From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B5A4D70E09 for ; Fri, 29 Nov 2024 02:47:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4XzyJK5cJ1z2yN8; Fri, 29 Nov 2024 13:47:13 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=198.175.65.17 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1732848433; cv=none; b=jI/UqKz6JAoGm9u4kuuLIQmwgEE2sZW5BqaA9WO8ZCR3gACMCbdZ43iYUuCGA0Xf01N7dq3SF9BofAQsPZAd4WFdEh/MHbQMFWu2sbjigp/TcRXb4sP59xHuCt2wUM8qqqY1hz5zlGozO8TRIltdK02oOhzvMGuLtdE/vXqfgQKpJd/THxEV/k39zN4IzhViHamkGEX2vOS8d0MYUimPaeGQxYQIvDwotkhSP+E7qh1KSZp6Bjm/s+aqajeH/0H3UQoyr1tXVQG9eZuC1VxVlOXtHXLuKaltCZCsn9Q2ZFX6cEmJwmM4lq0Cw7bkHrA7G04gPcKk76ayXaUWRZJn4w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1732848433; c=relaxed/relaxed; bh=Hk9zMoDcE5wyq5i77c/JybahqCDfXnjy6iN9kcroPaI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=H9hHW81MXP5N+/9oC4gg6Oy8BmB/1uBedT48lm8pYQQvDZcAddWX0vKVZS0WtXyfcYK+g+Xs7HM+Na4nEn7gml0kjOWd2P1E8z+lAS3z9UymuNaeVO4/OmcYhgywbA6bqx22bPtL49YNQe/3c96BkksNmURtw0aBk2FkNtc2eeN8qW/PNxdXJRNL14XX/+gTWohYap18kcagrzSLu1O3fhMkrqa6tH6u/sopxgvp7yQ/AXJe2E0vYgXDM6FFF7v7CkFxrvrjnjT1AXJ1DCdxPVdrqFI7tgCJ8YYdjroEYsAZiEfQknCq/3j6iY0E0xQFkbSgE8UKl9e8bNwQWRijQQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=Intel header.b=OQ1aUYWj; dkim-atps=neutral; spf=pass (client-ip=198.175.65.17; helo=mgamail.intel.com; envelope-from=lkp@intel.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=Intel header.b=OQ1aUYWj; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=intel.com (client-ip=198.175.65.17; helo=mgamail.intel.com; envelope-from=lkp@intel.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XzyJH03x5z2yLT for ; Fri, 29 Nov 2024 13:47:07 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1732848431; x=1764384431; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=Iyi+W+JKz0EAQaKtqkrUOsmAFLfBMZSMkSfcKblxaS8=; b=OQ1aUYWj+472fL6NueLYTi29J9vxHh3whTCrFDOgtBPJRFuxtBz2aLw8 kv2eF5VFqXjTlrG6KPtv2G+fHxwQ/VUwplQmxobMMP4ghPlO6mth2hq2B RZp0vsQc2cS5wvtnB/rA1Gz6G3+XCbZtFOH7LHcjG5oBRD34YSRPRrFS5 O/Z4w6fWTZjtmBU8WXv7kqoYfNM+ZNZICtH15714RKJSDDZuPG5VY0ArV j2MIV4kUKM4nsfVsTnfevFHba9wZjOjYjYmrr5AYqKHGEmwiAs65aw78B qoGW1fUbWLnW2XPV8lkuODLLDHXotLTg7PaO/2DsnREZ3E0ER1b/szgJC g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 4U3n9P2yTKuuY9ry/znN+w== X-CSE-MsgGUID: fdgbtK7qTMiSfdR8EzcaaA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11270"; a="33137824" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,194,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="33137824" Received: from fmviesa008.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.148]) by orvoesa109.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Nov 2024 18:47:04 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: OcwmjXnURpODgunOkehPOg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: eL24zCVPSSGLJuhXw/TONg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,194,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="92554387" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 8122d2fc1967) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa008.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 28 Nov 2024 18:46:57 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 8122d2fc1967 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1tGr1y-000AGR-2s; Fri, 29 Nov 2024 02:46:54 +0000 Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 10:46:18 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Eliav Farber , linux@armlinux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, npiggin@gmail.com, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, naveen@kernel.org, maddy@linux.ibm.com, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, tglx@linutronix.de, ebiederm@xmission.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, bhe@redhat.com, hbathini@linux.ibm.com, sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com, adityag@linux.ibm.com, songshuaishuai@tinylab.org, takakura@valinux.co.jp, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, jonnyc@amazon.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] kexec: Consolidate machine_kexec_mask_interrupts() implementation Message-ID: <202411291047.R9P698b2-lkp@intel.com> References: <20241128201027.10396-2-farbere@amazon.com> X-Mailing-List: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Archive: , List-Subscribe: , , List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241128201027.10396-2-farbere@amazon.com> Hi Eliav, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on powerpc/next] [also build test ERROR on powerpc/fixes tip/irq/core arm64/for-next/core linus/master v6.12 next-20241128] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Eliav-Farber/kexec-Consolidate-machine_kexec_mask_interrupts-implementation/20241129-041259 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241128201027.10396-2-farbere%40amazon.com patch subject: [PATCH v3 1/2] kexec: Consolidate machine_kexec_mask_interrupts() implementation config: x86_64-rhel-9.4 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241129/202411291047.R9P698b2-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241129/202411291047.R9P698b2-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202411291047.R9P698b2-lkp@intel.com/ All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): kernel/kexec_core.c: In function 'machine_kexec_mask_interrupts': >> kernel/kexec_core.c:1085:24: error: implicit declaration of function 'irq_desc_get_chip' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 1085 | chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> kernel/kexec_core.c:1085:22: warning: assignment to 'struct irq_chip *' from 'int' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion] 1085 | chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc); | ^ >> kernel/kexec_core.c:1097:38: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct irq_chip' 1097 | if (check_eoi && chip->irq_eoi && irqd_irq_inprogress(&desc->irq_data)) | ^~ >> kernel/kexec_core.c:1097:51: error: implicit declaration of function 'irqd_irq_inprogress' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 1097 | if (check_eoi && chip->irq_eoi && irqd_irq_inprogress(&desc->irq_data)) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> kernel/kexec_core.c:1097:76: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct irq_desc' 1097 | if (check_eoi && chip->irq_eoi && irqd_irq_inprogress(&desc->irq_data)) | ^~ kernel/kexec_core.c:1098:29: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct irq_chip' 1098 | chip->irq_eoi(&desc->irq_data); | ^~ kernel/kexec_core.c:1098:44: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct irq_desc' 1098 | chip->irq_eoi(&desc->irq_data); | ^~ kernel/kexec_core.c:1100:25: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct irq_chip' 1100 | if (chip->irq_mask) | ^~ kernel/kexec_core.c:1101:29: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct irq_chip' 1101 | chip->irq_mask(&desc->irq_data); | ^~ kernel/kexec_core.c:1101:45: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct irq_desc' 1101 | chip->irq_mask(&desc->irq_data); | ^~ kernel/kexec_core.c:1103:25: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct irq_chip' 1103 | if (chip->irq_disable && !irqd_irq_disabled(&desc->irq_data)) | ^~ kernel/kexec_core.c:1103:43: error: implicit declaration of function 'irqd_irq_disabled'; did you mean 'arch_irqs_disabled'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 1103 | if (chip->irq_disable && !irqd_irq_disabled(&desc->irq_data)) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | arch_irqs_disabled kernel/kexec_core.c:1103:66: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct irq_desc' 1103 | if (chip->irq_disable && !irqd_irq_disabled(&desc->irq_data)) | ^~ kernel/kexec_core.c:1104:29: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct irq_chip' 1104 | chip->irq_disable(&desc->irq_data); | ^~ kernel/kexec_core.c:1104:48: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct irq_desc' 1104 | chip->irq_disable(&desc->irq_data); | ^~ cc1: some warnings being treated as errors vim +/irq_desc_get_chip +1085 kernel/kexec_core.c 1075 1076 void machine_kexec_mask_interrupts(void) 1077 { 1078 unsigned int i; 1079 struct irq_desc *desc; 1080 1081 for_each_irq_desc(i, desc) { 1082 struct irq_chip *chip; 1083 int check_eoi = 1; 1084 > 1085 chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc); 1086 if (!chip) 1087 continue; 1088 1089 if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64)) { 1090 /* 1091 * First try to remove the active state. If this fails, try to EOI the 1092 * interrupt. 1093 */ 1094 check_eoi = irq_set_irqchip_state(i, IRQCHIP_STATE_ACTIVE, false); 1095 } 1096 > 1097 if (check_eoi && chip->irq_eoi && irqd_irq_inprogress(&desc->irq_data)) -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki