linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	 Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	 Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org>,
	Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
	 Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	 Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
	Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
	 Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,  llvm@lists.linux.dev,
	patches@lists.linux.dev, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	 Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] powerpc: Fix stack protector Kconfig test for clang
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2024 12:26:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241009-powerpc-fix-stackprotector-test-clang-v2-1-12fb86b31857@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241009-powerpc-fix-stackprotector-test-clang-v2-0-12fb86b31857@kernel.org>

Clang's in-progress per-task stack protector support [1] does not work
with the current Kconfig checks because '-mstack-protector-guard-offset'
is not provided, unlike all other architecture Kconfig checks.

  $ fd Kconfig -x rg -l mstack-protector-guard-offset
  ./arch/arm/Kconfig
  ./arch/riscv/Kconfig
  ./arch/arm64/Kconfig

This produces an error from clang, which is interpreted as the flags not
being supported at all when they really are.

  $ clang --target=powerpc64-linux-gnu \
          -mstack-protector-guard=tls \
          -mstack-protector-guard-reg=r13 \
          -c -o /dev/null -x c /dev/null
  clang: error: '-mstack-protector-guard=tls' is used without '-mstack-protector-guard-offset', and there is no default

This argument will always be provided by the build system, so mirror
other architectures and use '-mstack-protector-guard-offset=0' for
testing support, which fixes the issue for clang and does not regress
support with GCC.

Even with the first problem addressed, the 32-bit test continues to fail
because Kbuild uses the powerpc64le-linux-gnu target for clang and
nothing flips the target to 32-bit, resulting in an error about an
invalid register valid:

  $ clang --target=powerpc64le-linux-gnu \
          -mstack-protector-guard=tls
          -mstack-protector-guard-reg=r2 \
          -mstack-protector-guard-offset=0 \
          -x c -c -o /dev/null /dev/null
  clang: error: invalid value 'r2' in 'mstack-protector-guard-reg=', expected one of: r13

While GCC allows arbitrary registers, the implementation of
'-mstack-protector-guard=tls' in LLVM shares the same code path as the
user space thread local storage implementation, which uses a fixed
register (2 for 32-bit and 13 for 62-bit), so the command line parsing
enforces this limitation.

Use the Kconfig macro '$(m32-flag)', which expands to '-m32' when
supported, in the stack protector support cc-option call to properly
switch the target to a 32-bit one, which matches what happens in Kbuild.
While the 64-bit macro does not strictly need it, add the equivalent
64-bit option for symmetry.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Link: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110928 [1]
Reviewed-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Tested-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
---
 arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
index 8094a01974cca1d27002720e706f66bec2a2d035..6aaca48955a34b2a38af1415bfa36f74f35c3f3e 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
@@ -275,8 +275,8 @@ config PPC
 	select HAVE_RSEQ
 	select HAVE_SETUP_PER_CPU_AREA		if PPC64
 	select HAVE_SOFTIRQ_ON_OWN_STACK
-	select HAVE_STACKPROTECTOR		if PPC32 && $(cc-option,-mstack-protector-guard=tls -mstack-protector-guard-reg=r2)
-	select HAVE_STACKPROTECTOR		if PPC64 && $(cc-option,-mstack-protector-guard=tls -mstack-protector-guard-reg=r13)
+	select HAVE_STACKPROTECTOR		if PPC32 && $(cc-option,$(m32-flag) -mstack-protector-guard=tls -mstack-protector-guard-reg=r2 -mstack-protector-guard-offset=0)
+	select HAVE_STACKPROTECTOR		if PPC64 && $(cc-option,$(m64-flag) -mstack-protector-guard=tls -mstack-protector-guard-reg=r13 -mstack-protector-guard-offset=0)
 	select HAVE_STATIC_CALL			if PPC32
 	select HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS
 	select HAVE_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING

-- 
2.47.0



  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-09 19:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-09 19:26 [PATCH v2 0/2] powerpc: Prepare for clang's per-task stack protector support Nathan Chancellor
2024-10-09 19:26 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2024-10-09 19:26 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] powerpc: Adjust adding stack protector flags to KBUILD_CLAGS for clang Nathan Chancellor
2024-11-07  8:42 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] powerpc: Prepare for clang's per-task stack protector support Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241009-powerpc-fix-stackprotector-test-clang-v2-1-12fb86b31857@kernel.org \
    --to=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=justinstitt@google.com \
    --cc=keithp@keithp.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=morbo@google.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=naveen@kernel.org \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).