From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4787E7719A for ; Sat, 11 Jan 2025 21:06:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4YVrff15Hgz2yQL; Sun, 12 Jan 2025 08:06:18 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=198.175.65.11 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1736629578; cv=none; b=IiSbiND/28DiQKQqIjr94uotaN3otg3YuhKhfzJJHmVCgOg3VbyChUGO2v1rLv8B2+zYQzgVtM2FU3XolWpmEP6rUzln5S2bIsnItsuDrEM7mUPgT2xYDfV/rsnuR+cTijYzJlZxsVCsJIuITzH0OHwA08Dy5txP10aqZJezsdhGCbcyj68YAorbbgyRrBsw09z5s6GU6EQ7+RaQhmpmWm/AlK2j6e9bA0s/nhQCsSaawV0eQQDlmBBRrU7n0hVwL/iYQG3ThM3dSp/GYahK21FOO23D6KdmEWxxQYiJrt7vhV/27LRmuGcBWDefURRQL0E+cU1SJszAuxCiAL8RqQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1736629578; c=relaxed/relaxed; bh=mvkdXy9lLysaT8QhM/d6vPcUTkE3PRgD0ZABECxyWp8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=mScNOoHR/4YxWvB4ZyXW7A4ZDt61joL1sgwopszkmPNVlKYFeo12CxVNz/NjSsGEorghtY0pmYpwBTyz8gU2YissikCa78gMzohaRWOwolWYEReL+YZiafITJdiubCE3Ntt7mlvLzDwjK11gIdGRLR/0K1R2a8nOdY/zqUPzMWycyLy2r1b1OuLM+kTwu7s09UQRn5VS8amYf7Fan6sRnaF3xhnCyTyY223LYgR1WqGnHcoNAUZbXc1iPBwbtcxE7ypzE3zRimGG+6dfjLGeEHC8/iqJRLuJoP0n6yW8vNDxJbT5sFiICYuJUkvQqJY7IeqNYip0O7QfkRbm5ZSAbg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=Intel header.b=CidCj/v3; dkim-atps=neutral; spf=pass (client-ip=198.175.65.11; helo=mgamail.intel.com; envelope-from=lkp@intel.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=Intel header.b=CidCj/v3; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=intel.com (client-ip=198.175.65.11; helo=mgamail.intel.com; envelope-from=lkp@intel.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4YVrfZ3mQZz2yGN for ; Sun, 12 Jan 2025 08:06:11 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1736629575; x=1768165575; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=KIyVo7rhDv5U9a2m9uUPF1sHWPaMkt6MToDHXgzY2SQ=; b=CidCj/v3A14UWX7LylaMzu8BGqo7dSyITbAnYt/y44vM40mym+V1VC7y q9zNPzHgNv/eWPmKwEfm6DptRSFNRVdFgMwCp7m3ojVjq8FmJ41c16bpR PRj5QmxIj+LmvD1JOJP4/Vye33a40cC7Pfgq4JD9DWuxwerZu2wCISs77 rjkTsG94Q72ti0/xcEkvm4Stc8Ei1kUWyoF0UVpHp8xmMW4cJ5xmx3EJB cD00K0EdnaboGte+VM8Eegm7r7Nmxo2hqJutCxveDD+ITzNDvFN7qo2z8 9vcJxbAZthAezANr90zmknIm1I6C0y3rX9jmbVqXXWDQK39o4hYoKZmrC w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: wRJujcj7QveBRcWuPgtDkw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: dF0Deo8JTk6Jjp/9InwEDg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11312"; a="47391052" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,308,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="47391052" Received: from orviesa004.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.144]) by orvoesa103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Jan 2025 13:06:05 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: USUZh5MxQrKqMrvcO7TRsQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: v47+EjcAR0GF9DNRbLx7iw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,308,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="109054185" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO d63d4d77d921) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Jan 2025 13:05:58 -0800 Received: from kbuild by d63d4d77d921 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1tWig7-000LCn-2U; Sat, 11 Jan 2025 21:05:55 +0000 Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 05:05:19 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Andrey Albershteyn , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Andrey Albershteyn , linux-api@vger.kernel.org, monstr@monstr.eu, mpe@ellerman.id.au, npiggin@gmail.com, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, naveen@kernel.org, maddy@linux.ibm.com, luto@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, chris@zankel.net, jcmvbkbc@gmail.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, brauner@kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, arnd@arndb.de, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: introduce getfsxattrat and setfsxattrat syscalls Message-ID: <202501120410.3ZwwYXqY-lkp@intel.com> References: <20250109174540.893098-1-aalbersh@kernel.org> X-Mailing-List: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Archive: , List-Subscribe: , , List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250109174540.893098-1-aalbersh@kernel.org> Hi Andrey, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on brauner-vfs/vfs.all] [also build test WARNING on geert-m68k/for-next powerpc/next powerpc/fixes s390/features linus/master v6.13-rc6 next-20250110] [cannot apply to geert-m68k/for-linus deller-parisc/for-next jcmvbkbc-xtensa/xtensa-for-next tip/x86/asm] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Andrey-Albershteyn/fs-introduce-getfsxattrat-and-setfsxattrat-syscalls/20250110-014739 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/vfs.git vfs.all patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250109174540.893098-1-aalbersh%40kernel.org patch subject: [PATCH] fs: introduce getfsxattrat and setfsxattrat syscalls config: riscv-randconfig-002-20250111 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250112/202501120410.3ZwwYXqY-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: riscv64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250112/202501120410.3ZwwYXqY-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202501120410.3ZwwYXqY-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> :1615:2: warning: #warning syscall getfsxattrat not implemented [-Wcpp] >> :1618:2: warning: #warning syscall setfsxattrat not implemented [-Wcpp] -- >> :1615:2: warning: #warning syscall getfsxattrat not implemented [-Wcpp] >> :1618:2: warning: #warning syscall setfsxattrat not implemented [-Wcpp] -- >> :1615:2: warning: #warning syscall getfsxattrat not implemented [-Wcpp] >> :1618:2: warning: #warning syscall setfsxattrat not implemented [-Wcpp] -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki