Re: [PATCH] tools/perf/tests/expr: Make the system_tsc_freq test only for intel

[Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>]

Hi Athira,

On Wed, Nov 06, 2024 at 03:04:57PM +0530, Athira Rajeev wrote:

[...]

> > Hi Athira,
> >
> > sorry for the breakage and thank you for the detailed explanation. As
> > the code will run on AMD I think your change will break that - . It is
> > probably safest to keep the ".. else { .." for this case but guard it
> > in the ifdef.
> >
> 
> Hi Ian
> 
> Thanks for your comments. Does the below change looks good ?
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/expr.c b/tools/perf/tests/expr.c
> index e3aa9d4fcf3a..f5b2d96bb59b 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/expr.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/expr.c
> @@ -74,14 +74,12 @@ static int test__expr(struct test_suite *t __maybe_unused, int subtest __maybe_u
>     double val, num_cpus_online, num_cpus, num_cores, num_dies, num_packages;
>     int ret;
>     struct expr_parse_ctx *ctx;
> -    bool is_intel = false;
>     char strcmp_cpuid_buf[256];
>     struct perf_pmu *pmu = perf_pmus__find_core_pmu();
>     char *cpuid = perf_pmu__getcpuid(pmu);
>     char *escaped_cpuid1, *escaped_cpuid2;
> 
>     TEST_ASSERT_VAL("get_cpuid", cpuid);
> -    is_intel = strstr(cpuid, "Intel") != NULL;
> 
>     TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL("ids_union", test_ids_union(), 0);
> 
> @@ -244,11 +242,13 @@ static int test__expr(struct test_suite *t __maybe_unused, int subtest __maybe_u
>     if (num_dies) // Some platforms do not have CPU die support, for example s390
>         TEST_ASSERT_VAL("#num_dies >= #num_packages", num_dies >= num_packages);
> 
> +#if defined(__i386__) && defined(__x86_64__)
>     TEST_ASSERT_VAL("#system_tsc_freq", expr__parse(&val, ctx, "#system_tsc_freq") == 0);
> -    if (is_intel)
> +    if (strstr(cpuid, "Intel") != NULL)
>         TEST_ASSERT_VAL("#system_tsc_freq > 0", val > 0);
>     else
>         TEST_ASSERT_VAL("#system_tsc_freq == 0", fpclassify(val) == FP_ZERO);
> +#endif
> 
>     /*
>      * Source count returns the number of events aggregating in a leader

I confirmed the change above fixes the failure on Arm64.

Tested-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>