From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C828CE7719A for ; Sat, 11 Jan 2025 13:08:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4YVf371ZmRz3c8Q; Sun, 12 Jan 2025 00:08:19 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=198.175.65.9 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1736600899; cv=none; b=ahnoRgFs1/jCCIgZ8kONivHJRmRffTP11Y44aFXhK/L+jzHEfzpINPC4RvgnY1X2Uyx/ZLrScCmTPt5ZRknUUulghPezjpWtWliYf3yUtsuvVcm9ErXWghyObPpOc2eZ1LiWKmNPookTXy9Z8MAwS4LayTpQ5WV+b8Q1PKTbDLoiThuCacoiWbcbf1SAFgcCU2limZWKUxkxnvHuuXg/TaHCq3IAnKpAv1Ogs1MOf9LQkfarUQ9mxIAs8bNnL3wQuNvmuR2PXkrqOqCPHMjap6RdLMr+xQhJXMRtxX6S5sNyOTqqRX7AycQ7Z351i+85IAhauQdW61laTHZWCLHO+Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1736600899; c=relaxed/relaxed; bh=vhV53Az3xWQYguj1iDxFerMwVQLBwWduSnCH/IURp80=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=lCpH9XuxdQT9bbAVZopYQ4ITpRQ/hN9Fb4UR87+RUxymF7Z+249NZqeqhFNkDLdNVSUh3z6qC/jjLaTj4inps3Uq4hJHOx2I78oA+L0SLyBuTGNpdqu6UtpdIFF7okrAtcMU5kPDi5jXJoBRoBYKYcBl/GvE+E57Y3lV027iE8UyVYOxEAtrFMu/iiPdcN6Pl3ipcV4L5jPHDMnfeCC9c1mIgsFVKTNcczznLPkxwS+n4Ug5FFCeg2+DImC9zL1RQ4mgkOhfa2Zukxd0V5BQd7zioylWRshLWj3xd8gXeJIb7SCnjs3wskC5vtZgpIdXPZsp8gWlggJi5h6XhgEyIw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=Intel header.b=W9vkh8pJ; dkim-atps=neutral; spf=pass (client-ip=198.175.65.9; helo=mgamail.intel.com; envelope-from=lkp@intel.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=Intel header.b=W9vkh8pJ; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=intel.com (client-ip=198.175.65.9; helo=mgamail.intel.com; envelope-from=lkp@intel.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4YVf331Nswz30NY for ; Sun, 12 Jan 2025 00:08:12 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1736600896; x=1768136896; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=wdSwZqiGhYyZAx+e2IQorQXp43S0F5s8LS6LS3NEPn0=; b=W9vkh8pJJydPU7uG5Sw09LWF1pCktO5PjNUvArHQKRDUfj1ziYQYVRZ1 Zc1xN/HSQ4IPUsjjOR2Vj/3Am8t5agKr3zvMVRssZm0JFMIV4XbuhAP/R lZYlP767v8y/4CWa+g0buq/zaew5611Dnk1ZdHSWaUBkwLIxz8GPjyd0q id4/nlyKB3mjfkjjrl/qS/L+cRmTSqPJ3eCuMMot9ivyNRXqebitKm5ds iQjpZwcX2FqdK+yQxUoDpVi2QDluCKXh8B7B3ZsPkEbCUf1ziiEGpTwyN Y5i2PG0coIAKCjmnJCRbhICWjNsLs48idJzmXZ5wd9wxhlf8RRwt492EL Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: +Ya107KQQgydWh+5rq5pNw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: uFHpSXL4Tgy/HW8R3SxIRQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11312"; a="59370305" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,307,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="59370305" Received: from orviesa006.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.146]) by orvoesa101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Jan 2025 05:08:09 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 3/wqF2ZURhC4WRstUhiavQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 6Lir+QKzQ4WRshUr7vMXAQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,307,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="104040539" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO d63d4d77d921) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa006.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Jan 2025 05:08:01 -0800 Received: from kbuild by d63d4d77d921 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1tWbDa-000KfP-2E; Sat, 11 Jan 2025 13:07:58 +0000 Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2025 21:07:51 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Andrey Albershteyn , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Andrey Albershteyn , linux-api@vger.kernel.org, monstr@monstr.eu, mpe@ellerman.id.au, npiggin@gmail.com, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, naveen@kernel.org, maddy@linux.ibm.com, luto@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, chris@zankel.net, jcmvbkbc@gmail.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, brauner@kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, arnd@arndb.de, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: introduce getfsxattrat and setfsxattrat syscalls Message-ID: <202501112052.ZJEvfjhd-lkp@intel.com> References: <20250109174540.893098-1-aalbersh@kernel.org> X-Mailing-List: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Archive: , List-Subscribe: , , List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250109174540.893098-1-aalbersh@kernel.org> Hi Andrey, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on brauner-vfs/vfs.all] [also build test WARNING on geert-m68k/for-next powerpc/next powerpc/fixes s390/features linus/master v6.13-rc6 next-20250110] [cannot apply to geert-m68k/for-linus deller-parisc/for-next jcmvbkbc-xtensa/xtensa-for-next arnd-asm-generic/master tip/x86/asm] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Andrey-Albershteyn/fs-introduce-getfsxattrat-and-setfsxattrat-syscalls/20250110-014739 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/vfs.git vfs.all patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250109174540.893098-1-aalbersh%40kernel.org patch subject: [PATCH] fs: introduce getfsxattrat and setfsxattrat syscalls config: arm-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250111/202501112052.ZJEvfjhd-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 17.0.6 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 6009708b4367171ccdbf4b5905cb6a803753fe18) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250111/202501112052.ZJEvfjhd-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202501112052.ZJEvfjhd-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> :1615:2: warning: syscall getfsxattrat not implemented [-W#warnings] 1615 | #warning syscall getfsxattrat not implemented | ^ >> :1618:2: warning: syscall setfsxattrat not implemented [-W#warnings] 1618 | #warning syscall setfsxattrat not implemented | ^ 2 warnings generated. -- >> :1615:2: warning: syscall getfsxattrat not implemented [-W#warnings] 1615 | #warning syscall getfsxattrat not implemented | ^ >> :1618:2: warning: syscall setfsxattrat not implemented [-W#warnings] 1618 | #warning syscall setfsxattrat not implemented | ^ 2 warnings generated. -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki