From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D37AD24461 for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2024 00:00:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4XPmx46vSCz3bl6; Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:00:56 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=198.175.65.11 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1728604856; cv=none; b=HrHVmhGlQ4SYYKJW4JA9oZhNyYAYVPzb3YY/sS834Vv3Velydc6Mm/UBG9+7gpND5rdnzTZfENAtjJgy/KdsfsiiPk7u81+XVYIeuqwdHU7s5zif1edU3EL18AjD/TL8Hvekrn4lsJeOLWYU28MKDnymLlHtjbzj3l9YGLI6PVKa//+y+TP4UZpGmjK8TSC9ASqWNrraxxwkYqy2agm8N87vap5GV+Zl7aq96hG/248ctNkwvmXoHr9fOSDU3/tyvmEkHTQovYmlmKlP+GHVqFjcSgHJHbY570toXeJqDZVjnB2dR2RZPA5Heqwnz016SijHMmGDOC7ziXQUzT89tQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1728604856; c=relaxed/relaxed; bh=XrGIk3/hPYl80fy4szU+TX8M/v3wNYBB9h7PJF0hL3g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=jehBzgzlaGKlyatQkGE5fhP4IRIHeEcy1RUcOhq20DofpUQkqTfpsCblOEN2QLurB+tniiUwTChuGnCPGvg4RNE2QkYI2TLFUM8EBfRlm3GAWvLiYl1nMbf0Z1aKIgldFiMNTLDmOiMmUlZZNmsgSEhzqDk7LVqVUAkXyJXP0xWUbbbEMay8q4CgmKaU5YanutVk8nvxgMr0AS7euE6fHvRKxhnmti1ScgMy2QycliQdYobvA36dt6ws5cP1LvUTkKglb9ddaARALR6Dm7ClJfLDoOpz0IMNMVQAi/VizpvKpkox/7frjzDYzyPMtNEq6+33jaOmdM12Y3kCt+EgCA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=Intel header.b=f9AgEen6; dkim-atps=neutral; spf=pass (client-ip=198.175.65.11; helo=mgamail.intel.com; envelope-from=lkp@intel.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=Intel header.b=f9AgEen6; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=intel.com (client-ip=198.175.65.11; helo=mgamail.intel.com; envelope-from=lkp@intel.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XPmx06N9vz2xHr for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:00:50 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1728604853; x=1760140853; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=/tGy3oUCpao5XYIAYrwRJW9zQx6klW4scJvsxIw2Ehg=; b=f9AgEen6UKQaaAYa/6URUV0f9qgnNRLO9IvBVYduzXIgYYtSV0XWQe2J 1/tyN4saMfoGT48m7JNomNFy8HaA3kGLc+itE50kYJv5/r9s9odjPuTcI nfmgT4opNRIWFyEuUKUcjjeFIKRLrMF+iIrTUxt+Ff44WNAZ3jj3bFep0 HQs0UXx0PevnRO4f86LGbzptFgS9+Ocs4w+bbvXj0UFQzfR0MYx5WN7MD zPTRi4+riuHxce6c77Dd7IHK/QeIUcz7vVXDMvTjkwY4eYnL8RoUhDgFT sH983zTyZcrqezAm5+lxzTSHKPxUoveSB49UN7fxqVnXtBJLKHpMvtSMp w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: vQPftKPgRg2bEnUQ6RPvgg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: eWZVf1ZxSdWFxKWQV+C2fQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11221"; a="38564890" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,194,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="38564890" Received: from orviesa003.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.143]) by orvoesa103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Oct 2024 17:00:47 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: ucytdMfNSbWmqYgF79tL9A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 0+0WgprTTtaQNoh/GWyZ1A== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,194,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="81568298" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO a48cf1aa22e8) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Oct 2024 17:00:40 -0700 Received: from kbuild by a48cf1aa22e8 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1sz35B-000BR5-1w; Fri, 11 Oct 2024 00:00:37 +0000 Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 08:00:21 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Steven Rostedt , LKML , Linux Trace Kernel , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" , "x86@kernel.org" Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Masami Hiramatsu , Mathieu Desnoyers , Mark Rutland , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Huacai Chen , WANG Xuerui , Michael Ellerman , Nicholas Piggin , Christophe Leroy , Naveen N Rao , Madhavan Srinivasan , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Heiko Carstens , Vasily Gorbik , Alexander Gordeev , Christian Borntraeger , Sven Schnelle , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH] ftrace: Make ftrace_regs abstract from direct use Message-ID: <202410110707.uHvgl9S7-lkp@intel.com> References: <20241007204743.41314f1d@gandalf.local.home> X-Mailing-List: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , , List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241007204743.41314f1d@gandalf.local.home> Hi Steven, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on next-20241004] [cannot apply to s390/features arm64/for-next/core powerpc/next powerpc/fixes linus/master v6.12-rc2 v6.12-rc1 v6.11 v6.12-rc2] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Steven-Rostedt/ftrace-Make-ftrace_regs-abstract-from-direct-use/20241008-084930 base: next-20241004 patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241007204743.41314f1d%40gandalf.local.home patch subject: [PATCH] ftrace: Make ftrace_regs abstract from direct use config: um-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241011/202410110707.uHvgl9S7-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 17.0.6 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 6009708b4367171ccdbf4b5905cb6a803753fe18) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241011/202410110707.uHvgl9S7-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410110707.uHvgl9S7-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from kernel/time/time.c:31: In file included from include/linux/timekeeper_internal.h:10: In file included from include/linux/clocksource.h:22: In file included from arch/um/include/asm/io.h:24: include/asm-generic/io.h:548:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 548 | val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:561:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 561 | val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr)); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:37:51: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu' 37 | #define __le16_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u16)(__le16)(x)) | ^ In file included from kernel/time/time.c:31: In file included from include/linux/timekeeper_internal.h:10: In file included from include/linux/clocksource.h:22: In file included from arch/um/include/asm/io.h:24: include/asm-generic/io.h:574:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 574 | val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr)); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:35:51: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu' 35 | #define __le32_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u32)(__le32)(x)) | ^ In file included from kernel/time/time.c:31: In file included from include/linux/timekeeper_internal.h:10: In file included from include/linux/clocksource.h:22: In file included from arch/um/include/asm/io.h:24: include/asm-generic/io.h:585:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 585 | __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:595:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 595 | __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:605:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 605 | __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:693:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 693 | readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:701:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 701 | readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:709:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 709 | readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:718:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 718 | writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:727:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 727 | writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:736:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 736 | writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ In file included from kernel/time/time.c:33: In file included from include/linux/syscalls.h:93: In file included from include/trace/syscall.h:7: In file included from include/linux/trace_events.h:10: In file included from include/linux/perf_event.h:52: In file included from include/linux/ftrace.h:23: In file included from ./arch/um/include/generated/asm/ftrace.h:1: >> include/asm-generic/ftrace.h:5:2: error: unterminated conditional directive 5 | #ifndef __ASM_GENERIC_FTRACE_H__ | ^ 12 warnings and 1 error generated. -- In file included from kernel/time/hrtimer.c:30: In file included from include/linux/syscalls.h:93: In file included from include/trace/syscall.h:7: In file included from include/linux/trace_events.h:9: In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11: In file included from arch/um/include/asm/hardirq.h:5: In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17: In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20: In file included from include/linux/io.h:14: In file included from arch/um/include/asm/io.h:24: include/asm-generic/io.h:548:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 548 | val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:561:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 561 | val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr)); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:37:51: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu' 37 | #define __le16_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u16)(__le16)(x)) | ^ In file included from kernel/time/hrtimer.c:30: In file included from include/linux/syscalls.h:93: In file included from include/trace/syscall.h:7: In file included from include/linux/trace_events.h:9: In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11: In file included from arch/um/include/asm/hardirq.h:5: In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17: In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20: In file included from include/linux/io.h:14: In file included from arch/um/include/asm/io.h:24: include/asm-generic/io.h:574:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 574 | val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr)); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:35:51: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu' 35 | #define __le32_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u32)(__le32)(x)) | ^ In file included from kernel/time/hrtimer.c:30: In file included from include/linux/syscalls.h:93: In file included from include/trace/syscall.h:7: In file included from include/linux/trace_events.h:9: In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11: In file included from arch/um/include/asm/hardirq.h:5: In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17: In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20: In file included from include/linux/io.h:14: In file included from arch/um/include/asm/io.h:24: include/asm-generic/io.h:585:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 585 | __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:595:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 595 | __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:605:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 605 | __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:693:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 693 | readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:701:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 701 | readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:709:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 709 | readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:718:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 718 | writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:727:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 727 | writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:736:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 736 | writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ In file included from kernel/time/hrtimer.c:30: In file included from include/linux/syscalls.h:93: In file included from include/trace/syscall.h:7: In file included from include/linux/trace_events.h:10: In file included from include/linux/perf_event.h:52: In file included from include/linux/ftrace.h:23: In file included from ./arch/um/include/generated/asm/ftrace.h:1: >> include/asm-generic/ftrace.h:5:2: error: unterminated conditional directive 5 | #ifndef __ASM_GENERIC_FTRACE_H__ | ^ kernel/time/hrtimer.c:121:21: warning: initializer overrides prior initialization of this subobject [-Winitializer-overrides] 121 | [CLOCK_REALTIME] = HRTIMER_BASE_REALTIME, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/time/hrtimer.c:119:27: note: previous initialization is here 119 | [0 ... MAX_CLOCKS - 1] = HRTIMER_MAX_CLOCK_BASES, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/time/hrtimer.c:122:22: warning: initializer overrides prior initialization of this subobject [-Winitializer-overrides] 122 | [CLOCK_MONOTONIC] = HRTIMER_BASE_MONOTONIC, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/time/hrtimer.c:119:27: note: previous initialization is here 119 | [0 ... MAX_CLOCKS - 1] = HRTIMER_MAX_CLOCK_BASES, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/time/hrtimer.c:123:21: warning: initializer overrides prior initialization of this subobject [-Winitializer-overrides] 123 | [CLOCK_BOOTTIME] = HRTIMER_BASE_BOOTTIME, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/time/hrtimer.c:119:27: note: previous initialization is here 119 | [0 ... MAX_CLOCKS - 1] = HRTIMER_MAX_CLOCK_BASES, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/time/hrtimer.c:124:17: warning: initializer overrides prior initialization of this subobject [-Winitializer-overrides] 124 | [CLOCK_TAI] = HRTIMER_BASE_TAI, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/time/hrtimer.c:119:27: note: previous initialization is here 119 | [0 ... MAX_CLOCKS - 1] = HRTIMER_MAX_CLOCK_BASES, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 16 warnings and 1 error generated. vim +5 include/asm-generic/ftrace.h 38f5bf84bd588a GuanXuetao 2011-01-15 @5 #ifndef __ASM_GENERIC_FTRACE_H__ 38f5bf84bd588a GuanXuetao 2011-01-15 6 #define __ASM_GENERIC_FTRACE_H__ 38f5bf84bd588a GuanXuetao 2011-01-15 7 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki