(regs);
+ header->misc = perf_misc_flags(event, regs);
/*
* If you're adding more sample types here, you likely need to do
--
2.46.0.792.g87dc391469-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-20 17:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-20 17:47 [PATCH v5 0/5] Correct perf sampling with Guest VMs Colton Lewis
2024-09-20 17:47 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] arm: perf: Drop unused functions Colton Lewis
2024-10-04 15:14 ` Mark Rutland
2024-09-20 17:47 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] perf: Hoist perf_instruction_pointer() and perf_misc_flags() Colton Lewis
2024-09-23 8:35 ` Thomas Richter
2024-09-23 19:05 ` Colton Lewis
2024-10-04 15:16 ` Mark Rutland
2024-10-14 15:43 ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2024-09-20 17:47 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] powerpc: perf: Use perf_arch_instruction_pointer() Colton Lewis
2024-10-14 15:46 ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2024-09-20 17:47 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] x86: perf: Refactor misc flag assignments Colton Lewis
2024-09-20 17:47 ` Colton Lewis [this message]
2024-10-04 15:31 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] perf: Correct perf sampling with guest VMs Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240920174740.781614-6-coltonlewis@google.com \
--to=coltonlewis@google.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=naveen@kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).